From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: syscfg: Fix memleak on registration failure in cscfg_create_device
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:28:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220120182822.GA1342128@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220120175642.GB1338735@p14s>
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:56:42AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 07:31:00AM +0000, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
> > device_register() calls device_initialize(),
> > according to doc of device_initialize:
> >
> > Use put_device() to give up your reference instead of freeing
> > * @dev directly once you have called this function.
>
> That is _if_ device_initialize() is called manually. In this instance
> @dev is registered with device_register() and unregistered with
> device_unregister(). The latter conforms to the comment you pointed out and
> calls put_device() as expected.
I originally misunderstood the context - you are referring to the failure path in
cscfg_create_device(). You are correct about needing to call put_device() but
your solution will not work when the module is unloaded properly and
device_unregister() is called by way of cscfg_clear_device(). In that case
device_unregister() is already calling put_device().
Here simply calling put_device() instead of cscfg_dev_release() in the error
path should do just fine. That will call cscfg_dev_release() and the memory
allocated for cscfg_mgr will be release.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
> >
> > To prevent potential memleak, use put_device() instead call kfree
> > directly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c
> > index 43054568430f..007fa1c761a7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-syscfg.c
> > @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ struct device *cscfg_device(void)
> > /* Must have a release function or the kernel will complain on module unload */
> > static void cscfg_dev_release(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > - kfree(cscfg_mgr);
> > + put_device(dev);
> > cscfg_mgr = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-20 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-10 7:31 [PATCH] coresight: syscfg: Fix memleak on registration failure in cscfg_create_device Miaoqian Lin
2022-01-20 17:56 ` Mathieu Poirier
2022-01-20 18:28 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2022-01-24 12:41 ` [PATCH v2] " Miaoqian Lin
2022-02-01 17:13 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220120182822.GA1342128@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linmq006@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).