From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AD7C433F5 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA6CB60F90 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:27:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org DA6CB60F90 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=IjCotbolvofyLPp2v77hVebVChJjEW/A65M3oSIyYUg=; b=3C/culnBmkzeYp 9SdKW1WLRULYXDzK54/mLGpEU2W1ksp1q5r7RgoY5X5bIuOpwNYR4gTv2S33YIHc1r9dtD30X27mn F2q0ip1csQsluW/CEXYVglrSb1vyYydr0vKBo4OLtFpBf68bOMv7lMFjcS3T2K5klkSpgxY5ygYnQ y6bXPXBz8bJOwLq7S4snRpdHlmNuLBcEyYPh+zvGHZ4Icm+O2zLQsbelEKynK64jtGXxFxALyOodS EjUNoaEHX8/mqiu+5V340A6VZK67VDWhF82OfiW/zjES02R87lP7RkHKcCN4MlWBj7UGUs+k8tQiC n7d9qHSPJCXToJH8La2w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mfIiF-001DkB-Rw; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:25:44 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mfIhu-001Deb-TK for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:25:24 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9B01063; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 02:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakrids.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 84FFE3F70D; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 02:25:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Rutland To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, catalin.marinas@arm.com, deanbo422@gmail.com, green.hu@gmail.com, guoren@kernel.org, jonas@southpole.se, kernelfans@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, nickhu@andestech.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, shorne@gmail.com, stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi, tglx@linutronix.de, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, vgupta@kernel.org, vladimir.murzin@arm.com, will@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 02/17] irq: mips: simplify bcm6345_l1_irq_handle() Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:24:49 +0100 Message-Id: <20211026092504.27071-3-mark.rutland@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20211026092504.27071-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> References: <20211026092504.27071-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211026_022523_016128_BD003B7E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.06 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org As bcm6345_l1_irq_handle() only needs to know /whether/ an IRQ was resolved, and doesn't need to know the specific IRQ, it's simpler for it to call generic_handle_domain_irq() directly and check the return code, so let's do that. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer Cc: Thomas Gleixner --- drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c index 1bd0621c4ce2..fd079215c17f 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c @@ -132,16 +132,12 @@ static void bcm6345_l1_irq_handle(struct irq_desc *desc) int base = idx * IRQS_PER_WORD; unsigned long pending; irq_hw_number_t hwirq; - unsigned int irq; pending = __raw_readl(cpu->map_base + reg_status(intc, idx)); pending &= __raw_readl(cpu->map_base + reg_enable(intc, idx)); for_each_set_bit(hwirq, &pending, IRQS_PER_WORD) { - irq = irq_linear_revmap(intc->domain, base + hwirq); - if (irq) - generic_handle_irq(irq); - else + if (generic_handle_domain_irq(intc->domain, base + hwirq)) spurious_interrupt(); } } -- 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel