From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0971CC433F5 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 05:08:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=x3n7nOCF3869VoDS5WFA0xwjln5959bfgJqBTcl5WJA=; b=0nvSdzb/5bs3Ng IspMwWkBVb7F3xUXwQNKME//Kbe63I1bjy+/CtX21jwSInbwUa3HUhbkaF6cpfUltmwj8+iQePcvT cj32tQVPFWq+cptRcUdEuiLUe5kx59vP1MWhnPBEmHSiOW7yNXaZ0cOjMuKXIaiRfYVS5zlCWbt7m /5vl+VYe4cFnBz4dyhxpLvZ1/RA0yEOSJZLFezym29+Ywi1TVRlAHe01EU/Rx8nVJ9/NSJ5+oziLi a3dgTaDmnOnzzXVsF/3vGQrB92Vo5hUUvVxod/yxvHV1Jocv5JYbPJz2cIeCTXKKokgRMwTfPf1ga 7cz7/WttcL33q1y0YrwA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nSXUt-00F70m-OM; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 05:07:29 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nSXDM-00EzxH-MQ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 04:49:22 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42D80B82A7B; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 04:49:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85350C340EC; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 04:49:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1646974158; bh=ieKn790GjrKSPuQn2caaZWrzBmooKYSB6PRk5jmqHFQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RiCFEZwBuQmmlgqHA+kqM/K6eJdBD9xlftp7cCJ5OGOGTeIyz87Fuq0iGjyKcsQBL vBl7/JIVlxHBbL5/2DwFurRmzUKDbDDJDSAgMikQ8N1XkICyckwdAugEPNVo1fpCdR wy5s2Gdn/tqDbRW9VclshFIYtN0XHH7w6epPguo8= Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 20:49:17 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Michael Ellerman Cc: Christophe Leroy , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "alex@ghiti.fr" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] Convert powerpc to default topdown mmap layout (v8) Message-Id: <20220310204917.3d42e6cf3088f7cf1c7fe7a6@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <877d91m7wd.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> References: <877d91m7wd.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220310_204920_981195_CDF44311 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.27 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:26:42 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote: > > What will be the merge strategy ? I guess it's a bit late to get it > > through powerpc tree, so I was just wondering whether we could get > > patches 2 to 5 in mm this cycle, and the powerpc ones next cycle ? > > Yeah I didn't pick it up because the mm changes don't have many acks and > I'm always nervous about carrying generic mm changes. > > It would be my preference if Andrew could take 2-5 through mm for v5.18, > but it is quite late, so I'm not sure how he will feel about that. 5.18 isn't a problem. Perhaps you meant 5.17, which would be real tough. Can we take a look after 5.18-rc1? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel