From: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] use more system keyrings to verify arm64 kdump kernel image signature
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:32:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220413093236.faudcucbhn5jwatk@Rk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220411084306.GY163591@kunlun.suse.cz>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 10:43:06AM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 09:52:18AM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 09:13:32AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>> > On 04/08/22 at 10:59am, Michal Suchánek wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:17:19PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>> > > > Hi Coiby,
>> > > >
>> > > > On 04/01/22 at 09:31am, Coiby Xu wrote:
>> > > > > Currently, a problem faced by arm64 is if a kernel image is signed by a
>> > > > > MOK key, loading it via the kexec_file_load() system call would be
>> > > > > rejected with the error "Lockdown: kexec: kexec of unsigned images is
>> > > > > restricted; see man kernel_lockdown.7".
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This patch set allows arm64 to use more system keyrings to verify kdump
>> > > > > kernel image signature by making the existing code in x64 public.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for updating. It would be great to tell why the problem is
>> > > > met, then allow arm64 to use more system keyrings can solve it.
>> > >
>> > > The reason is that MOK keys are (if anywhere) linked to the secondary
>> ^^^^^^^^^
>> platform?
>> > > keyring, and only primary keyring is used on arm64.
>>
>> Thanks Michal for providing the info! Btw, I think you made a typo
>> because MOK keys are linked to the platform keyring, right?
>
>No, I mean secondary, through this patchset:
>https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YhKP12KEmyqyS8rj@iki.fi/
Thanks for the info! This provides another approach to verify kernel
image's signature via the secondary keyring once the end-use chooses to
trust MOK keys by setting MokListTrustedRT.
>
>Apparently support for importing the MOK keys into the platform keyring
>also exists but I am not sure if this is upstream or downstream feature.
This is actually an upstream feature,
commit 15ea0e1e3e185040bed6119f815096f2e4326242
Author: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
Date: Thu Dec 13 01:37:56 2018 +0530
efi: Import certificates from UEFI Secure Boot
Secure Boot stores a list of allowed certificates in the 'db' variable.
This patch imports those certificates into the platform keyring. The shim
UEFI bootloader has a similar certificate list stored in the 'MokListRT'
variable. We import those as well.
Secure Boot also maintains a list of disallowed certificates in the 'dbx'
variable. We load those certificates into the system blacklist keyring
and forbid any kernel signed with those from loading.
[zohar@linux.ibm.com: dropped Josh's original patch description]
Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
>
>At any rate the MOK keys are not included in the primary keyring which
>is the only keyring currently in use for kexec on arm64.
Good summary, thanks!
>
>Thanks
>
>Michal
>
--
Best regards,
Coiby
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-13 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-01 1:31 [PATCH v5 0/3] use more system keyrings to verify arm64 kdump kernel image signature Coiby Xu
2022-04-01 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig Coiby Xu
2022-04-11 9:01 ` Michal Suchánek
2022-04-01 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic Coiby Xu
2022-04-11 8:54 ` Michal Suchánek
2022-04-14 1:46 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-01 1:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature Coiby Xu
2022-04-11 8:59 ` Michal Suchánek
2022-04-14 1:44 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-08 7:17 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] use more system keyrings to verify arm64 kdump " Baoquan He
2022-04-08 8:59 ` Michal Suchánek
2022-04-11 1:13 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-11 1:52 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-11 8:43 ` Michal Suchánek
2022-04-13 9:32 ` Coiby Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220413093236.faudcucbhn5jwatk@Rk \
--to=coxu@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox