From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59615C433F5 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:46:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=WkbkPsyG3ZcqGkSQaHy5PBRgUnjF8QGNz4QK7UYvdYs=; b=Ouohb31PNlBWff 4jO0phRMpD2IvOGXLj+zTUSfbt5E7+3acnbAX5caEsAJkRNHwFMr5dWNlauUmgx0vPJCXUGAETygM RH8ycyNxGrZGIq5oa/x7lVzdnrIssVAneJICzFEIkC1Y71g1wZhm1c++A8YvW1bsL0jecnc2I/u6p /uSoLA0niw8ODHhsh02ySTGSghLYm9pfFHL3HeQ6Rn2f4HJFHTcPY2oFUClMSitgmQVfNpuOQIAwN q0GJEvy93Zk050RHsByG3R+Jq7249bUunha9GJrjb2K+HOxJT6Ob9YVh2kMLuuLIIre9tpvf6LNjK q7H9BmE85eTsU93L2IwQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nefBN-001eHI-Om; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:45:25 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nefBK-001eGO-Am for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:45:23 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 23DFjArV099164; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:45:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1649864710; bh=LKiOhQpH11PRHnUk7E83nty6XMEWWedQyINcMzjxJ8k=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=SVEb3BmVQOgTig6W3fudXL+ubrtWwy2pakyL8YTIVC5bPMqE85CXrPIEtfwcPAxlw zo/X/4lE0+yAM9MoHbDCDkcuWQIRm12LbF8quvim9Q+WxywWZ+zgb0JDd2UfbyTfvk inJtvkeAV8u8eeK6tXf3T56YpKAs7bkmm7bmK1XQ= Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (dfle115.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.36]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 23DFjACd014238 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:45:10 -0500 Received: from DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:45:09 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:45:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 23DFj9VX015581; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:45:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:45:09 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Krzysztof Kozlowski CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Alexandre Belloni , Alessandro Zummo , , , , , Vignesh Raghavendra Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: rtc: Add TI K3 RTC devicetree bindings documentation Message-ID: <20220413154509.2bllkjdnp7r2f7fd@remindful> References: <20220412073138.25027-1-nm@ti.com> <20220412073138.25027-2-nm@ti.com> <20220412221743.vbectb4bcghau2b7@confider> <2609cb4e-df0e-f4b5-b89f-37287bbc569d@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2609cb4e-df0e-f4b5-b89f-37287bbc569d@linaro.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220413_084522_571863_720361DC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.12 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 08:42-20220413, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 13/04/2022 00:17, Nishanth Menon wrote: > >>> + assigned-clocks: > >>> + description: | > >>> + override default osc32k parent clock reference to the osc32k clock entry > >>> + maxItems: 1 > >>> + > >>> + assigned-clock-parents: > >>> + description: | > >>> + override default osc32k parent clock phandle of the new parent clock of osc32k > >>> + maxItems: 1 > >> > >> Usually assigned-clockXXX are not needed in the bindings. Is here > >> something different? They are put only to indicate something special. > > > > I wonder if I should rather use unevaluatedproperties instead? If I use > > additionalProperties: False, then the second example below fails. > > > > Are you sure it fails? I just checked and it worked in my case. This > AFAIR was working since some time (or fixed some time ago), so maybe > update your dtschema? Arrgh, Thanks and you are right. Apologies, I should have cross checked again since developing late last year (understood the min schema currently is 2022.3). Will fix this up in the repost v2 in a short while. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel