From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: 王擎 <wangqing@vivo.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"vincent.guittot@linaro.org" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"dietmar.eggemann@arm.com" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add complex scheduler level for arm64
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 14:27:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220426132740.yhthgoazoolvlven@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SL2PR06MB30828131C046AB979BE75BD6BDFB9@SL2PR06MB3082.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 07:05:15AM +0000, 王擎 wrote:
>
> Hi Sudeep:
>
> I am thinking if it is possible to add a complex level cpu topology
> between cluster and SMT?
>
> We can describe it directly in “cpu-map”, instead of parsing it through
> the cache info.
>
I don't know or understand what you mean by that. Do you have a proposal
for DT bindings ? Please post the patch with details on the motivation for
the change to help us understand your proposal. I can't comment much without
seeing or understanding your proposal at this moment.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-26 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-22 11:51 [PATCH V2 0/2] Add complex scheduler level for arm64 Qing Wang
2022-04-22 11:51 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] arch_topology: support for parsing cache topology from DT Qing Wang
2022-04-22 12:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-04-24 2:53 ` [PATCH V2 RESEND " 王擎
2022-04-22 11:51 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] arm64: Add complex scheduler level for arm64 Qing Wang
2022-04-22 12:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-04-24 2:26 ` 王擎
2022-04-26 18:15 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-25 13:19 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] " Jonathan Cameron
2022-04-26 3:06 ` 王擎
2022-04-26 7:05 ` 王擎
2022-04-26 13:27 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220426132740.yhthgoazoolvlven@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=wangqing@vivo.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox