public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	souvik.chakravarty@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Add configurable polling mode for transports
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 10:49:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211214104949.GE6207@e120937-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213112555.vhjhu3xopesvxmio@bogus>

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:25:55AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:11:46PM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > SCMI communications along TX channels can optionally be provided of a
> > completion interrupt; when such interrupt is not available, command
> > transactions should rely on polling, where the SCMI core takes care to
> > repeatedly evaluate the transport-specific .poll_done() function, if
> > available, to determine if and when a request was fully completed or
> > timed out.
> > 

Hi Sudeep, 

thanks for the review.

> > Such mechanism is already present and working on a single transfer base:
> > SCMI protocols can indeed enable hdr.poll_completion on specific commands
> > ahead of each transfer and cause that transaction to be handled with
> > polling.
> > 
> > Introduce a couple of flags to be able to enforce such polling behaviour
> > globally at will:
> > 
> >  - scmi_desc.force_polling: to statically switch the whole transport to
> >    polling mode.
> > 
> >  - scmi_chan_info.no_completion_irq: to switch a single channel dynamically
> >    to polling mode if, at runtime, is determined that no completion
> >    interrupt was available for such channel.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> > ---
> > v5 --> v6
> > - removed check on replies received by IRQs when xfer was requested
> >   as poll_completion (not all transport can suppress IRQs on an xfer basis)
> > v4 --> v5
> > - make force_polling const
> > - introduce polling_enabled flag to simplify checks on do_xfer
> > v3 --> v4:
> > - renamed .needs_polling flag to .no_completion_irq
> > - refactored error path when polling needed but not supported
> > ---
> >  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 11 +++++++++++
> >  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> > index 6438b5248c24..99b74f4d39b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> > @@ -339,11 +339,19 @@ void scmi_protocol_release(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol_id);
> >   * @dev: Reference to device in the SCMI hierarchy corresponding to this
> >   *	 channel
> >   * @handle: Pointer to SCMI entity handle
> > + * @no_completion_irq: Flag to indicate that this channel has no completion
> > + *		       interrupt mechanism for synchronous commands.
> > + *		       This can be dynamically set by transports at run-time
> > + *		       inside their provided .chan_setup().
> > + * @polling_enabled: Flag used to annotate if polling mode is currently enabled
> > + *		     on this channel.
> >   * @transport_info: Transport layer related information
> >   */
> >  struct scmi_chan_info {
> >  	struct device *dev;
> >  	struct scmi_handle *handle;
> > +	bool no_completion_irq;
> > +	bool polling_enabled;
> 
> Do we really need a separate flag for polling_enabled ?
> no_completion_irq means you need to enable polling and force_polling too.
> Just trying to see if we can get rid of unnecessary flags.
> 

Not really needed indeed, I was just trying to avoid multiple conditions
checks later on the TX path (given no_completion_irq and force_polling
never change after channel setup so I can just note down at setup that
polling is enabled and then just check that later) and improve readability,
but I can just use macros for readability and just ignore the multiple
unneeded checks.

Same holds later on the series for polling_capable flag that I similarly
setup early during probe to avoid unneeded multiple condition checks.

I'll remove both this internal flags and resort to macros, if it's fine
for you.

Thanks,
Cristian

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-14 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-29 19:11 [PATCH v7 00/16] Introduce atomic support for SCMI transports Cristian Marussi
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 01/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Perform earlier cinfo lookup call in do_xfer Cristian Marussi
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 02/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Set polling timeout to max_rx_timeout_ms Cristian Marussi
2021-12-03 20:13   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-13 11:06   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 03/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Refactor message response path Cristian Marussi
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 04/16] include: trace: Add new scmi_xfer_response_wait event Cristian Marussi
2021-12-03 20:16   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 05/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Use new trace event scmi_xfer_response_wait Cristian Marussi
2021-12-03 20:16   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 06/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Add configurable polling mode for transports Cristian Marussi
2021-12-13 11:25   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-12-14 10:49     ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 07/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Make smc transport use common completions Cristian Marussi
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 08/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Add sync_cmds_atomic_replies transport flag Cristian Marussi
2021-12-13 11:54   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-12-14 10:52     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 09/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Make smc support atomic sync commands replies Cristian Marussi
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 10/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Make optee " Cristian Marussi
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 11/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for atomic transports Cristian Marussi
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 12/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Add atomic mode support to smc transport Cristian Marussi
2021-12-13 11:42   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-12-14 10:54     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 13/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Add new parameter to mark_txdone Cristian Marussi
2021-12-03 20:17   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 14/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Add atomic mode support to virtio transport Cristian Marussi
2021-12-10 12:12   ` Peter Hilber
2021-12-20 21:30     ` Cristian Marussi
2022-01-18 14:20       ` Peter Hilber
2021-12-13 11:34   ` Sudeep Holla
2021-12-14 10:56     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 15/16] firmware: arm_scmi: Add atomic support to clock protocol Cristian Marussi
2021-12-03 20:16   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-11-29 19:11 ` [PATCH v7 16/16] clk: scmi: Support atomic clock enable/disable API Cristian Marussi
2021-12-03  2:06   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-12-03 20:17   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-12-10 10:52   ` Vincent Guittot
2021-12-10 13:30     ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-10 14:27       ` Vincent Guittot
2021-12-10 19:36         ` Cristian Marussi
2021-12-13 17:52 ` [PATCH v7 00/16] (subset) Introduce atomic support for SCMI transports Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211214104949.GE6207@e120937-lin \
    --to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
    --cc=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=souvik.chakravarty@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox