From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add optee transport
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:55:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211125125521.duwjqkkdcbvrc2ct@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211028140009.23331-2-etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 04:00:09PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> Add a new transport channel to the SCMI firmware interface driver for
> SCMI message exchange based on optee transport channel. The optee
> transport is realized by connecting and invoking OP-TEE SCMI service
> interface PTA.
>
> Optee transport support (CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_TRANSPORT_OPTEE) is default
> enabled when optee driver (CONFIG_OPTEE) is enabled. Effective optee
> transport is setup upon OP-TEE SCMI service discovery at optee
> device initialization. For this SCMI UUID is registered to the optee
> bus for probing. This is done from the link_supplier operator of the
> SCMI optee transport.
>
> The optee transport can use a statically defined shared memory in
> which case SCMI device tree node defines it using an "arm,scmi-shmem"
> compatible phandle through property shmem. Alternatively, optee transport
> allocates the shared memory buffer from the optee driver when no shmem
> property is defined.
>
> The protocol used to exchange SCMI message over that shared memory is
> negotiated between optee transport driver and the OP-TEE service through
> capabilities exchange.
>
> OP-TEE SCMI service is integrated in OP-TEE since its release tag 3.13.0.
> The service interface is published in [1].
>
> Link: [1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/blob/3.13.0/lib/libutee/include/pta_scmi_client.h
> Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
> ---
> Changes since v7:
> - Fix transport exit to not unregister scmi optee driver from tee bus
> if the transport was not initialized (hence registered to tee bus).
>
> Changes since v6:
> - Fixed at last s/CFG_OPTEE/CONFIG_OPTEE/ in commit log.
>
> Changes since v5:
> - scmi_optee_link_supplier() doesn't test scmi_optee_private->tee_ctx.
> - Free allocated shared memory when scmi_optee_chan_setup() fails.
> - Close session to TEE SCMI service when SCMI channel is freed.
> - Use SCMI_OPTEE_MAX_MSG_SIZE in SCMI transport descriptor.
>
> Changes since v4:
> - Fix commit log that was not updated to v4 changes.
> - Operator scmi_optee_chan_setup() don't need the defer probe
> operation, it's already done from scmi_optee_link_supplier().
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Fix use of configuration switches when CONFIG_OPTEE and
> CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL are enabled/modules/disabled.
> Mimics scmi virtio integration.
> - Implement link_supplier operator for the scmi_optee transport
> to possibly defer probing when optee bus has not yet enumerated
> the SCMI OP-TEE service. The function ensures scmi_optee registers
> to optee bus enumeration when probe is deferred.
> - Add memory barriers to protect global optee service reference
> when it's updated at transport initialization and removal.
> - Replace enum pta_scmi_caps with macro definitions as enumerated
> types do not really match bit flags definitions. The capabilities
> data is now of type u32.
> - Use scmi_optee_ prefix for scmi transport operator handles
> and few other resources.
> - Fix typo: s/optee_smci_pta_cmd/optee_scmi_pta_cmd/
> - Remove useless DRIVER_NAME.
> - Minor reordering in struct optee_channel.
> - Removed some useless empty lines.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Rebase on for-next/scmi, based on Linux v5.15-rc1.
> - Implement support for dynamic and static shared memory.
> - Factorize some functions and simplify transport exit sequence.
> - Rename driver source file from optee_service.c to optee.c.
>
> No change since v1
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 3 +
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 3 +
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c | 581 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 600 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/optee.c
>
[...]
> +static int setup_dynamic_shmem(struct device *dev, struct scmi_optee_channel *channel)
> +{
> + const size_t msg_size = SCMI_OPTEE_MAX_MSG_SIZE;
> +
> + channel->tee_shm = tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf(scmi_optee_private->tee_ctx, msg_size);
> + if (IS_ERR(channel->tee_shm)) {
> + dev_err(channel->cinfo->dev, "shmem allocation failed\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + channel->shmem = (void *)tee_shm_get_va(channel->tee_shm, 0);
> + memset(channel->shmem, 0, msg_size);
> + shmem_clear_channel(channel->shmem);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
I was holding on applying this patch as I reviewed this partially when I was
on vacation and couldn't remember the comment I had until I just replied now
with applied message 😄.
Anyways, is this dynamic_shmem tested on a hardware ?
shmem_* apis are based on __iomem and IIUC tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf returns
normal memory, so you can't use those shmem_* apis as is. Please drop the
whole dynamic_shmem and send me a patch for v5.17 as we may need more changes
to support that.
I remember Broadcom or someone else wanted this with normal memory, we can
add that support correctly at once involving them too. For now, please drop
that or I can post a patch to do that if you agree with my arguments.
Sorry for completely forgetting about this.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-25 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-28 14:00 [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: Add OP-TEE transport for SCMI Etienne Carriere
2021-10-28 14:00 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add optee transport Etienne Carriere
2021-10-29 10:17 ` Cristian Marussi
2021-11-25 12:55 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2021-10-29 10:21 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: Add OP-TEE transport for SCMI Cristian Marussi
2021-11-02 13:21 ` Rob Herring
2021-11-25 12:25 ` Sudeep Holla
2021-11-25 12:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-02-28 16:01 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-03-01 14:05 ` Etienne Carriere
2022-03-01 14:11 ` Etienne Carriere
2022-03-08 9:53 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-03-01 15:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-03-08 9:51 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2022-03-08 10:18 ` Etienne Carriere
2022-03-16 11:18 ` Ahmad Fatoum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211125125521.duwjqkkdcbvrc2ct@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox