From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D71FC433EF for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:17:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-Id:Date:To:Cc:From:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ErIcWHkscBOfTBMJtfXU4hhWiwmhM1E2DU7JKJh18Tc=; b=iVSFnld8uHGfRu rbbDdgYG7gJXxRXYS7VJm85qRnNzZLVdTWq1sV6JCyHbZwrrKxFsCyrS67NatSqmQMJdQhsECActW EovTtQOc+GiDKmI8zEoPhn1JUsYUrOLdPc1e1fqqn7jj+7ozPqvD3tl3h965n5sgcyPJvXIfazAet 3bmlqzWPG7h3zsLS/42Srwoeztnen0cp1OxAVodMBWU0yAVynvqCGveOPs5zy74amyktNyhhcW6lT LcDdB+MW1kplb8gIpQQ2axYOpeRb1IQyVSYgSONPz67x+9zg5It/OgGZI/DPkW3PpCZHKbJWHT3nh 7jp//eslyI3mQwjWvxpg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o1dBG-00H5F4-Fc; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:16:14 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o1dBA-00H5DO-1v for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:16:09 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 827AEB82200; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4C3CC3411A; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:16:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1655338564; bh=7xw4zYqYFvfxhUoOifisZKHl++dFmLd4PcqfRUqa/sk=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=FoYRptaTA4eILvxfUD3hRuHBvbNhqr/MjNMvLsPcMNzOFbb11dWCEcobjG8HIpTd0 8uhLzswKmmV1eito7KTLwV/nLRpmbzfhuuGGgm2cJbRui1/kIWc3WWzTfwacWd26lJ dDee8mteVqxKepphBQEQanqpqmSRoei/kEznMJvi3LEeeATghorLq3nrDCZ/w8ZgUT jGjZZuo7NWAjZCmuq2de/KkOOD8rl5pFzpE2SrcU7Szf/6S3EvSNCa29suP2rlwUZh i6YqOTttypszIv9tC6Eo034NPNhE/8I0DZO0Y+gC9fs5Rxab8+prMCEL6A9niq8ppf xiqxU844EAyFw== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20220609132902.3504651-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> <20220609132902.3504651-4-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] clk: imx93: Correct the edma1's parent clock From: Stephen Boyd Cc: abel.vesa@nxp.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jacky Bai , Peng Fan To: Abel Vesa , Peng Fan (OSS) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 17:16:02 -0700 User-Agent: alot/0.10 Message-Id: <20220616001604.D4C3CC3411A@smtp.kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220615_171608_296865_87F807E9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.38 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Quoting Abel Vesa (2022-06-15 14:39:27) > On 22-06-09 21:28:58, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > > From: Jacky Bai > > > > For EDMA1 in AONMIX, its parent clock should be from cm33_root, > > so Correct it. > > > > Fixes: 24defbe194b65("clk: imx: add i.MX93 clk") > > Reviewed-by: Peng Fan > > The reviews done internally do no count in upstream. > I think that's the rule. So drop the R-b tags from all patches. > Keep only the S-o-b tags. Is it any different code from what is sent upstream here? If not any different then I don't think anything is stopping the review tags from being kept. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel