From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC66DC433F5 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:08:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=CQ+FIbaSrWtdw/0Qhj650lexAACXusJEBFp+e7BtCfg=; b=IjFQ+cfRFYMgwm 7shcO7gAcgxHt4QdDQ4eqL5DMPwIhrTsjfs9tkBE6kl/bYOjzK7XaRUTG7o+lNROuIaYQudzEuMCq 4MwB+UxBMNpX+/23VTzltp5+HJuGOuJyQ6fLNzm6bLjNf2D7AGC25shqMey5aKc+jt+0gmg1RTDmk Yx46LihPYgcqJ18XB/hu5kRZIxN0itCwlGi6068ZHuvRMgdVuLd5R2SbqKnBnwYH5RpagB6v4x9ss fKYFCr1FJA8KZQr0lO4KDQLxJf+642yEm0cK/svsEVEiZ/UKy7/xDth7qB4DDQ4y9KqBjIP6uzDNN 5F3lvdlLm4KSh9QeI7SA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nwN8l-00FxO7-2H; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 12:07:55 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nwN8e-00FxKQ-NY; Wed, 01 Jun 2022 12:07:53 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA1F1FB; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 05:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.9.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B3E93F73D; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 05:07:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 13:06:58 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Gavin Shan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Atish Patra , Atish Patra , Sudeep Holla , Vincent Guittot , Morten Rasmussen , Dietmar Eggemann , Qing Wang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/16] arch_topology: Drop LLC identifier stash from the CPU topology Message-ID: <20220601120658.2x737nhyxmodoo7t@bogus> References: <20220525081416.3306043-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-5-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-6-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-7-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-8-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-9-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20220525081416.3306043-10-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <3860bfcc-a323-c031-0fdd-77001d338bec@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3860bfcc-a323-c031-0fdd-77001d338bec@redhat.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220601_050748_831895_B589C733 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.34 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 11:35:20AM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > > On 5/25/22 4:14 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Since the cacheinfo LLC information is used directly in arch_topology, > > there is no need to parse and store the LLC ID information only for > > ACPI systems in the CPU topology. > > > > Remove the redundant LLC ID from the generic CPU arch_topology information. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla > > --- > > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 1 - > > include/linux/arch_topology.h | 1 - > > 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > How about merge the changes to PATCH[08/16]? I don't see why we need put > the changes into separate patches. > It took a while to remember as I was with the same opinion as yours but decided to split them for one reason: to keep arch specific change in a separate patch(if that becomes a need due to some conflict or some other non-technical reason) -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel