From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E374FC433EF for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 14:53:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=qJf7n94FKyh0AuhAewt1dkejDTk0mot4SxLy6mVl7EA=; b=063ca+HkpWWgDD ZtjbBQHiDEak2hGCjvIQPPctn4TQIwam/d8VDcanthjpSe/7bNr2QPKLfXVuQt8fHwTxa2/YuHoX8 w5pBgjHdqu5jrNOFROwS66etmhX95mJCXwq5FDfOUg3HZJszI5rS8QWKjWrjBLfTgkUWp2vBuf/Bb +o7d+RgG6zwf9MWr2X8KDKe+rexTjN9gpjZud/JApFgsgsbA1w+iMmLuBpGQP/aBN3Z+8eUZHers5 4iZWuqxibhGmngQpYCAhXngkR7PJvwI9F5cvQBEVSz4lwQdrMZP6M/NH8ib2FA/Js4BD6zROsXWpf +/t2KQwhJ5/QaSKZF7DA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1noRDU-002baG-Fy; Tue, 10 May 2022 14:52:00 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1noRDR-002bZ6-QW for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 10 May 2022 14:51:59 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F5912FC; Tue, 10 May 2022 07:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.0.250]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 517053F73D; Tue, 10 May 2022 07:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 15:51:48 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Carsten Haitzler Cc: Mark Brown , carsten.haitzler@arm.com, soc@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Liviu Dudau , Robin Murphy Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable modules for arm displays Message-ID: <20220510145148.ty3yfniwolpafmej@bogus> References: <20220509125510.152114-1-carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com> <20220510111545.uqatdfthc6lv5p7i@bogus> <20220510120756.gcosdydmccbytmrn@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220510_075157_943771_0C364002 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.89 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:34:00PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > On 5/10/22 13:07, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:27:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:15:45PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > > > > While at it, can we get these too enabled which are needed on JUNO IIUC. > > > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA998X > > > > CONFIG_DRM_I2C_NXP_TDA9950 > > > > > > > Liviu/Robin who use HDLCD more than me on Juno can confirm if these are > > > > needed or not. I seem to have these for some HDLCD clock testing using SCMI. > > > > > > Those two, especially TDA998x, are very widely used so should probably > > > just be enabled anyway regardless of what's on Juno. > > > > Indeed, Robin mentioned the same. I am just adding it blindly every time > > I need to test HDLCD without noticing any warnings. > > > > Yup - those were already there. I was just adding these for our new Morello > board - all it needed was I2C Cadence enabled as a module and presto... it > "just works". As it's just a module it's not really a bad "cost" so > defconfig additions seemed the right thing to do. Just chasing up this patch > as I sent it earlier this year and it was not merged or denied... :) Was it sent to soc@kernel.org earlier as well ? If so, let me know. I am not sure if the SoC team expects this to come from some platform maintainer or atleast an ack from them so that they can pick up. We can just say it is need for Arm Ltd platforms and provide an ack(me or Liviu). -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel