From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96C57C433EF for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2022 02:16:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-Id:Date:To:Cc:From:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=AqbTJ0hoZzX/bkI9t3O8nmeAXzS7UkV7WLMJ1YzzdPg=; b=cJ2YnRlkjSAQ7f +SjnxBUYmhYEvEnShUfFbABAddvla9qtE/lKoo1saoAf8DqRtVB/t8zMiLeD3lDdOoSdW6FxfV4nh zL1osZEuLYrIWbMSEcPvuq8nWABBhscOLFf+GDhL+eC1wEedfeBzN1CsQD1GAm3R67ee8QBDmt1na 2Qedm37GH26popEPP9EdjjrZCqe7sRWzsq/qQ2xNSF6b4TWyFNl/Y0zxfWc2ukZGZXZKSzWQZ+C+f +B4JCCjPYWXgpdtJ9HG+imGq3omnRpcKUaugqs8mc81aCKhtqPDBc+IXCaEiXeALJ4iAxh5Y6m99O 9w6QOa5w5ZIFujpFUttg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1naple-00ASR1-85; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 02:15:02 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1napla-00ASPP-G6; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 02:15:00 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A006FB80B54; Sun, 3 Apr 2022 02:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1296C340EE; Sun, 3 Apr 2022 02:14:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1648952094; bh=sqYLDU+fwXFcPGJInHBWfYzYzKNM+vXb4OU6AqfFR5Y=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=F1X32ELEee+RI/dSMDPAySBSdLkKwiVKCHLwRK5n527vp3R5wQkhrWukmjZxAJlP2 G5E8CV1QceJf6wlLaBr8GkYxgSSo4DblLao4ucsvUTOlUCqXCuwAn08wJc/2TCQIWx xu+/uC8oWHvbnAscyks5cgG3RW9t68reBjvRU4Bnb6Jj98dxOGlgJe4q4XqUGhPcAB P1spjwFMZ2cDzwUey3p6CwFZa8Sf14FWslTuDb317mGx2qudxtihxOWVe6HLyTHYvM BjALABzcu1IioUMsOFmHw7UA4djoZsrEAZLEIkWP1G2w17PNsYP5NkKvgoorj+GmIX 3XcLieuQlXJXA== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220401122839.nn74rtftvzgjqjrg@houat> References: <20220325161144.1901695-4-maxime@cerno.tech> <366a0232-bb4a-c357-6aa8-636e398e05eb@samsung.com> <20220330084710.3r6b5pjspz5hdmy6@houat> <20220331095456.dyyxsiu2b3yw2vvs@houat> <20220331153134.h3alp24hzquajkly@houat> <20220331215818.F11BEC340F0@smtp.kernel.org> <20220401122839.nn74rtftvzgjqjrg@houat> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: Drop the rate range on clk_put From: Stephen Boyd Cc: Tony Lindgren , Marek Szyprowski , Mike Turquette , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Osipenko , 'Linux Samsung SOC' , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Maxime Ripard Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2022 19:14:51 -0700 User-Agent: alot/0.10 Message-Id: <20220403021453.F1296C340EE@smtp.kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220402_191458_727599_097632AF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.88 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Quoting Maxime Ripard (2022-04-01 05:28:39) > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 02:58:17PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > I don't think clk_put() dropping a range request is very important right > > now. If this isn't fixed tomorrow then we should revert out this patch > > so systems can boot -rc1 and try to fix it in parallel. > > Yeah, it can definitely be reverted. I'm not so sure that the issue is > with this patch itself though but more that it now triggers a fault > reliably. > I don't see a revert sent yet so I'll send one now. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel