From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8356AC433F5 for ; Fri, 13 May 2022 02:59:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Lj+MdPEM/UXfhRaYIQ0KPBfhLnTKF1TIw1Yu6Ni8xsM=; b=cgdwvw9GsifT1v Hylith8BY5YbwxFKZCXsVs2XXjsKdTf3VRYi3ZrzyTsvMmLSz77zbj6ejcelkH1Roba/MuxDDC5l7 I0Z+xL5vRrpHtQzwGggh/5URTxZXebCFY5wA84fa71t+L6h9EwYoa7AtU3qIZJSVO16JIvH8GeG3v Adma7TkY/+kypWuQJsGFuuj0ubliI7cGipuRtHnz+o5KaEXdl8z3Y4+HZSzLq/v8KKQQHk5rJ5VN1 Xw2asTQQbHtc1rN1BNoG+EBpaRdzbUtnplqkm1HG4KUEG8S4rJ9KsZLyazTqBZYqhhemJqIrvT1jR GubpZbS3oesXxM9HvwbA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1npLVl-00EFWS-BP; Fri, 13 May 2022 02:58:37 +0000 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1npLVh-00EFUM-Az for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 13 May 2022 02:58:35 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1652410713; x=1683946713; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=SzQgBpjRtY7+OjO4z70O/XdgIcbGLvWzeSJ5axqI1Zc=; b=TJENPnNuJQ//tPUAuEjLXmgI9vMHFyIwOpsp9lrKqk05tn9uqgWmtfQv 4GDgZZUsDzNIgdgdGYa/CI/q+Unpb/VlvyNhmgOC1dgHRycqWxuj0/50S qLSYvoz2+80boBa5wNIio/ipXJAh1Q68gEXu66ZYLtq1/bn0qg/4a7vG8 HRjusYOURMyMNsodGFTMbWDZUGVwW8PXmFPlFxJtNcHT7zx3VFjiSvm8L 2cDw06w7eVxlBE3xiPaAlg0/fem1jx1DF6YCbPXKq1MMb0DeEuWlQ6i3X JU7W6OQ5z9O+SPXeZ68+DqT5ev1Z16ucpUOKdvgpgmf39xyyfsiHRyrpw g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10345"; a="356625868" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,221,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="356625868" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 May 2022 19:58:31 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.91,221,1647327600"; d="scan'208";a="698316119" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 5056e131ad90) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2022 19:58:27 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 5056e131ad90 with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1npLVa-000LEO-Op; Fri, 13 May 2022 02:58:26 +0000 Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 10:57:48 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Gaosheng Cui , catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, pcc@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, keescook@chromium.org, daniel.kiss@arm.com Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangweiyang2@huawei.com, gongruiqi1@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] arm64: add missing header dependencies Message-ID: <202205131035.qIYEFTpo-lkp@intel.com> References: <20220509061751.3434059-1-cuigaosheng1@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220509061751.3434059-1-cuigaosheng1@huawei.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220512_195833_452269_A8B8B8CC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.65 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Gaosheng, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on next-20220506] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Gaosheng-Cui/arm64-add-missing-header-dependencies/20220509-142946 base: 38a288f5941ef03752887ad86f2d85442358c99a config: arm64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220513/202205131035.qIYEFTpo-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/05d29bfe89ad4e7205d77fcdd8199dd6544ff784 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Gaosheng-Cui/arm64-add-missing-header-dependencies/20220509-142946 git checkout 05d29bfe89ad4e7205d77fcdd8199dd6544ff784 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.3.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 prepare If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): scripts/genksyms/parse.y: warning: 9 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr] scripts/genksyms/parse.y: warning: 5 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr] scripts/genksyms/parse.y: note: rerun with option '-Wcounterexamples' to generate conflict counterexamples In file included from include/linux/ipc.h:7, from include/uapi/linux/sem.h:5, from include/linux/sem.h:5, from include/linux/sched.h:15, from include/linux/sched/task_stack.h:9, from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:31, from include/linux/mutex.h:19, from include/linux/kernfs.h:11, from include/linux/sysfs.h:16, from include/linux/kobject.h:20, from include/linux/of.h:17, from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35, from include/linux/acpi.h:13, from include/acpi/apei.h:9, from include/acpi/ghes.h:5, from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8, from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10: >> include/linux/rhashtable-types.h:88:41: error: field 'mutex' has incomplete type 88 | struct mutex mutex; | ^~~~~ In file included from include/linux/hrtimer.h:20, from include/linux/sched.h:19, from include/linux/sched/task_stack.h:9, from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:31, from include/linux/mutex.h:19, from include/linux/kernfs.h:11, from include/linux/sysfs.h:16, from include/linux/kobject.h:20, from include/linux/of.h:17, from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35, from include/linux/acpi.h:13, from include/acpi/apei.h:9, from include/acpi/ghes.h:5, from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8, from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10: include/linux/seqlock.h: In function '__seqprop_mutex_sequence': >> include/linux/seqlock.h:277:86: error: implicit declaration of function 'mutex_lock' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:151:33: note: in definition of macro '__SEQ_LOCK' 151 | #define __SEQ_LOCK(expr) expr | ^~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:277:1: note: in expansion of macro 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME' 277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/seqlock.h:277:76: error: implicit declaration of function 'mutex_unlock'; did you mean 'write_unlock'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock)) | ^~~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:151:33: note: in definition of macro '__SEQ_LOCK' 151 | #define __SEQ_LOCK(expr) expr | ^~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:277:1: note: in expansion of macro 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME' 277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h: In function '__seqprop_mutex_assert': >> include/linux/lockdep.h:282:61: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct mutex' 282 | #define lockdep_is_held(lock) lock_is_held(&(lock)->dep_map) | ^~ include/linux/seqlock.h:151:33: note: in definition of macro '__SEQ_LOCK' 151 | #define __SEQ_LOCK(expr) expr | ^~~~ include/linux/lockdep.h:306:14: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN_ON' 306 | do { WARN_ON(debug_locks && !(cond)); } while (0) | ^~~~~~~ include/linux/lockdep.h:312:9: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_assert' 312 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/lockdep.h:312:24: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_is_held' 312 | lockdep_assert(lockdep_is_held(l) != LOCK_STATE_NOT_HELD) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:245:20: note: in expansion of macro 'lockdep_assert_held' 245 | __SEQ_LOCK(lockdep_assert_held(lockmember)); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:277:1: note: in expansion of macro 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME' 277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h: In function 'read_seqbegin': >> include/linux/seqlock.h:330:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_relax' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 330 | cpu_relax(); \ | ^~~~~~~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:344:25: note: in expansion of macro '__read_seqcount_begin' 344 | unsigned _seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:359:9: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_read_seqcount_begin' 359 | raw_read_seqcount_begin(s); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:836:24: note: in expansion of macro 'read_seqcount_begin' 836 | unsigned ret = read_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/sched/task_stack.h:9, from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:31, from include/linux/mutex.h:19, from include/linux/kernfs.h:11, from include/linux/sysfs.h:16, from include/linux/kobject.h:20, from include/linux/of.h:17, from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35, from include/linux/acpi.h:13, from include/acpi/apei.h:9, from include/acpi/ghes.h:5, from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8, from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10: include/linux/sched.h: At top level: >> include/linux/sched.h:1227:41: error: field 'futex_exit_mutex' has incomplete type 1227 | struct mutex futex_exit_mutex; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/sched.h:1232:41: error: field 'perf_event_mutex' has incomplete type 1232 | struct mutex perf_event_mutex; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/sched.h:1512:41: error: field 'thread' has incomplete type 1512 | struct thread_struct thread; | ^~~~~~ In file included from include/vdso/processor.h:10, from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:36, from include/linux/mutex.h:19, from include/linux/kernfs.h:11, from include/linux/sysfs.h:16, from include/linux/kobject.h:20, from include/linux/of.h:17, from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35, from include/linux/acpi.h:13, from include/acpi/apei.h:9, from include/acpi/ghes.h:5, from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8, from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10: >> arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/processor.h:10:20: warning: conflicting types for 'cpu_relax'; have 'void(void)' 10 | static inline void cpu_relax(void) | ^~~~~~~~~ >> arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/processor.h:10:20: error: static declaration of 'cpu_relax' follows non-static declaration In file included from include/linux/hrtimer.h:20, from include/linux/sched.h:19, from include/linux/sched/task_stack.h:9, from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:31, from include/linux/mutex.h:19, from include/linux/kernfs.h:11, from include/linux/sysfs.h:16, from include/linux/kobject.h:20, from include/linux/of.h:17, from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35, from include/linux/acpi.h:13, from include/acpi/apei.h:9, from include/acpi/ghes.h:5, from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8, from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10: include/linux/seqlock.h:330:17: note: previous implicit declaration of 'cpu_relax' with type 'void(void)' 330 | cpu_relax(); \ | ^~~~~~~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:344:25: note: in expansion of macro '__read_seqcount_begin' 344 | unsigned _seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:359:9: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_read_seqcount_begin' 359 | raw_read_seqcount_begin(s); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:836:24: note: in expansion of macro 'read_seqcount_begin' 836 | unsigned ret = read_seqcount_begin(&sl->seqcount); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/mutex.h:19, from include/linux/kernfs.h:11, from include/linux/sysfs.h:16, from include/linux/kobject.h:20, from include/linux/of.h:17, from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35, from include/linux/acpi.h:13, from include/acpi/apei.h:9, from include/acpi/ghes.h:5, from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8, from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10: >> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:70: warning: "TASK_SIZE_OF" redefined 70 | #define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) (test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_32BIT) ? \ | In file included from include/linux/sched/task_stack.h:9, from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:31, from include/linux/mutex.h:19, from include/linux/kernfs.h:11, from include/linux/sysfs.h:16, from include/linux/kobject.h:20, from include/linux/of.h:17, from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35, from include/linux/acpi.h:13, from include/acpi/apei.h:9, from include/acpi/ghes.h:5, from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8, from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10: include/linux/sched.h:2248: note: this is the location of the previous definition 2248 | #define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) TASK_SIZE | In file included from include/linux/kernfs.h:11, from include/linux/sysfs.h:16, from include/linux/kobject.h:20, from include/linux/of.h:17, from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35, from include/linux/acpi.h:13, from include/acpi/apei.h:9, from include/acpi/ghes.h:5, from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8, from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10: >> include/linux/mutex.h:218:13: warning: conflicting types for 'mutex_unlock'; have 'void(struct mutex *)' 218 | extern void mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/hrtimer.h:20, from include/linux/sched.h:19, from include/linux/sched/task_stack.h:9, from arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:31, from include/linux/mutex.h:19, from include/linux/kernfs.h:11, from include/linux/sysfs.h:16, from include/linux/kobject.h:20, from include/linux/of.h:17, from include/linux/irqdomain.h:35, from include/linux/acpi.h:13, from include/acpi/apei.h:9, from include/acpi/ghes.h:5, from include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8, from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10: include/linux/seqlock.h:277:76: note: previous implicit declaration of 'mutex_unlock' with type 'void(struct mutex *)' 277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock)) | ^~~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:151:33: note: in definition of macro '__SEQ_LOCK' 151 | #define __SEQ_LOCK(expr) expr | ^~~~ include/linux/seqlock.h:277:1: note: in expansion of macro 'SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME' 277 | SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(mutex, struct mutex, true, s->lock, mutex, mutex_lock(s->lock)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:122: arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1 make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors. make[1]: *** [Makefile:1284: prepare0] Error 2 make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors. make: *** [Makefile:226: __sub-make] Error 2 make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors. vim +/cpu_relax +10 arch/arm64/include/asm/vdso/processor.h f511e079177a9b Vincenzo Frascino 2020-03-20 9 f511e079177a9b Vincenzo Frascino 2020-03-20 @10 static inline void cpu_relax(void) f511e079177a9b Vincenzo Frascino 2020-03-20 11 { f511e079177a9b Vincenzo Frascino 2020-03-20 12 asm volatile("yield" ::: "memory"); f511e079177a9b Vincenzo Frascino 2020-03-20 13 } f511e079177a9b Vincenzo Frascino 2020-03-20 14 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel