From: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
james.morse@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, reijiw@google.com, ricarkol@google.com,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: arm64: Return a bool from emulate_cp()
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 23:53:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220425235342.3210912-2-oupton@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220425235342.3210912-1-oupton@google.com>
KVM indicates success/failure in several ways, but generally an integer
is used when conditionally bouncing to userspace is involved. That is
not the case from emulate_cp(); just use a bool instead.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 7b45c040cc27..36895c163eae 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -2246,27 +2246,27 @@ static void perform_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
* @table: array of trap descriptors
* @num: size of the trap descriptor array
*
- * Return 0 if the access has been handled, and -1 if not.
+ * Return true if the access has been handled, false if not.
*/
-static int emulate_cp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- struct sys_reg_params *params,
- const struct sys_reg_desc *table,
- size_t num)
+static bool emulate_cp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct sys_reg_params *params,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *table,
+ size_t num)
{
const struct sys_reg_desc *r;
if (!table)
- return -1; /* Not handled */
+ return false; /* Not handled */
r = find_reg(params, table, num);
if (r) {
perform_access(vcpu, params, r);
- return 0;
+ return true;
}
/* Not handled */
- return -1;
+ return false;
}
static void unhandled_cp_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -2330,7 +2330,7 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
* potential register operation in the case of a read and return
* with success.
*/
- if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, ¶ms, global, nr_global)) {
+ if (emulate_cp(vcpu, ¶ms, global, nr_global)) {
/* Split up the value between registers for the read side */
if (!params.is_write) {
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, Rt, lower_32_bits(params.regval));
@@ -2365,7 +2365,7 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
params.Op1 = (esr >> 14) & 0x7;
params.Op2 = (esr >> 17) & 0x7;
- if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, ¶ms, global, nr_global)) {
+ if (emulate_cp(vcpu, ¶ms, global, nr_global)) {
if (!params.is_write)
vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, Rt, params.regval);
return 1;
--
2.36.0.rc2.479.g8af0fa9b8e-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-25 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-25 23:53 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: Limit feature register reads from AArch32 Oliver Upton
2022-04-25 23:53 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2022-04-25 23:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: arm64: Don't write to Rt unless sys_reg emulation succeeds Oliver Upton
2022-04-25 23:53 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: arm64: Wire up CP15 feature registers to their AArch64 equivalents Oliver Upton
2022-04-25 23:53 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm64: Plumb cp10 ID traps through the AArch64 sysreg handler Oliver Upton
2022-04-25 23:53 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: Start trapping ID registers for 32 bit guests Oliver Upton
2022-04-26 9:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: Limit feature register reads from AArch32 Alexandru Elisei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220425235342.3210912-2-oupton@google.com \
--to=oupton@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox