[PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192-mt6359: Fix error handling in mt8192_mt6359_dev_probe

[PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192-mt6359: Fix error handling in mt8192_mt6359_dev_probe

[Miaoqian Lin]

The device_node pointer is returned by of_parse_phandle()  with refcount
incremented. We should use of_node_put() on it when done.

This function only calls of_node_put() in the regular path.
And it will cause refcount leak in error paths.
Fix this by calling of_node_put() in error handling too.

Fixes: 4e28491a7a19 ("ASoC: mediatek: mt8192-mt6359: fix device_node leak")
Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
---
 .../mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c       | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c
index f7daad1bfe1e..ee91569c0911 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c
@@ -1116,8 +1116,10 @@ static int mt8192_mt6359_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	card = (struct snd_soc_card *)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
-	if (!card)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!card) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto put_platform_node;
+	}
 	card->dev = &pdev->dev;
 
 	hdmi_codec = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node,
@@ -1159,20 +1161,24 @@ static int mt8192_mt6359_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!priv)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (!priv) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto put_hdmi_codec;
+	}
 	snd_soc_card_set_drvdata(card, priv);
 
 	ret = mt8192_afe_gpio_init(&pdev->dev);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "init gpio error %d\n", ret);
-		return ret;
+		goto put_hdmi_codec;
 	}
 
 	ret = devm_snd_soc_register_card(&pdev->dev, card);
 
-	of_node_put(platform_node);
+put_hdmi_codec:
 	of_node_put(hdmi_codec);
+put_platform_node:
+	of_node_put(platform_node);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192-mt6359: Fix error handling in mt8192_mt6359_dev_probe

[Tzung-Bi Shih]

On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 01:52:22AM +0000, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
> The device_node pointer is returned by of_parse_phandle()  with refcount
> incremented. We should use of_node_put() on it when done.
> 
> This function only calls of_node_put() in the regular path.
> And it will cause refcount leak in error paths.
> Fix this by calling of_node_put() in error handling too.
> 
> Fixes: 4e28491a7a19 ("ASoC: mediatek: mt8192-mt6359: fix device_node leak")
> Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192-mt6359: Fix error handling in mt8192_mt6359_dev_probe

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 01:52:22 +0000, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
> The device_node pointer is returned by of_parse_phandle()  with refcount
> incremented. We should use of_node_put() on it when done.
> 
> This function only calls of_node_put() in the regular path.
> And it will cause refcount leak in error paths.
> Fix this by calling of_node_put() in error handling too.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192-mt6359: Fix error handling in mt8192_mt6359_dev_probe
      commit: e45ac7831ff3e2934d58cce319c17c8ec763c95c

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel