From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To: Ivan Ivanov <iianov@suse.de>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>,
Guillaume Gardet <Guillaume.Gardet@arm.com>,
"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@suse.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
"bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] clk: bcm: rpi: Add support for three more clocks
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 10:53:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220512085347.lu3cyeiitfsgaljn@houat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EA46E084-07A4-4BC9-B9FB-A64102F03867@suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1408 bytes --]
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:10:00AM +0300, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 12 May 2022, at 10:57, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 08:10:50AM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> >> Am 10.05.22 um 15:30 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:20:18PM +0000, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
> >>>> May I ask what's the status/plan of this patch series?
> >>> As far as I know it hasn't been merged yet.
> >>>
> >>>> It seems it has not been merged yet, and I know we are a bit late in
> >>>> the 5.18 schedule, but I think this is a good fix for 5.18.
> >>> Fix for what? I don't think this series fix any bug?
> >>
> >> This seems to be a "fix" for the Frankenstone scenario: mainline kernel +
> >> vendor DT
> >
> > Did we ever support this?
> >
> > I don't think we did, so even though it can be nice to improve that
> > situation, I don't think it's worth sending this to stable
>
> Yes, maybe not stable material, but considering support for devices
> which are shipped with upstream Linux and vendor device tree blobs,
> saved somewhere on them, should be pretty normal to expect, right?
Not really?
If the vendor in question uses a binding that has never been reviewed,
accepted, and supported by upstream, then I don't see what upstream
should be doing to accommodate for that situation?
Maxime
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-12 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-28 6:57 [PATCH v4 0/3] clk: bcm: rpi: Add support for three more clocks Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-04-28 6:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] clk: bcm: rpi: Add support HEVC clock Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-04-28 6:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] clk: bcm: rpi: Handle pixel clock in firmware Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-04-28 6:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] clk: bcm: rpi: Add support for VEC clock Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-04-28 8:03 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-05-10 13:20 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] clk: bcm: rpi: Add support for three more clocks Guillaume Gardet
2022-05-10 13:30 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-05-11 6:10 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-05-12 7:57 ` Maxime Ripard
[not found] ` <EA46E084-07A4-4BC9-B9FB-A64102F03867@suse.de>
2022-05-12 8:53 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2022-07-10 11:12 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-07-11 7:02 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-07-11 11:55 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-08-23 22:54 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-05-26 11:36 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2022-06-21 15:30 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220512085347.lu3cyeiitfsgaljn@houat \
--to=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=Guillaume.Gardet@arm.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=iianov@suse.de \
--cc=iivanov@suse.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox