From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD26AC433EF for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:07:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=SRMihU2nf5wWkiDMR3fn9GfcbSEic70/0IfbKcsvFQg=; b=U2ye+KmFvCHJOV gVfCYyMrWxcn6ftGk9nn5bOdM8pyyugwVEeMLSyHBttjyhDI1Jpd9SJSWhXFC1PCVyrVDY0l/JJpt K2pjfDHHu8L2VkSktmNkmiJjyKwGBCwxekmc1AL6VCUrE71gJMfM49RpBVi++MhQR7iIwAMCsIicT VX0Cf/VkbZ6PzOcN6r1c1kr1bVQ08jCUgmGNcSrte6xgMtrM3yttJXvv0OsWFmgZyLwb/5b/vYpa1 GGdigX/HVIFr+oYzkwE1zK9+G56WVswJZ9D/3xjjJP6FgBjZ0teWS9pEsH4douYMuuY+rbodK1qPc pzwpd4WNcc1/Zo1nRtlw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nKNlD-007qk6-Ay; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:06:35 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nKNl8-007qjh-JT for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:06:33 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45A7EB81F91; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9278C004E1; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:06:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1645031188; bh=QZazy3cZ6FBYhiXfAUon+wu9jEu6FQA/xKRmqJoinyM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ogghNWUErZXiynwTWjsZg5Wrn5qHwZHrPJ8uSuZ8TZstwWRhmiJaWAayvns7rNPRU +gsRxbpC43Wa+7LawlpUvMX78a6F1w1B5TlMPtlYnLiF4PuZ1PBgw+QaeqLN77tII7 CkkgiBVuBRr9Q1v7vZclSqKGZvsYqxlqopkrhz5pBg1/K9ir3yTlY79d3PdHmIR8Ul K5vuoeDUnIpoKfJw9PJCYsGa9zynD2l6q1IA1pvjhRJTVuny/jud8z3JCe3WT7YBRX kydfI7MPdesW3X2XFn7UkpYNV1hhotqcpmkmfTX/qal+HYMLZNegLXW/6hR0vmNVJc Y/FBx6erKXXHg== Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:06:23 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Joey Gouly , Branislav Rankov , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] arm64/mte: Document ABI for asymmetric mode Message-ID: <20220216170622.GA10784@willie-the-truck> References: <20220127195712.748150-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20220127195712.748150-2-broonie@kernel.org> <20220215181422.GA8748@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220216_090630_808354_9CA90BE4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.57 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 04:36:22PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 06:14:23PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:57:09PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > mode will be selected. Otherwise, one of the modes in the task's mode > > > set will be selected in a currently unspecified manner. > > > I think it's time we specified the "unspecified manner" now that we have > > three options. > > Are you happy with the manner that is implemented in the patch set or is > this purely a request for documenation? Sorry, yes, I'm just saying let's document what the code does, as that is what people will end up relying on. Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel