Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: mediatek,dpintf: Add DP_INTF binding

[Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>]

Hi Rob,

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 06:44:53PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:46:18 +0200, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> > DP_INTF is a similar functional block to mediatek,dpi but is different
> > in that it serves the DisplayPort controller on mediatek SoCs and uses
> > different clocks. Therefore this patch creates a new binding file for
> > this functional block.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Notes:
> >     Changes v3 -> v4:
> >     - Fixed clock names in the example as the clock patch series is merged into
> >       next now
> >     - Add missing ports decleration to the example
> > 
> >     Changes v1 -> v2:
> >     - Move the devicetree binding from mediatek,dpi into its own binding file.
> > 
> >  .../display/mediatek/mediatek,dpintf.yaml     | 86 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpintf.yaml
> > 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Thanks a lot for reviewing. However I am going to recombine dpintf with
dpi as Chun-Kuang helped me realize that the fdp clock is a parent of
the pixel clock and therefore not a different clock. In the end the
clocks are the same now for both dpi and dpintf, so no need for a
separate document.

Best,
Markus

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel