linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
	vz@mleia.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	p.rosenberger@kunbus.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	lukas@wunner.de, jirislaby@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] dt_bindings: rs485: Correct delay values
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 14:38:27 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220705203827.GA2583869-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220703170039.2058202-6-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>

On Sun, 03 Jul 2022 19:00:35 +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
> 
> Currently the documentation claims that a maximum of 1000 msecs is allowed
> for RTS delays. However nothing actually checks the values read from device
> tree/ACPI and so it is possible to set much higher values.
> 
> There is already a maximum of 100 ms enforced for RTS delays that are set
> via the uart TIOCSRS485 ioctl. To be consistent with that use the same
> limit for DT/ACPI values.
> 
> Although this change is visible to userspace the risk of breaking anything
> when reducing the max delays from 1000 to 100 ms should be very low, since
> 100 ms is already a very high maximum for delays that are usually rather in
> the usecs range.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/rs485.yaml | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-05 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-03 17:00 [PATCH v2 0/9] Fixes and cleanup for RS485 Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-03 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] serial: core: only get RS485 termination GPIO if supported Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-03 18:27   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-04  9:01     ` Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-04  9:55   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2022-07-04 15:07     ` Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-03 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] serial: core, 8250: set RS485 termination gpio in serial core Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-03 18:31   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-04  9:25     ` Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-04  9:51   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2022-07-04 15:13     ` Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-03 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] serial: core: move sanitizing of RS485 delays into own function Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-03 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] serial: core: sanitize RS485 delays read from device tree Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-03 18:34   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-04  9:08     ` Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-03 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] dt_bindings: rs485: Correct delay values Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-03 18:36   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-05 20:38   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2022-07-03 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] serial: 8250_dwlib: remove redundant sanity check for RS485 flags Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-03 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] serial: ar933x: Fix check for RS485 support Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-03 18:39   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-04  9:21     ` Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-04  9:53       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2022-07-03 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] serial: ar933x: Remove redundant assignment in rs485_config Lino Sanfilippo
2022-07-03 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] serial: 8250: lpc18xx: Remove redundant sanity check for RS485 flags Lino Sanfilippo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220705203827.GA2583869-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=p.rosenberger@kunbus.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vz@mleia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).