From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: efi: Simplify arch_efi_call_virt() macro by using typeof()
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:56:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220629085619.jqujeyvsffxi6i6p@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXHyRgT0mM5+r6Gd0ww5ADB9coDGbuYY8KCQJibTJdzBSQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 07:58:38PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 16:09, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 03:57:38PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 15:47, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> > > >
> ...
>
> > > > I am yet to figure out how asm/efi.h and linux/efi.h are included so that
> > > > we can have generic definition in linux/efi.h and x86 can undefine that
> > > > and redefine its own version.
> > > >
> > > > Does that make sense ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I appreciate the effort, but for now, let's just fix the ones we need
> > > to fix (and the ARM one too while we're at it). PRM can only be
> > > enabled on x86 and arm64 anyway.
> >
> > True. OK then I will just update ARM version and leave loongarch as is.
> >
>
> Actually, this was rather straight-forward so I folded this change
> into your ARM patch.
I see you have the generic version for all archs except arm64 and x86 as
we discussed earlier. Since you have even included the arm64 changes, the
PRMT enablement patches need to routed via your tree now as it depends on
the change you have in your -next.
Are you OK with that if Rafael agrees ? I can ask him on the other thread.
No further changes are needed. Let me know.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-29 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-28 12:59 [PATCH] ARM: efi: Simplify arch_efi_call_virt() macro by using typeof() Sudeep Holla
2022-06-28 13:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-06-28 13:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-06-28 13:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-06-28 14:09 ` Sudeep Holla
2022-06-28 17:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-06-29 8:56 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2022-06-29 8:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-06-29 9:02 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220629085619.jqujeyvsffxi6i6p@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox