From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin98@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Cc: nsaenz@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
dan.carpenter@oracle.com, phil@raspberrypi.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: vchiq: Replace global state with per device state
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 23:01:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211101172843.GA17771@ojas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84300618-98c8-0f44-e5a5-8d7fd6c853b0@i2se.com>
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 01:19:17PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Ojaswin,
>
> Am 01.11.21 um 12:09 schrieb Ojaswin Mujoo:
> > Currently, the driver has a global g_state variable which is initialised
> > during probe and directly used all over the driver code. However, this
> > prevents the driver to support multiple VideoCore VPUs at the same time.
> >
> > Replace this global state with a per device state which is initialised
> > and allocated during probing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin98@gmail.com>
> ...
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -1763,6 +1795,7 @@ static int vchiq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > struct device_node *fw_node;
> > const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> > struct vchiq_drvdata *drvdata;
> > + struct vchiq_device *vchiq_dev;
> > int err;
> >
> > of_id = of_match_node(vchiq_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
> > @@ -1784,7 +1817,18 @@ static int vchiq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, drvdata);
> >
> > - err = vchiq_platform_init(pdev, &g_state);
> > + vchiq_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vchiq_device), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + vchiq_dev->state = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vchiq_state), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + vchiq_dev->vchiq_pdev = *pdev;
> > +
> > + g_state = vchiq_dev->state;
> > +
>
> just a quick idea: how about storing the global state within vchiq_drvdata?
>
> So there is no need to reinvent somekind of vchiq device which is the
> "same" as the platform device. After that you are able to access the
> private driver data via platform_get_drvdata().
Hi Stefan,
Thank for looking into this. I agree that the vchiq_device is just a
sorta extension of the pdev. However, regarding using the drvdata, I had
some questions.
So I understand the purpose of this patch is to make sure our driver is
able to support multiple devices, that is it can work with say, an SoC
with 2 VideoCore VPUs. In this case, we would need to maintain 2 states
for each VPU instead of a global state, however if we use something like
the following:
drvdata = (struct vchiq_drvdata *)of_id->data;
drvdata->state = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vchiq_state), GFP_KERNEL);
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, drvdata);
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think the assignment to drvdata in line 1
above will return a pointer to the same structure. In which case, the
line 2 will always overwrite the older state that is present.
That's why I was initialising a separate object (vchiq_device) everytime
the probe was called so that each device can have their own device
specific structs.
Please let me know if my understanding of drvdata is wrong here.
>
> Best regards
>
Thank you!
Ojaswin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-01 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-01 11:09 [PATCH 0/1] vchiq: Replacing global structs with per device Ojaswin Mujoo
2021-11-01 11:09 ` [PATCH 1/1] staging: vchiq: Replace global state with per device state Ojaswin Mujoo
2021-11-01 12:19 ` Stefan Wahren
2021-11-01 17:31 ` Ojaswin Mujoo [this message]
2021-11-01 18:58 ` Stefan Wahren
2021-11-01 16:07 ` kernel test robot
2021-11-01 16:45 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211101172843.GA17771@ojas \
--to=ojaswin98@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
--cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).