From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99795C433EF for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 15:07:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=aaUv9uZFHIyqnrtRlvssIShy62wVONsL2A6Gh7+9tU0=; b=YN3wgjFkVpDl5s aTfCBvyRJCaCIkkgmIwln47zpFJVehvpCOqHpFss+2Cx4kdzJlfJJ810++o2ugz3cg0goKE5gOF9y QmQTcud+DyaerE6bbgKWYDFG7zHAc4cmBBTQalNoVw6XHN6eD3Vzqn/zZ8D6ePy6pNZ3dXBYgsRXr UQ5t5mzhHKyiOu8B/qCmugew2xSH0DP8ejnMxjLHiwT3rdSGfOmdldwikP7lzKvEdGy56J9O1EM7D 4bW9ppuZuiYkPJNNSEOya2s/DLqKqs5D57aPd63NDVwQGOiyAI/0XEkeiTL5ZqS1/eSnbL9zBA8wJ Bl01LZiER7rXMeKjBbxQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1no4xy-00Ezl1-AW; Mon, 09 May 2022 15:06:31 +0000 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([46.235.227.227]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1no4x1-00Ez8f-6I; Mon, 09 May 2022 15:05:32 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: nfraprado) with ESMTPSA id 9355F1F441A4 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1652108725; bh=jwx7aoAOlo/IJzWJjPvpl/xGpjbHcHsD07r0sZmj1yw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=n/4nJIvMOj5TT2NzwztqbxeysgjE5CI478h4wmebsMpDRzoIVTxsDchO+oiTYWCiI Bzg4sk/GWak+7NvQQ42YzSfavD5nj0lANWuukpPi+bepSoaSP78RTUbh/uZB1XC4kN aLQld3NcAGSH55Sc67tAAZBAmAJybBE6JktNuTKhLRJgJNHeqW9q7jKCbGT+tTZ9Wg CdoTa1kCmp49YK82c/w4GWdbvHVh3ctGY54Yx421gzvUqlEKfPi0Zl83OtvsqsQak1 RaPU151VNrRhR2Aoe+NfL8U/7vR+VMqVvc/jqe8JsKUyzuojOiE0Ma5Pw2MTWcOCOY nuW65r2mHlW3A== Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 11:05:17 -0400 From: =?utf-8?B?TsOtY29sYXMgRi4gUi4gQS4=?= Prado To: Tzung-Bi Shih Cc: Bjorn Andersson , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , kernel@collabora.com, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Mathieu Poirier , Matthias Brugger , Rob Herring , Tinghan Shen , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: Make l1tcm reg exclusive to mt819x Message-ID: <20220509150517.ij5lev2mlcem2epx@notapiano> References: <20220506213226.257859-1-nfraprado@collabora.com> <20220506213226.257859-2-nfraprado@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220509_080531_492167_4F8C18B3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.05 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 10:27:18AM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 5:32 AM N=EDcolas F. R. A. Prado > wrote: > > + - if: > > + properties: > > + compatible: > > + enum: > > + - mediatek,mt8192-scp > > + - mediatek,mt8195-scp > > + then: > > + properties: > > + reg: > > + minItems: 3 > > + maxItems: 3 > > + reg-names: > > + items: > > + - const: sram > > + - const: cfg > > + - const: l1tcm > = > "l1tcm" should be optional. Does it make more sense by using "minItems: = 2"? Hi Tzung-Bi, thank you for the information. I did notice from the driver code that l1tcm= was treated as optional for mt8192, but since I wasn't sure if that was intende= d, I kept it as required for the mt8192/mt8195 binding, since making it optional later wouldn't break the ABI, but the opposite would. But yes, since it is indeed optional for those platforms, I will lower minI= tems to 2 for them in the next version. Thanks, N=EDcolas _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel