From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2948C433F5 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 15:54:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References: List-Owner; bh=m1eDrm42+TVcdKXrBWOabp8ahQnCfgxwknkXczT/DuM=; b=hIvvIfGpF8Nxsj UXyh43qaPc6qOOZKW6FBwU4dqBAMSqRFaoE4PnXYkSXL35ew1HoB9VKIxpAx94xJfYxCdB4zdPICI PDRpXnot25JZIgDsjX6B4s9IgP5BrHLgQG3I+l92KDgs2TZD74cRizQ9xyWUM/0ncStYJ06v4/K68 wv2+NJ0kxdPn+BB+Hpx4raOOMfeIyNQfr48z1bajPo3k9n1oESvCOIliDfw6cZ7b7a5X9iepz9MlV IWZjv5dAxU/bg9VlT8h1xTClDsoyAmF3unnz+q5IetunLz1t/Ld3Mvjwa6BlCs9Eem5HV00Lh+C8x dGYZUOsuXgt9HZv2UWOQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ngTgr-00HY8y-Gu; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 15:53:25 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ngTgn-00HY6z-Kf; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 15:53:22 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD4F4B80E5B; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 15:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C21CBC385A7; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 15:53:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1650297195; bh=aYZg1IKIfMQLIL0wtoZyeEOyQnwvMvDnvwNzngzlnjk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=WK68PO31YI8JAiYMovjg5uNw+os/75YZuU34TXqHwolxI1p74aZtz/bzsBeJS2o6U XDCctIZIIFQVilDavTUVHZhHWR2Jt1fHHFWCVOe9rbFvIcc8ciz81dubr4LrAZFhcs SMmcS5Wy/5EdOC0yQxaulXswLkjR+E8aaLGtAMAdcyivBNRa82nQFc4vIJExw+623B h7vEevp/8sv3hSOxVo0tj8mZXwgaTvgZZXZGbBZAxOvnL36BJrqIfgQ2QdrSyw6wm+ iGNO7pxMJ59IoujLcls/JavFPbWQgzTXlFp9O+q+v1H1DHwIPfHzX2vDJ6s8kJeCB8 VWvXOc4T0am/Q== Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 10:53:13 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Frank Wunderlich , Rob Herring Cc: Frank Wunderlich , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Vinod Koul , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Heiko Stuebner , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Bjorn Helgaas , Philipp Zabel , Johan Jonker , Peter Geis , Michael Riesch , linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: [RFC/RFT 4/6] PCI: rockchip-dwc: add pcie bifurcation Message-ID: <20220418155313.GA1101563@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220418_085321_858831_C1B1C92A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.22 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 11:08:02AM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 03:54:56PM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote: > > > From: Frank Wunderlich > > > > > > PCIe Lanes can be split to 2 slots with bifurcation. > > > Add support for this in existing pcie driver. > > Is the "rockchip,bifurcation" DT property something that should be > > generalized so it's not rockchip-specific? Other controllers are > > likely to support similar functionality. > > I do not know if other controllers support similar functionality, > but i ack a property without vendor prefix is better. Should i use > "bifurcation" as name or do you think about a different name which > is more generic? Really a question for Rob about what name would be good and where it should go. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel