From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03B9AC433FE for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:40:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=OHZbTMYqlA3+Ie5CHnhH/I2QH6KHcXIofKQAiTYF6PA=; b=iXsae3bfwnXtTh RLQ7vaLHxD2/6xEkKUQS0wRBluufsZvVRQdZcrQSEKGfG1D5BmOhxXz5XWnIGiGBha4POUo7PqAMD vib1Qy3kIwVw7YD5ZSZDuXpxCRQUAlXIyR4TkUPYJw86k7HbvuJl0qNWEwUHe7EdGH6rjUvlOsvzc c54Bn/B/5YSAGxOM+x5a+oUzlKZ38mbw805qUkATdJ/tr6bBmRy6+TpnApgLyu4gGphiF1NhC0EEp +SY1QChReLNMpuwEnHHyB80mkpcKl/racPak29+8pDjo/rG+Q5KmYZvnFMGRecXOzGxPV+5p2WJ45 0tFkNn3gWoRPT76y01PQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nK0r9-003h3f-9B; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:39:11 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nK0r6-003h2k-2q for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:39:09 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C46ABB81802; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45011C340EB; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:39:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1644943145; bh=V9kovIYtQQZPjm+yjWJXoF36Q5nY9s/7izEgPXb6ED0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=H20AF5GpAoL0xHR3aw5y9HrMfQPcCLnqPRpm5ZgsnuWQnHD0/e/3t4HykhgISSXdI XBPmf4Kc6YbG2y45fo6XP/43XSOAo2IaNBPCr+PDW3QFrk3UCQGPzKW4r1u8xtm6gm pJmNxc28w0Ulw3yjO0GpfQweuD5Gj/tlk8QGMj0CpMAPB0gbmSds3rdU7M/3Ceh27W qVDXyt7GQPbqpcS09WIiNAtZ3CcfV9jz3WijMroOKdl4Z0HA0j0kqX5o5p7IB03HoY fm/q3Pzzit71kyrQgKTJXnWGQMyFB31qpgDJnJUNSEMYgBKqdxrzLy/bl+zBJt46xx BZwAqoN836hLQ== Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:38:59 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" Cc: Darren Hart , LKML , Linux Arm , Catalin Marinas , Peter Zijlstra , Vincent Guittot , Valentin Schneider , "D . Scott Phillips" , Ilkka Koskinen , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: smp: Skip MC domain for SoCs without shared cache Message-ID: <20220215163858.GA8458@willie-the-truck> References: <8c4a69eca4d0591f30c112df59c5098c24923bd3.1644543449.git.darren@os.amperecomputing.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220215_083908_437880_DCEE008B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 32.76 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 03:20:51AM +0000, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Darren Hart [mailto:darren@os.amperecomputing.com] > > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 2:43 PM > > To: LKML ; Linux Arm > > > > Cc: Catalin Marinas ; Will Deacon ; > > Peter Zijlstra ; Vincent Guittot > > ; Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) > > ; Valentin Schneider > > ; D . Scott Phillips > > ; Ilkka Koskinen > > ; stable@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: [PATCH] arm64: smp: Skip MC domain for SoCs without shared cache > > > > SoCs such as the Ampere Altra define clusters but have no shared > > processor-side cache. As of v5.16 with CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER and > > CONFIG_SCHED_MC, build_sched_domain() will BUG() with: > > > > BUG: arch topology borken > > the CLS domain not a subset of the MC domain > > > > for each CPU (160 times for a 2 socket 80 core Altra system). The MC > > level cpu mask is then extended to that of the CLS child, and is later > > removed entirely as redundant. > > > > This change detects when all cpu_coregroup_mask weights=1 and uses an > > alternative sched_domain_topology equivalent to the default if > > CONFIG_SCHED_MC were disabled. > > > > The final resulting sched domain topology is unchanged with or without > > CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER, and the BUG is avoided: > > > > For CPU0: > > > > With CLS: > > CLS [0-1] > > DIE [0-79] > > NUMA [0-159] > > > > Without CLS: > > DIE [0-79] > > NUMA [0-159] > > > > Cc: Catalin Marinas > > Cc: Will Deacon > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > > Cc: Vincent Guittot > > Cc: Barry Song > > Cc: Valentin Schneider > > Cc: D. Scott Phillips > > Cc: Ilkka Koskinen > > Cc: # 5.16.x > > Signed-off-by: Darren Hart > > Hi Darrent, > What kind of resources are clusters sharing on Ampere Altra? > So on Altra, cpus are not sharing LLC? Each LLC is separate > for each cpu? > > > --- > > arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c > > index 27df5c1e6baa..0a78ac5c8830 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c > > @@ -715,9 +715,22 @@ void __init smp_init_cpus(void) > > } > > } > > > > +static struct sched_domain_topology_level arm64_no_mc_topology[] = { > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT > > + { cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT) }, > > +#endif > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER > > + { cpu_clustergroup_mask, cpu_cluster_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(CLS) }, > > +#endif > > + { cpu_cpu_mask, SD_INIT_NAME(DIE) }, > > + { NULL, }, > > +}; > > + > > void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) > > { > > const struct cpu_operations *ops; > > + bool use_no_mc_topology = true; > > int err; > > unsigned int cpu; > > unsigned int this_cpu; > > @@ -758,6 +771,25 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) > > > > set_cpu_present(cpu, true); > > numa_store_cpu_info(cpu); > > + > > + /* > > + * Only use no_mc topology if all cpu_coregroup_mask weights=1 > > + */ > > + if (cpumask_weight(cpu_coregroup_mask(cpu)) > 1) > > + use_no_mc_topology = false; > > This seems to be wrong? If you have 5 cpus, > Cpu0 has cpu_coregroup_mask(cpu)== 1, cpu1-4 > has cpu_coregroup_mask(cpu)== 4, for cpu0, you still > need to remove MC, but for cpu1-4, you will need > CLS and MC both? What is the *current* behaviour on such a system? Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel