From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA2FEC433F5 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 23:22:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=a5R7rjCwQUsHppOdOqHc/aD7eHGSIucsSB2xtGldnLQ=; b=02Euxbbldcp1p7 5xc8HYtptb6XHqwUk4OxdVFDfO0I2WKFrvTFwRYCfHczEJhbIaAdPFkiRT/I+7mbi7v+/C4a2qkXD bcgDGlEbRG71169odQ1xUasOb8HGIkk3DqadUzpYVDLw1JbZNR6cjDuf3K9I/8kz/veCEbkcSBCy4 Jjz+oKFGo2gp1FQZe2bfyuwatajByBntBMghkrS2mUguqMv5SvBdzA3Bc41k2krN8KL3C91fFCRLU HmjBthbRs5sZOUb/w8gn31n5ifdePzFBcz/NyFpxN5T8nDU4dgN05LcyenO6IHhxnu2GVzUBx5bOc tmYcZwULYuKwBZ2I/t9g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mpIc7-000Nrq-3u; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 23:20:43 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mpIP6-000Ja8-UN for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 23:07:18 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B3B13A1; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:07:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from e120937-lin.home (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B41CB3F5A1; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 15:07:14 -0800 (PST) From: Cristian Marussi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v6 07/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Make smc transport use common completions Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 23:06:31 +0000 Message-Id: <20211122230640.1345-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20211122230640.1345-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> References: <20211122230640.1345-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211122_150717_166742_2713ED67 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.29 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org When a completion irq is available use it and delegate command completion handling to the core SCMI completion mechanism. If no completion irq is available revert to polling, using the core common polling machinery. Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi --- v4 --> v5 - removed RFC tag v3 --> v4 - renamed usage of .needs_polling to .no_completion_irq --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c index 4effecc3bb46..adaa40df3855 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c @@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ * @shmem: Transmit/Receive shared memory area * @shmem_lock: Lock to protect access to Tx/Rx shared memory area * @func_id: smc/hvc call function id - * @irq: Optional; employed when platforms indicates msg completion by intr. - * @tx_complete: Optional, employed only when irq is valid. */ struct scmi_smc { @@ -34,15 +32,14 @@ struct scmi_smc { struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem; struct mutex shmem_lock; u32 func_id; - int irq; - struct completion tx_complete; }; static irqreturn_t smc_msg_done_isr(int irq, void *data) { struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = data; - complete(&scmi_info->tx_complete); + scmi_rx_callback(scmi_info->cinfo, + shmem_read_header(scmi_info->shmem), NULL); return IRQ_HANDLED; } @@ -111,8 +108,8 @@ static int smc_chan_setup(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct device *dev, dev_err(dev, "failed to setup SCMI smc irq\n"); return ret; } - init_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete); - scmi_info->irq = irq; + } else { + cinfo->no_completion_irq = true; } scmi_info->func_id = func_id; @@ -142,26 +139,21 @@ static int smc_send_message(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = cinfo->transport_info; struct arm_smccc_res res; + /* + * Channel lock will be released only once response has been + * surely fully retrieved, so after .mark_txdone() + */ mutex_lock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock); - shmem_tx_prepare(scmi_info->shmem, xfer); - if (scmi_info->irq) - reinit_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete); - arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(scmi_info->func_id, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res); - if (scmi_info->irq) - wait_for_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete); - - scmi_rx_callback(scmi_info->cinfo, - shmem_read_header(scmi_info->shmem), NULL); - - mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock); - /* Only SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is valid error code */ - if (res.a0) + if (res.a0) { + mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock); return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + return 0; } @@ -173,6 +165,13 @@ static void smc_fetch_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, shmem_fetch_response(scmi_info->shmem, xfer); } +static void smc_mark_txdone(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, int ret) +{ + struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = cinfo->transport_info; + + mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock); +} + static bool smc_poll_done(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) { @@ -186,6 +185,7 @@ static const struct scmi_transport_ops scmi_smc_ops = { .chan_setup = smc_chan_setup, .chan_free = smc_chan_free, .send_message = smc_send_message, + .mark_txdone = smc_mark_txdone, .fetch_response = smc_fetch_response, .poll_done = smc_poll_done, }; -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel