linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6qdl: correct PU regulator ramp delay
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 16:47:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220611084746.GE254723@dragon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511160823.1436562-1-l.stach@pengutronix.de>

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 06:08:23PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Contrary to what was believed at the time, the ramp delay of 150us is not
> plenty for the PU LDO with the default step time of 512 pulses of the 24MHz
> clock. Measurements have shown that after enabling the LDO the voltage on
> VDDPU_CAP jumps to ~750mV in the first step and after that the regulator
> executes the normal ramp up as defined by the step size control.
> 
> This means it takes the regulator between 360us and 370us to ramp up to
> the nominal 1.15V voltage for this power domain. With the old setting of
> the ramp delay the power up of the PU GPC domain would happen in the middle
> of the regulator ramp with the voltage being at around 900mV. Apparently
> this was enough for most units to properly power up the peripherals in the
> domain and execute the reset. Some units however, fail to power up properly,
> especially when the chip is at a low temperature. In that case any access
> to the GPU registers would yield an incorrect result with no way to recover
> from this situation.
> 
> Change the ramp delay to 380us to cover the measured ramp up time with a
> bit of additional slack.
> 
> Fixes: 40130d327f72 ("ARM: dts: imx6qdl: Allow disabling the PU regulator,
>                      add a enable ramp delay")
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>

Applied, thanks!

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-11  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-11 16:08 [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6qdl: correct PU regulator ramp delay Lucas Stach
2022-05-11 18:38 ` Francesco Dolcini
2022-06-11  8:47 ` Shawn Guo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220611084746.GE254723@dragon \
    --to=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).