From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 690B1C433F5 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:58:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=9PSHP+ITV/PMV4Pa5p+Sq/17YvQcYUWqOKDsHnGnWWA=; b=IqdUfXoBmnqX8P 8jx0G5jKTfS+sl+NQHmK5aoDKv7libeJL3KAEoAjvj6DFVDtbeSE446MYeb0xfIRWgmKmUzcRyWxH ikf1jwB3Zb9mjXIo2YL8/Qm68pFcEGWNjjvz4/kKTLuY8tojOnTLRhDfTtAeqisEY0V+9ua2fdUQu BD6qGcQOrKn2PkAtAdagmY9DOZmGsjFLdZoAtOmFnfJdJsT5r+bGcg/AhVJF3myyc05zCDJ3p5bTk un1bh5vAzvzeKlWS28P2FPjZCsk0qv9LAdpmG5sM2+8MWwzDnnI4/IxO5vfHXCuyd+pmd1WSyK34G JxBQLijH1N+bshD5WotA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ngMGJ-00FuF8-So; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:57:31 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ngMGG-00FuEm-NW for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:57:30 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58870B80D86; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7003CC385A7; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 07:57:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1650268645; bh=b7GQE/+OBPXkgoj6+iT3PLf9vEfeClGLdfkCcGiZhFc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OgBrZg2Tj6hOmuGMl0sm2HzDN9mW5SMfRZF6b6u1GLZcxxBRf6eyMv9OuD0RN7IZc W3/RJT5toyhj99acG4+LD5KvcWbfbCksK2SQn0Uyuy2tkifcXey1JE4y9XzWXoRH5C vyNjqiHKHogqsmK03XFlCVDzDEXnrNQPy36M/CptBG5e5Mbd6bqxcJz+4zm82Qif9G LFbT8gz2MFDy08ZlU9yIVO2HVHxj9iPF2ux5+yS5fGtuH3Np7+PAGVfd42OYEXLbZE 1lGMZrvLRxK46PdxwP/zRkqHcqo8KWiPl5A83isojzY4JBdZZJ/DdOcsQbo4SkAM4f CCxu2HREkIm1w== Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 15:57:18 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Tim Harvey Cc: Rob Herring , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team , Device Tree Mailing List , Linux ARM Mailing List , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH] imx8mm-venice-gw7902: update pci refclk Message-ID: <20220418075718.GB391514@dragon> References: <20220405200625.19359-1-tharvey@gateworks.com> <20220411013106.GD129381@dragon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220418_005728_950993_1F00A7E9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.60 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 12:44:23PM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 6:31 PM Shawn Guo wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 01:06:25PM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote: > > > Use the correct PCI clock bindings. > > > > Please improve the commit log to explain why clock "pcie_phy" can be > > dropped. > > > > Shawn, > > The original PCIe bindings for this board were wrong - they were from > a version of the bindings that was not yet approved (my mistake) and > I'm just trying to bring them up to date. > > That said, I looked at the latest fsl,imx6q-pcie.yaml dt-bindings [1] > and see that there should be a min of 3 clocks called 'pcie', > 'pcie_bus', and 'pcie_phy'. However I notice that all of the current > imx8mm boards that enable PCI have clock-names of 'pcie', 'pcie_aux', > and 'pcie_bus'. It seems like all the imx8mm boards having pcie have > clock-names this way: > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-beacon-baseboard.dtsi > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dtsi > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-tqma8mqml-mba8mx.dts > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-venice-gw71xx.dtsi > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-venice-gw72xx.dtsi > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-venice-gw73xx.dtsi > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-venice-gw7901.dts > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-venice-gw7902.dts > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-venice-gw7903.dts > > Does the binding need to change or do the clock names need to change > in the above? If the bindings is approved/correct, device tree should match bindings. Shawn _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel