linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: stackprotector: prefer compiler for TLS based per-task protector
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:58:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202201251258.35AAAB07E5@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXFgcoWU2XnL-arTKoA0Sk2AoQVjZ-xVLryGR=fkS89FVA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 07:55:37PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 19:50, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:25:16PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > Currently, we implement the per-task stack protector for ARM using a GCC
> > > plugin, due to lack of native compiler support. However, work is
> > > underway to get this implemented in the compiler, which means we will be
> > > able to deprecate the GCC plugin at some point.
> > >
> > > In the meantime, we will need to support both, where the native compiler
> > > implementation is obviously preferred. So let's wire this up in Kconfig
> > > and the Makefile.
> > >
> > > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > > Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> >
> > I see this patch in the KSPP tree as commit 151bbc8be85e ("ARM:
> > stackprotector: prefer compiler for TLS based per-task protector"),
> > which breaks booting aspeed_g5_defconfig in QEMU with clang-14. It seems
> > like this patch depends on Ard's patch "ARM: decompressor: disable stack
> > protector" [1]; applying that on top of next-20220125 allows me to boot
> > again.
> >
> > This patch is still queued up in Russell's devel-stable branch as
> > commit f05eb1d24eb5 ("ARM: stackprotector: prefer compiler for TLS based
> > per-task protector") so perhaps this patch should be dropped from the
> > KSPP tree? I assume once Ard's recent fixes series [2] is applied to
> > devel-stable, it will be added back to for-next?
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220124174744.1054712-9-ardb@kernel.org/
> > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220125091453.1475246-1-ardb@kernel.org/
> >
> 
> Yeah. better drop it from KSPP.
> 
> The problem is that the compiler version of the per-task
> stackprotector feature does not get disabled when building the
> decompressor, which means it ends up dereferencing bogus TLS register
> values.

Ooh! Whoops, sorry. Dropping.

-- 
Kees Cook

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply	other threads:[~2022-01-25 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-21 14:25 [PATCH] ARM: stackprotector: prefer compiler for TLS based per-task protector Ard Biesheuvel
2021-10-22  6:11 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-22  8:07   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-10-26 17:17 ` Kees Cook
2022-01-25 18:50 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-01-25 18:55   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-01-25 20:58     ` Kees Cook [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202201251258.35AAAB07E5@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).