* [PATCH] arm64: fdt: fix membock add/cap ordering
@ 2021-12-13 13:47 Pingfan Liu
2021-12-13 15:31 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pingfan Liu @ 2021-12-13 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree
Cc: Pingfan Liu, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Andrew Morton,
Mike Rapoport, Geert Uytterhoeven, Rob Herring, Frank Rowand,
Nick Terrell
During kdump kernel saves vmcore, it runs into the following bug:
...
[ 15.148919] usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'kmem_cache_node' (offset 0, size 4096)!
[ 15.159707] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 15.164311] kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:99!
[ 15.168482] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
[ 15.173261] Modules linked in: xfs libcrc32c crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce sbsa_gwdt ast i2c_algo_bit drm_vram_helper drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm_ttm_helper ttm drm nvme nvme_core xgene_hwmon i2c_designware_platform i2c_designware_core dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod overlay squashfs zstd_decompress loop
[ 15.206186] CPU: 0 PID: 542 Comm: cp Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4 #1
[ 15.212006] Hardware name: GIGABYTE R272-P30-JG/MP32-AR0-JG, BIOS F12 (SCP: 1.5.20210426) 05/13/2021
[ 15.221125] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 15.228073] pc : usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xa0
[ 15.232074] lr : usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xa0
[ 15.236070] sp : ffff8000121abba0
[ 15.239371] x29: ffff8000121abbb0 x28: 0000000000003000 x27: 0000000000000000
[ 15.246494] x26: 0000000080000400 x25: 0000ffff885c7000 x24: 0000000000000000
[ 15.253617] x23: 000007ff80400000 x22: ffff07ff80401000 x21: 0000000000000001
[ 15.260739] x20: 0000000000001000 x19: ffff07ff80400000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
[ 15.267861] x17: 656a626f2042554c x16: 53206d6f72662064 x15: 6574636574656420
[ 15.274983] x14: 74706d6574746120 x13: 2129363930342065 x12: 7a6973202c302074
[ 15.282105] x11: ffffc8b041d1b148 x10: 00000000ffff8000 x9 : ffffc8b04012812c
[ 15.289228] x8 : 00000000ffff7fff x7 : ffffc8b041d1b148 x6 : 0000000000000000
[ 15.296349] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000007fff x3 : 0000000000000000
[ 15.303471] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff07ff8c064800 x0 : 000000000000006b
[ 15.310593] Call trace:
[ 15.313027] usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xa0
[ 15.316677] __check_heap_object+0xd4/0xf0
[ 15.320762] __check_object_size.part.0+0x160/0x1e0
[ 15.325628] __check_object_size+0x2c/0x40
[ 15.329711] copy_oldmem_page+0x7c/0x140
[ 15.333623] read_from_oldmem.part.0+0xfc/0x1c0
[ 15.338142] __read_vmcore.constprop.0+0x23c/0x350
[ 15.342920] read_vmcore+0x28/0x34
[ 15.346309] proc_reg_read+0xb4/0xf0
[ 15.349871] vfs_read+0xb8/0x1f0
[ 15.353088] ksys_read+0x74/0x100
[ 15.356390] __arm64_sys_read+0x28/0x34
...
This bug introduced by commit b261dba2fdb2 ("arm64: kdump: Remove custom
linux,usable-memory-range handling"), which moves
memblock_cap_memory_range() to fdt, but it breaches the rules that
memblock_cap_memory_range() should come after memblock_add() etc as said
in commit e888fa7bb882 ("memblock: Check memory add/cap ordering").
As a consequence, the virtual address set up by copy_oldmem_page() does
not bail out from the test of virt_addr_valid() in check_heap_object(),
and finally hits the BUG_ON().
Since memblock allocator has no idea about the time point of the full
memblock's population, resolving this issue at arch level code by
calling a new interface early_init_dt_cap_memory_range() exposed by fdt.
Fixes: b261dba2fdb2 ("arm64: kdump: Remove custom linux,usable-memory-range handling")
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 1 +
drivers/of/fdt.c | 5 +++++
include/linux/of_fdt.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
index be5f85b0a24d..353e5171a66c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ void __init __no_sanitize_address setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
xen_early_init();
efi_init();
+ early_init_dt_cap_memory_range();
if (!efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) && ((u64)_text % MIN_KIMG_ALIGN) != 0)
pr_warn(FW_BUG "Kernel image misaligned at boot, please fix your bootloader!");
diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
index bdca35284ceb..bb7e8fc3a334 100644
--- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
+++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
@@ -1278,6 +1278,11 @@ void __init early_init_dt_scan_nodes(void)
memblock_cap_memory_range(cap_mem_addr, cap_mem_size);
}
+void __init early_init_dt_cap_memory_range(void)
+{
+ memblock_cap_memory_range(cap_mem_addr, cap_mem_size);
+}
+
bool __init early_init_dt_scan(void *params)
{
bool status;
diff --git a/include/linux/of_fdt.h b/include/linux/of_fdt.h
index cf48983d3c86..3c8a01627c02 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_fdt.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_fdt.h
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ extern int early_init_dt_scan_root(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
extern bool early_init_dt_scan(void *params);
extern bool early_init_dt_verify(void *params);
extern void early_init_dt_scan_nodes(void);
+extern void early_init_dt_cap_memory_range(void);
extern const char *of_flat_dt_get_machine_name(void);
extern const void *of_flat_dt_match_machine(const void *default_match,
--
2.31.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: fdt: fix membock add/cap ordering
2021-12-13 13:47 [PATCH] arm64: fdt: fix membock add/cap ordering Pingfan Liu
@ 2021-12-13 15:31 ` Rob Herring
2021-12-14 3:06 ` Pingfan Liu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2021-12-13 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pingfan Liu, Zhen Lei
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon,
Andrew Morton, Mike Rapoport, Geert Uytterhoeven, Frank Rowand,
Nick Terrell
+Zhen Lei
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 7:48 AM Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> During kdump kernel saves vmcore, it runs into the following bug:
> ...
> [ 15.148919] usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'kmem_cache_node' (offset 0, size 4096)!
> [ 15.159707] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 15.164311] kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:99!
> [ 15.168482] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
> [ 15.173261] Modules linked in: xfs libcrc32c crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce sbsa_gwdt ast i2c_algo_bit drm_vram_helper drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm_ttm_helper ttm drm nvme nvme_core xgene_hwmon i2c_designware_platform i2c_designware_core dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod overlay squashfs zstd_decompress loop
> [ 15.206186] CPU: 0 PID: 542 Comm: cp Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4 #1
> [ 15.212006] Hardware name: GIGABYTE R272-P30-JG/MP32-AR0-JG, BIOS F12 (SCP: 1.5.20210426) 05/13/2021
> [ 15.221125] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [ 15.228073] pc : usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xa0
> [ 15.232074] lr : usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xa0
> [ 15.236070] sp : ffff8000121abba0
> [ 15.239371] x29: ffff8000121abbb0 x28: 0000000000003000 x27: 0000000000000000
> [ 15.246494] x26: 0000000080000400 x25: 0000ffff885c7000 x24: 0000000000000000
> [ 15.253617] x23: 000007ff80400000 x22: ffff07ff80401000 x21: 0000000000000001
> [ 15.260739] x20: 0000000000001000 x19: ffff07ff80400000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> [ 15.267861] x17: 656a626f2042554c x16: 53206d6f72662064 x15: 6574636574656420
> [ 15.274983] x14: 74706d6574746120 x13: 2129363930342065 x12: 7a6973202c302074
> [ 15.282105] x11: ffffc8b041d1b148 x10: 00000000ffff8000 x9 : ffffc8b04012812c
> [ 15.289228] x8 : 00000000ffff7fff x7 : ffffc8b041d1b148 x6 : 0000000000000000
> [ 15.296349] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000007fff x3 : 0000000000000000
> [ 15.303471] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff07ff8c064800 x0 : 000000000000006b
> [ 15.310593] Call trace:
> [ 15.313027] usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xa0
> [ 15.316677] __check_heap_object+0xd4/0xf0
> [ 15.320762] __check_object_size.part.0+0x160/0x1e0
> [ 15.325628] __check_object_size+0x2c/0x40
> [ 15.329711] copy_oldmem_page+0x7c/0x140
> [ 15.333623] read_from_oldmem.part.0+0xfc/0x1c0
> [ 15.338142] __read_vmcore.constprop.0+0x23c/0x350
> [ 15.342920] read_vmcore+0x28/0x34
> [ 15.346309] proc_reg_read+0xb4/0xf0
> [ 15.349871] vfs_read+0xb8/0x1f0
> [ 15.353088] ksys_read+0x74/0x100
> [ 15.356390] __arm64_sys_read+0x28/0x34
> ...
>
> This bug introduced by commit b261dba2fdb2 ("arm64: kdump: Remove custom
> linux,usable-memory-range handling"), which moves
> memblock_cap_memory_range() to fdt, but it breaches the rules that
> memblock_cap_memory_range() should come after memblock_add() etc as said
> in commit e888fa7bb882 ("memblock: Check memory add/cap ordering").
Presumably only when using EFI boot which throws out any DT memblock setup.
>
> As a consequence, the virtual address set up by copy_oldmem_page() does
> not bail out from the test of virt_addr_valid() in check_heap_object(),
> and finally hits the BUG_ON().
>
> Since memblock allocator has no idea about the time point of the full
> memblock's population, resolving this issue at arch level code by
> calling a new interface early_init_dt_cap_memory_range() exposed by fdt.
>
> Fixes: b261dba2fdb2 ("arm64: kdump: Remove custom linux,usable-memory-range handling")
> Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
> Cc: Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>
> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 1 +
> drivers/of/fdt.c | 5 +++++
> include/linux/of_fdt.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> index be5f85b0a24d..353e5171a66c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ void __init __no_sanitize_address setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>
> xen_early_init();
> efi_init();
> + early_init_dt_cap_memory_range();
As it is efi_init() that does all the memblock setup, I think this
belongs in efi_init() because it would be needed for any arch that
uses EFI for memory setup.
>
> if (!efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) && ((u64)_text % MIN_KIMG_ALIGN) != 0)
> pr_warn(FW_BUG "Kernel image misaligned at boot, please fix your bootloader!");
> diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> index bdca35284ceb..bb7e8fc3a334 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> @@ -1278,6 +1278,11 @@ void __init early_init_dt_scan_nodes(void)
> memblock_cap_memory_range(cap_mem_addr, cap_mem_size);
> }
>
> +void __init early_init_dt_cap_memory_range(void)
> +{
> + memblock_cap_memory_range(cap_mem_addr, cap_mem_size);
This code is changing in [1] which I think should make fixing this
issue easier. I'd suggest making
early_init_dt_check_for_usable_mem_range() non-static and the EFI code
can call it.
I'm also curious how folks testing that series don't hit this issue.
Rob
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211210065533.2023-9-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com/
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: fdt: fix membock add/cap ordering
2021-12-13 15:31 ` Rob Herring
@ 2021-12-14 3:06 ` Pingfan Liu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pingfan Liu @ 2021-12-14 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: Zhen Lei, linux-arm-kernel, devicetree, Catalin Marinas,
Will Deacon, Andrew Morton, Mike Rapoport, Geert Uytterhoeven,
Frank Rowand, Nick Terrell
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:31:41AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> +Zhen Lei
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 7:48 AM Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > During kdump kernel saves vmcore, it runs into the following bug:
> > ...
> > [ 15.148919] usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'kmem_cache_node' (offset 0, size 4096)!
> > [ 15.159707] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 15.164311] kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:99!
> > [ 15.168482] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
> > [ 15.173261] Modules linked in: xfs libcrc32c crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce sbsa_gwdt ast i2c_algo_bit drm_vram_helper drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec drm_ttm_helper ttm drm nvme nvme_core xgene_hwmon i2c_designware_platform i2c_designware_core dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod overlay squashfs zstd_decompress loop
> > [ 15.206186] CPU: 0 PID: 542 Comm: cp Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4 #1
> > [ 15.212006] Hardware name: GIGABYTE R272-P30-JG/MP32-AR0-JG, BIOS F12 (SCP: 1.5.20210426) 05/13/2021
> > [ 15.221125] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> > [ 15.228073] pc : usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xa0
> > [ 15.232074] lr : usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xa0
> > [ 15.236070] sp : ffff8000121abba0
> > [ 15.239371] x29: ffff8000121abbb0 x28: 0000000000003000 x27: 0000000000000000
> > [ 15.246494] x26: 0000000080000400 x25: 0000ffff885c7000 x24: 0000000000000000
> > [ 15.253617] x23: 000007ff80400000 x22: ffff07ff80401000 x21: 0000000000000001
> > [ 15.260739] x20: 0000000000001000 x19: ffff07ff80400000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> > [ 15.267861] x17: 656a626f2042554c x16: 53206d6f72662064 x15: 6574636574656420
> > [ 15.274983] x14: 74706d6574746120 x13: 2129363930342065 x12: 7a6973202c302074
> > [ 15.282105] x11: ffffc8b041d1b148 x10: 00000000ffff8000 x9 : ffffc8b04012812c
> > [ 15.289228] x8 : 00000000ffff7fff x7 : ffffc8b041d1b148 x6 : 0000000000000000
> > [ 15.296349] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000007fff x3 : 0000000000000000
> > [ 15.303471] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff07ff8c064800 x0 : 000000000000006b
> > [ 15.310593] Call trace:
> > [ 15.313027] usercopy_abort+0x9c/0xa0
> > [ 15.316677] __check_heap_object+0xd4/0xf0
> > [ 15.320762] __check_object_size.part.0+0x160/0x1e0
> > [ 15.325628] __check_object_size+0x2c/0x40
> > [ 15.329711] copy_oldmem_page+0x7c/0x140
> > [ 15.333623] read_from_oldmem.part.0+0xfc/0x1c0
> > [ 15.338142] __read_vmcore.constprop.0+0x23c/0x350
> > [ 15.342920] read_vmcore+0x28/0x34
> > [ 15.346309] proc_reg_read+0xb4/0xf0
> > [ 15.349871] vfs_read+0xb8/0x1f0
> > [ 15.353088] ksys_read+0x74/0x100
> > [ 15.356390] __arm64_sys_read+0x28/0x34
> > ...
> >
> > This bug introduced by commit b261dba2fdb2 ("arm64: kdump: Remove custom
> > linux,usable-memory-range handling"), which moves
> > memblock_cap_memory_range() to fdt, but it breaches the rules that
> > memblock_cap_memory_range() should come after memblock_add() etc as said
> > in commit e888fa7bb882 ("memblock: Check memory add/cap ordering").
>
> Presumably only when using EFI boot which throws out any DT memblock setup.
>
Yes, I do think so.
> >
> > As a consequence, the virtual address set up by copy_oldmem_page() does
> > not bail out from the test of virt_addr_valid() in check_heap_object(),
> > and finally hits the BUG_ON().
> >
> > Since memblock allocator has no idea about the time point of the full
> > memblock's population, resolving this issue at arch level code by
> > calling a new interface early_init_dt_cap_memory_range() exposed by fdt.
> >
> > Fixes: b261dba2fdb2 ("arm64: kdump: Remove custom linux,usable-memory-range handling")
> > Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>
> > To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 1 +
> > drivers/of/fdt.c | 5 +++++
> > include/linux/of_fdt.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > index be5f85b0a24d..353e5171a66c 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ void __init __no_sanitize_address setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> >
> > xen_early_init();
> > efi_init();
> > + early_init_dt_cap_memory_range();
>
> As it is efi_init() that does all the memblock setup, I think this
> belongs in efi_init() because it would be needed for any arch that
> uses EFI for memory setup.
>
Reasonable, and efi_init() are shared by arm64 and risc-v now.
> >
> > if (!efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) && ((u64)_text % MIN_KIMG_ALIGN) != 0)
> > pr_warn(FW_BUG "Kernel image misaligned at boot, please fix your bootloader!");
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > index bdca35284ceb..bb7e8fc3a334 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > @@ -1278,6 +1278,11 @@ void __init early_init_dt_scan_nodes(void)
> > memblock_cap_memory_range(cap_mem_addr, cap_mem_size);
> > }
> >
> > +void __init early_init_dt_cap_memory_range(void)
> > +{
> > + memblock_cap_memory_range(cap_mem_addr, cap_mem_size);
>
> This code is changing in [1] which I think should make fixing this
> issue easier. I'd suggest making
> early_init_dt_check_for_usable_mem_range() non-static and the EFI code
> can call it.
>
Thank you for the good advice. I will go in that way.
> I'm also curious how folks testing that series don't hit this issue.
>
Maybe CONFIG_EFI=n.
Thanks,
Pingfan
> Rob
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211210065533.2023-9-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-14 3:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-13 13:47 [PATCH] arm64: fdt: fix membock add/cap ordering Pingfan Liu
2021-12-13 15:31 ` Rob Herring
2021-12-14 3:06 ` Pingfan Liu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).