From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDC66C433F5 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 10:52:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=rQrcyHvXUymp04zFCjSnFQ/rlB0fgXsNKNQMvelAPUM=; b=n3K4IllOazHotu 5eE7SxZf4EWRQXIZFSXUqnxRdj4wXcXCtG4u2G+krznfZ4cAV5ZM5tEMwe8yUEFQGfBDLJDZ3r+yq gps9MuKg0qMoNf24yyQaDh/jndxsEi0uHZawg3he5ko34JoXBBou+f+93dvhdC1awea2sThj56/wB c6qP+3foIHrMInQO9Z16pVRFHt/dTpNpFVOI9A6KtJiEyT7DsqjxWjLlN2EOuxJUWL6+IzD3Tqff+ mx+aXllgO1vbjb98eXbrPkRwl+Sb6fopzvfTbin8+G+B6ARsh8d0HOlXC/DJ2wj1vz45Evju5hGPl QLv0+YEIRtanFJpfoL9g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n2A2i-000jY0-Gx; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 10:49:20 +0000 Received: from www.linux-watchdog.org ([185.87.125.42]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n2A2e-000jXW-Le for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 10:49:18 +0000 Received: by www.linux-watchdog.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id ACFC4409CD; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 10:21:40 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 www.linux-watchdog.org ACFC4409CD DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-watchdog.org; s=odk20180602; t=1640683300; bh=w8aJnqJpyuqC/xW+n2cbZi4xCrodj+BMPfpwrAepq8g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=E6A+Zft6yL02VjO/ZAA2eLOd46aBp6wp8jxGolGB+5zu6ZcrhRd4Xe3HZrnPvyxSt I5vkXxHxn1NLzFoHWWt3nD8cUl0m2IkjVf2sfRPEJViD6vUYm8MlCPq4MNutT6BroT YZwZlHFqYY3P/37WfLY+MTJSM15Gv8BC9L4ujEFs= Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 10:21:40 +0100 From: Wim Van Sebroeck To: Lee Jones Cc: Guenter Roeck , Florian Fainelli , =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Wim Van Sebroeck , Rob Herring , Justin Chen , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema Message-ID: <20211228092140.GA26632@www.linux-watchdog.org> References: <432664af-5660-aaad-bf75-81e4d61cb078@roeck-us.net> <46a88b40-6d92-727c-7adc-5723921d08e3@gmail.com> <20211206195115.GC3759192@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211228_024917_049663_C0FECCAB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.53 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Lee, > On Tue, 07 Dec 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On 12/7/21 2:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > [ ... ] > > > > It sounded to me like Lee wanted an immutable branch for that > > > > > > Not exactly, I said: > > > > > > "> Suppose we should take patch #2 via [Watchdog] as well. > > > > > > If that happens, I would like a PR to an immutable branch." > > > > > > The alternative is that I take the patch and provide an immutable > > > branch to you, which I am in a position to do. > > > > > > > I understand, only I am not in a position to take it since my tree > > isn't the official watchdog-next tree, and it doesn't show up in -next. > > If Wim takes it into the official watchdog-next tree or not would be > > completely up to him. > > > > I personally don't care if the bindings check is clean in my inofficial > > tree, so maybe this is a non-issue. > > That doesn't help, sadly. > > I think the best course of action is for Wim to let me know when this > patch makes it into his tree. I'll take the MFD one at the same time > and the two shall meet in -next. > > Honestly, this is all such a faff. > > Just to keep a script happy that 3 people care about. It's going in today. Kind regards, Wim. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel