From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Peng Liang <liangpeng10@huawei.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/25] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 writable
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 20:47:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220311044811.1980336-5-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220311044811.1980336-1-reijiw@google.com>
This patch adds id_reg_desc for ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 to make it writable by
userspace.
Return an error if userspace tries to set SVE/GIC field of the register
to a value that conflicts with SVE/GIC configuration for the guest.
SIMD/FP/SVE fields of the requested value are validated according to
Arm ARM.
Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 9 ++
3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 2c9d8c0a3b75..84edc87f0005 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -813,6 +813,7 @@
#define ID_AA64PFR0_ASIMD_SUPPORTED 0x0
#define ID_AA64PFR0_ELx_64BIT_ONLY 0x1
#define ID_AA64PFR0_ELx_32BIT_64BIT 0x2
+#define ID_AA64PFR0_GIC3 0x1
/* id_aa64pfr1 */
#define ID_AA64PFR1_MPAMFRAC_SHIFT 16
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 6305c2622c32..9e9fa90afb82 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -330,6 +330,87 @@ static void id_reg_desc_init(struct id_reg_desc *id_reg)
WARN_ON_ONCE(arm64_check_features_kvm(id, id_reg->vcpu_limit_val, val));
}
+static int validate_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct id_reg_desc *id_reg, u64 val)
+{
+ int fp, simd;
+ unsigned int gic;
+ bool vcpu_has_sve = vcpu_has_sve(vcpu);
+ bool pfr0_has_sve = id_aa64pfr0_sve(val);
+
+ simd = cpuid_feature_extract_signed_field(val, ID_AA64PFR0_ASIMD_SHIFT);
+ fp = cpuid_feature_extract_signed_field(val, ID_AA64PFR0_FP_SHIFT);
+ /* AdvSIMD field must have the same value as FP field */
+ if (simd != fp)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* fp must be supported when sve is supported */
+ if (pfr0_has_sve && (fp < 0))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* Check if there is a conflict with a request via KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT */
+ if (vcpu_has_sve ^ pfr0_has_sve)
+ return -EPERM;
+
+ if ((irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) &&
+ vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3)) {
+ gic = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val,
+ ID_AA64PFR0_GIC_SHIFT);
+ if (gic == 0)
+ return -EPERM;
+
+ if (gic > ID_AA64PFR0_GIC3)
+ return -E2BIG;
+ } else {
+ u32 id = reg_to_encoding(&id_reg->reg_desc);
+ u64 mask = ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_GIC);
+ int r = arm64_check_features_kvm(id, val & mask,
+ id_reg->vcpu_limit_val & mask);
+
+ if (r)
+ return r;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_desc(struct id_reg_desc *id_reg)
+{
+ u64 limit = id_reg->vcpu_limit_val;
+ unsigned int gic;
+
+ limit &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_AMU);
+ if (!system_supports_sve())
+ limit &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_SVE);
+
+ /*
+ * The default is to expose CSV2 == 1 and CSV3 == 1 if the HW
+ * isn't affected. Userspace can override this as long as it
+ * doesn't promise the impossible.
+ */
+ limit &= ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2) |
+ ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3));
+
+ if (arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED)
+ limit |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2), 1);
+ if (arm64_get_meltdown_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED)
+ limit |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3), 1);
+
+ gic = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(limit, ID_AA64PFR0_GIC_SHIFT);
+ if (gic > 1) {
+ /* Limit to GICv3.0/4.0 */
+ limit &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_GIC);
+ limit |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_GIC), ID_AA64PFR0_GIC3);
+ }
+ id_reg->vcpu_limit_val = limit;
+}
+
+static u64 vcpu_mask_id_aa64pfr0_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct id_reg_desc *idr)
+{
+ return vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) ? 0 : ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_SVE);
+}
+
static int validate_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
const struct id_reg_desc *id_reg, u64 val)
{
@@ -1263,20 +1344,6 @@ static u64 read_id_reg_with_encoding(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
val = read_kvm_id_reg(vcpu->kvm, id);
switch (id) {
- case SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1:
- if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
- val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_SVE);
- val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_AMU);
- val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2);
- val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2), (u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2);
- val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3);
- val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3), (u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv3);
- if (irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) &&
- vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3) {
- val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_GIC);
- val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_GIC), 1);
- }
- break;
case SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1:
if (!kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm))
val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE);
@@ -1375,48 +1442,6 @@ static unsigned int sve_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return REG_HIDDEN;
}
-static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
- const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
-{
- const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
- u8 csv2, csv3;
- int err;
- u64 val;
-
- err = reg_from_user(&val, uaddr, id);
- if (err)
- return err;
-
- /*
- * Allow AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2 to be set from userspace as long as
- * it doesn't promise more than what is actually provided (the
- * guest could otherwise be covered in ectoplasmic residue).
- */
- csv2 = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT);
- if (csv2 > 1 ||
- (csv2 && arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() != SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- /* Same thing for CSV3 */
- csv3 = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3_SHIFT);
- if (csv3 > 1 ||
- (csv3 && arm64_get_meltdown_state() != SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- /* We can only differ with CSV[23], and anything else is an error */
- val ^= read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, false);
- val &= ~((0xFUL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT) |
- (0xFUL << ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3_SHIFT));
- if (val)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2 = csv2;
- vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv3 = csv3 ;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
/* cpufeature ID register user accessors */
static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
@@ -1736,8 +1761,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
/* AArch64 ID registers */
/* CRm=4 */
- { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1), .access = access_id_reg,
- .get_user = get_id_reg, .set_user = set_id_aa64pfr0_el1, },
+ ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1),
ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,2),
ID_UNALLOCATED(4,3),
@@ -3102,8 +3126,22 @@ int kvm_set_id_reg_feature(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id, u8 field_shift, u8 fval)
return __modify_kvm_id_reg(kvm, id, val, preserve_mask);
}
+static struct id_reg_desc id_aa64pfr0_el1_desc = {
+ .reg_desc = ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1),
+ .ignore_mask = ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_GIC),
+ .init = init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_desc,
+ .validate = validate_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
+ .vcpu_mask = vcpu_mask_id_aa64pfr0_el1,
+};
+
+#define ID_DESC(id_reg_name, id_reg_desc) \
+ [IDREG_IDX(SYS_##id_reg_name)] = (id_reg_desc)
+
/* A table for ID registers's information. */
-static struct id_reg_desc *id_reg_desc_table[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM] = {};
+static struct id_reg_desc *id_reg_desc_table[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM] = {
+ /* CRm=4 */
+ ID_DESC(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, &id_aa64pfr0_el1_desc),
+};
static inline struct id_reg_desc *get_id_reg_desc(u32 id)
{
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index fc00304fe7d8..f0632b46fbf9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -117,6 +117,15 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
else
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.vgic.rd_regions);
+ if (type == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3)
+ /*
+ * Set ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.GIC to 1. This shouldn't fail unless
+ * any vCPU in the guest have started.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm_set_id_reg_feature(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
+ ID_AA64PFR0_GIC3,
+ ID_AA64PFR0_GIC_SHIFT));
+
out_unlock:
unlock_all_vcpus(kvm);
return ret;
--
2.35.1.723.g4982287a31-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-11 4:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-11 4:47 [PATCH v6 00/25] KVM: arm64: Make CPU ID registers writable by userspace Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [PATCH v6 01/25] KVM: arm64: Introduce a validation function for an ID register Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-22 7:42 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-23 6:06 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-23 7:05 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-24 6:00 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-24 7:37 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-29 1:57 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [PATCH v6 02/25] KVM: arm64: Save ID registers' sanitized value per guest Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-23 19:22 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-24 16:23 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-24 17:54 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-26 2:35 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-27 22:57 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-28 0:04 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [PATCH v6 03/25] KVM: arm64: Introduce struct id_reg_desc Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:47 ` Reiji Watanabe [this message]
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [PATCH v6 05/25] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [PATCH v6 06/25] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [PATCH v6 07/25] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [PATCH v6 08/25] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [PATCH v6 09/25] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64DFR0_EL1/ID_DFR0_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [PATCH v6 10/25] KVM: arm64: Make MVFR1_EL1 writable Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [PATCH v6 11/25] KVM: arm64: Add remaining ID registers to id_reg_desc_table Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-23 19:53 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-23 20:13 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 20:44 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-23 22:22 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-03-23 22:25 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-24 2:26 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-24 20:23 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-24 23:01 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-25 5:15 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-25 8:51 ` Oliver Upton
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [PATCH v6 12/25] KVM: arm64: Use id_reg_desc_table for ID registers Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:47 ` [PATCH v6 13/25] KVM: arm64: Add consistency checking for frac fields of " Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v6 14/25] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_CAP_ARM_ID_REG_CONFIGURABLE capability Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v6 15/25] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for ID register validation Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v6 16/25] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch cptr_el2 to track value of cptr_el2 for VHE Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v6 17/25] KVM: arm64: Use vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 to track value of mdcr_el2 Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v6 18/25] KVM: arm64: Introduce framework to trap disabled features Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v6 19/25] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v6 20/25] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v6 21/25] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v6 22/25] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v6 23/25] KVM: arm64: Trap disabled features of ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v6 24/25] KVM: arm64: Add kunit test for trap initialization Reiji Watanabe
2022-03-11 4:48 ` [PATCH v6 25/25] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce id_reg_test Reiji Watanabe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220311044811.1980336-5-reijiw@google.com \
--to=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=liangpeng10@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).