From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 648E0C433F5 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 18:38:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=9bK7tkicg+yauiOLL8DuNJSpaQSChBZ452xgvS24cWE=; b=vA2s8Xi4Ougq1A 4oHl1SuYEvld5H2qnlgU5DMCXlvAnT3Xroz6je2Zjpbb37CFVanpJgeH05JADVyCDLU9Rf3z8yoN7 TykkeLruOd+Ws6HOUw6vTkHs39NTPmuPKZHSHhGdA3z/hKRMdq5hIMtu15Ko58BQ3ZTjWI9mD9lq5 UhYD76rn+PYnO4tigNFTPSWG4akjt0qMoqKUtWSsvzo07Nb5jwsfXwcyW31fDki9lHn1zArjmFm1/ hqMozboWUd328lojbG/FalZCoGfw1hOuvaZO6H1WocXQHLZsWUdSUNa3DXlZZgOEZ/F2b/IY84ocM tyw3xKyKk0gzSTleTyBg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nEy1a-00DNtE-D1; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:37:06 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nEy0n-00DNWO-GJ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 18:36:20 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id s16so16004425pgs.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 10:36:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=au2QIv+E5efC5CXFBVtN3Dhp88XfEH66mYp3WFA4dy4=; b=OzqPatId9hYU/kdkYqwdo5N/t94vb8Ym5n0MeDAweVjIrNJGKqFDYpfOoGn4KTTXF8 noDYko8zN7lX1ZB7fGgPTZkr0TSwJu/mew/BoFxZBhqE2IbOvlHEtl3wmg1k37OT3Fqj AhAVEXOhTkOr8jQOqokKKuob/1cSiiPXF8Zzc5WMDwW2veUtNn9NSPNhTqmkRlgXjV+w nm1z4SHN8UBQ/Knm+oWMOq6z+3ch9FiDl02rAKZIz3Jp+1VaexPZh7k8uJbeMfGVbA7B 57nJhQELFRgndRbftgkPLN9gCUqzFhUHQmQ4UBNpu7+GNBCVo1vmiPsg8UJGU6RObBVa n0KQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=au2QIv+E5efC5CXFBVtN3Dhp88XfEH66mYp3WFA4dy4=; b=64T6DeNM7O2vlf7FuaEltd8HVr16IHPmXMqgIkW9AsL89GQh+9O2DQHqMi6woIG5qv 5hlVrtk947wE8Qrk+hzfQKDwr3jUP0wHl/zOdv08ahv/5DdpnzjyE16huvPlg3LKd/mm 4qsLLq8upeTRzpasPQqeEKBorqLfxtBYBWtw26nI6whdB+HQHoJQ4tGNTXXyOvx8I3tY evSSYD090MbCN/T+v5QdpDc8y8M8UowNx5uIsCH4NyHunmXShazuxkPmwpxgERhDN8p3 Tz9L8nb7nU94xT1CkuKApAxWIhFkCNRp+8d0etR7LeyOEGyMV2IixRQJV3dffWe8mJJW TSzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531OlTfQwkw06IxVu/WV+LA4Qxlkh88n1U7ER750Pd8HQVPMoTiN hQ2Xrmxpxz5lcFwhO2rZcNRPpw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXfaqwD+jsdqC62UNTBL+nVsylPRncm6pguROBuW/H6mEZXGhxRAt2QA3tJqSx++YfbZqvtg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6885:: with SMTP id d127mr12149556pgc.470.1643740575558; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 10:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from p14s (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k21sm22861321pff.33.2022.02.01.10.36.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Feb 2022 10:36:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 11:36:12 -0700 From: Mathieu Poirier To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] remoteproc: mtk_scp: Use dev_err_probe() where possible Message-ID: <20220201183612.GC2490199@p14s> References: <20220124120915.41292-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> <20220124120915.41292-3-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220124120915.41292-3-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220201_103617_647245_BD5E74B7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.44 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Angelo, On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 01:09:15PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Simplify the probe function, where possible, by using dev_err_probe(). > While at it, as to increase human readability, also remove some > unnecessary forced void pointer casts that were previously used in > error checking. I am in favour of all 3 patches (please add a cover letter next time) but weary about testing - do you have access to a Mediatek platform to try this on or is it purely theoretical? I would definitely feel better to see a "Tested-by" tag by someone out there with access to the HW. Thanks, Mathieu > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno > --- > drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 28 ++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > index e40706b0e015..dcddb33e9997 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c > @@ -757,10 +757,8 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > int ret, i; > > rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &scp_ops, fw_name, sizeof(*scp)); > - if (!rproc) { > - dev_err(dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n"); > - return -ENOMEM; > - } > + if (!rproc) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n"); > > scp = (struct mtk_scp *)rproc->priv; > scp->rproc = rproc; > @@ -770,21 +768,20 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "sram"); > scp->sram_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); > - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->sram_base)) { > - dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n"); > - return PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->sram_base); > - } > + if (IS_ERR(scp->sram_base)) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->sram_base), > + "Failed to parse and map sram memory\n"); > + > scp->sram_size = resource_size(res); > scp->sram_phys = res->start; > > /* l1tcm is an optional memory region */ > res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "l1tcm"); > scp->l1tcm_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); > - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->l1tcm_base)) { > - ret = PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->l1tcm_base); > + if (IS_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(scp->l1tcm_base); > if (ret != -EINVAL) { > - dev_err(dev, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n"); > - return ret; > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to map l1tcm memory\n"); > } > } else { > scp->l1tcm_size = resource_size(res); > @@ -792,10 +789,9 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > scp->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "cfg"); > - if (IS_ERR((__force void *)scp->reg_base)) { > - dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n"); > - return PTR_ERR((__force void *)scp->reg_base); > - } > + if (IS_ERR(scp->reg_base)) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scp->reg_base), > + "Failed to parse and map cfg memory\n"); > > ret = scp->data->scp_clk_get(scp); > if (ret) > -- > 2.33.1 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel