From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824FEC433EF for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 19:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48E2D603E5 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 19:54:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 48E2D603E5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References: List-Owner; bh=d3giLPmeNrv0uZyCQqUxvbwwgVGVVs3SHq/EnVB8eao=; b=VdvYfTpi8wg1h5 GWNhQGdfHrlZpFrXFjqZTKeGH3YyDpYBC3DjtvPm0fF4iPzNFR9dw6PbxSVV0ahxlIUNtR+UjAZen 5jR5W+RxMXwnIFAsCr+325KD4jQPd1C3OA2x79ltpe/AXhYvH4FKAN0rbX6LK/nIxhy4GZ2XSjbTB wFCTSn18HnzV9V3Dadz3wDCIvaLO4uOWAHIwwwSVJgpntX6ZhV/5a1fn0XaR3WvyRBFCngIdYDFwF r/dUV/gwFJy2iQ/yayKaBR/pbZqUv7FjhDCycuvUwkQfBlwpYckN+WvX5sBdJDaKblgacvSke9Mm3 I7kZbLTZpA/rfWVsldpw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mgXvH-00C5WJ-Ow; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 19:52:21 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mgWws-00BrB2-5J; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 18:49:55 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D962C61040; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 18:49:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1635533393; bh=O8j+eIcFHO42eBXB/HW5ZtEu1Eo+aRSqEdx7g78XWBw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=IK+OcgXFKcn2uI7XrdaaVjnnPWturVsiX3l4ZgeB0t50qfwRv8inFWFDjZc9u4Ifm lm9D+ZfE9k3nVY4hPuEfmURsLyuAVpVR4AIn9KLG7V1FFZ62I9N6urXKwV1VqsAVL8 eo3LtZhrN6G1JEiG4URaJzq8O7bDzLp0nT8jZ3DCCyWRiSAtU82/eupwkHRGorSZWv hJLpsd4pSvJKUF7IjxSoEJ/ftunYfYmXqkRpd8PCMxzaIiwY/7sdfKpAIRKwrjxM8h grLpGCCmIqwOIIviez8rHwX8BeiZJ7JKn0iJ0AVsgCdij3wl8WKPrdhRaVOnOz2rWw eUXkvViMQB7hQ== Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 13:49:51 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Sergio Paracuellos Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer , Yanteng Si , Florian Fainelli , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Yanteng Si , Stephen Rothwell , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Rob Herring , kw@linux.com, Bjorn Helgaas , Matthias Brugger , Philipp Zabel , linux-pci , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , "open list:MIPS" , chenhuacai@kernel.org, sterlingteng@gmail.com, Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] MIPS: cm/cpc: export some missing symbols to be able to use them from driver code Message-ID: <20211029184951.GA329702@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211029_114954_317417_534A9A73 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 46.28 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:28:47AM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:47 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:59:17AM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:34 AM Sergio Paracuellos > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:24 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:11:18AM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 6:05 AM Yanteng Si wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since commit 2bdd5238e756 ("PCI: mt7621: Add MediaTek MT7621 PCIe host controller driver") > > > > > > > the MT7621 PCIe host controller driver is built as a module but modpost complains once these > > > > > > > drivers become modules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ERROR: modpost: "mips_cm_unlock_other" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined! > > > > > > > ERROR: modpost: "mips_cpc_base" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined! > > > > > > > ERROR: modpost: "mips_cm_lock_other" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined! > > > > > > > ERROR: modpost: "mips_cm_is64" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined! > > > > > > > ERROR: modpost: "mips_gcr_base" [drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.ko] undefined! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's just export them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yanteng Si > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > arch/mips/kernel/mips-cm.c | 5 +++++ > > > > > > > arch/mips/kernel/mips-cpc.c | 1 + > > > > > > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Sergio Paracuellos > > > > > > > > > > could we instead make the pcie-mt761 driver non modular ? Exporting > > > > > all MIPS specific stuff for just making an essential driver modular > > > > > doesn't IMHO make much sense. > > > > > > > > The driver is modular because I have been advised other times that new > > > > drivers should be able to be compiled as modules and we should avoid > > > > using 'bool' in Kconfig for new drivers. That's the only reason. I am > > > > also always including as 'y' the driver since for me not having pci in > > > > my boards has no sense... I am ok in changing Kconfig to be 'bool' > > > > instead of 'tristate', but I don't know what should be the correct > > > > thing to do in this case. Thoughts? > > > > > > I guess we also want the driver to at least be compile tested in > > > 'allmodconfig' and other similars...15692a80d949 > > > > Sounds like the systems that actually use this driver require it to be > > built-in, and the only benefit of exporting these symbols is that we > > would get better compile test coverage. > > > > If that's the case, I agree that it's better to just make it > > non-modular. > > I agree and that was my reasoning for sending a patch to also convert > to bool the phy driver that this PCIe controller uses. When the pull > request was sent from Vinod to Greg, Greg refused to take it because > of that commit and the commit was reverted and a new pull request was > sent including this revert. This is commit 15692a80d949 ("phy: Revert > "phy: ralink: Kconfig: convert mt7621-pci-phy into 'bool'""). Because > of this I also changed the PCIe controller Kconfig from bool to > tristate when I sent v3 of the series which at the end were the ones > that was finally taken. There are also other ralink related symbols > that have been exported to allow to compile other drivers as a > modules, like the watchdog. See the commit fef532ea0cd8 ("MIPS: > ralink: export rt_sysc_membase for rt2880_wdt.c"). So, as I said, I > agree and I am using the driver as if it were a bool and also ralink > systems normally require all drivers built-in, but I think we have to > take into account also the "historical facts" here. In any case, > Bjorn, let me know if you want me to send whatever patch might be > needed. I didn't see the conversation with Greg, so I don't know the whole story. For pcie-mt7621.c, it looks like the only problem is setup_cm_memory_region(), which does a little coherency-related stuff. If we could move that to arch/mips, we could still make this tristate. One way might be to implement a pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() for mips and put the setup_cm_memory_region() stuff in there. It's not *ideal* because that's a strong/weak function arrangement that doesn't allow for multiple host bridges, but that's probably not an issue here. If we can't do that, I think making it bool is probably the right answer, but it would be worth a brief comment in the commit log to explain the issue. Bjorn _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel