From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC93C433F5 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:10:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=RRVh4K/EiCne4MWDfaUhOZOdPOqLYUMxoSjnV4H/VxY=; b=NhIH5kVNeRsBt3 bqhY1oXbH0m5YKDIzCxff7vnH5r4z2D0f/XQiE7NGD1IRIEmZXbQk26irgAOzsKsDtJD7Koxyeah6 CIInK0knXetK2UKCn0/K5sr6NDKjDa9Zd6zgyojOIBo/yU6KLFNuzCNmYj3uSrGpNjg4wpoDtZi2v 8wOzxxSuI0ZwnYfaamTLBrgqKiT/wuLA2ukbz5O3PE56pdfm7vA9t/dITeotu/E30PKpnUSfkbeiy vDyE4PucjgZ+vVNpWMCd+pBH43FwypexE7S3cObrHmnin4kG16K2p3HhpzzLG3G+J5Woae/XrNTSL AjXzJtmysakvIJwOWXog==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nMS72-008tWp-Sr; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:09:41 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nMS6r-008tTY-0z for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:09:30 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F276B81977; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C53FC340E8; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:09:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1645524565; bh=AkOMylrV6IyH78gdwpdLXnR+lLhy+UuR1r9cOg7vTv8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EeJuOA9MMWhRwGKKnmM7zP24hfmdei6GulopQDZMPIO0oCztaFA/HTdCuTJ9/RZVR SN8i5ipn0A8n0wvIwkYLoXiblypyeMN3oyjcZ/TwtX0Lek52NdYZBhkH40ZQWJJHGC h08R2W+jni0/wzJo0qRYehz22AUgZDq/iM1nLI2QHUfEdm0K4v2f/lZliDXU6jPnky ky9nYSjw/oEmEHGcB+ZnX0Yv9l+hXU6nXC4691AizpENbLs/A9pdIM77V7DVI7Jp4C 0qNqHwHp+SV0BuDj5c7d714qBDQefiRsAYj9uq/2r46NXr27oNvvnYGBJSXzeXMvam 6Ox43yLguc6sA== Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:09:19 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, acme@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, broonie@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, jslaby@suse.cz, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] linkage: better symbol aliasing Message-ID: <20220222100918.GA16108@willie-the-truck> References: <20220216162229.1076788-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220222_020929_282162_8AA6E20C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.27 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Peter, On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:58:31AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 04:22:25PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Catalin, Will, Peter: I think this is ready now and would like to get it > > queued, but it looks like this may (trivially) conflict with other bits > > we'll want to queue in either the arm64 tree (Joey's string routine > > changes [4]), or tip tree (Peter's IBT series). > > > > I assume the best thing to do would be to have a stable branch merged in > > both of those. I've tagged this such that it can be pulled (details > > below); Peter also suggested he could make a stable branch in the tip > > tree. Any preference? > > No real preference, The conflicts on my end are really rather trivial > IIRC, but they're a nice clean-up. > > If I don't take then, feel free to add: > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Mark mentioned yesterday that this series will conflict with some pending rework to the arm64 string routines [1], so we probably want a shared branch to handle the fallout. Do you plan to queue this someplace in -tip that I can pull from, or shall I create a stable branch on the arm64 side? Cheers, Will [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220215170723.21266-1-joey.gouly@arm.com _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel