From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB24AC43334 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 12:32:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=fHYdbNY8OOayDurgN/Rh0B7XJ59LHaCxFPERgDn2V0c=; b=ctS/tHE7DXq5wv bGjAlPqo5Iz+lEGv6tujxsj6SPssiqU+aA97wiMYr19WJsdWO/N84V2+l4pziTpbHYKyybof0Jyy+ hyZEIaZdTcIcmoVoOK3Nq6BANCc8atE7UQ4ycKCva6m8lEEz2Sm2cIav1ZtMqVMvBFXLqdlwVgfCV EEoNxQbsEWT98F3+CCzBE5qoLm7V4gbH6vS+e/5+vVbcF8wAmZ/GCfvk2PRc7nBngwsdezKiZz9l/ dT82wpusw0JRKDT3MKHBgJcm46HgS8tXhidlfLmafjG4bghxrTr1p9WxVY+OPezl6nQgBR/kJeMfh afzXne2IbuCtQ7H1hBQA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o94Br-009w4B-KD; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 12:31:35 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1o94Bo-009w3L-EO for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 12:31:33 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5DF1B81CD1; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 12:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43F24C3411C; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 12:31:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1657110689; bh=FkOzRRaCg8g1b6CDz+WZmX3BYS39FULPDoML5S8RLAA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=u+j5NLlACF2MuZoSRaKG3UtZBwacG7xgzZPKLobqxh9TBLaxg4VEPIyxiKj+RiidA hQvtFChrImW5PTRFSNt3pe+nGBPlHljv/bTECL3G9T3XrbxNbQxHIF27jIClAOfxFI NVtR0IjYYZenmpz6YRU9mf1kxKBqiS6Qijtri1Isv2tW9lr/4xRUb2gIRxo4GfZ17t uuWqe6+bPK2O2ySLO2k9RY29unEc6v7rlGEU+K/yxHt3/dMsrWaH7z2cf+9AZAS3eg wzUEE4jtgYnAMwaCbLjNzzyQtTYLUAfpkdMsi21m04uSLS3YP39SfbvbdmL3nQJA2s inqNXk0OmjFZg== Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 13:31:24 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: "Ivan T. Ivanov" Cc: Catalin Marinas , Mark Brown , Mark Rutland , "Madhavan T . Venkataraman" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] arm64: Add stack unwinder unit tests Message-ID: <20220706123124.GJ2403@willie-the-truck> References: <20220624141000.88120-1-iivanov@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220624141000.88120-1-iivanov@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220706_053132_665577_19167154 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.19 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 05:09:59PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > Here is my initial arm64 unwinder test support. Code is based on s390 > unwinder tests, while errors introduced are mine. I am hopping that it > will be useful for testing and validating upcoming arm64 > arch_stack_walk_reliable() support. Thanks for doing this! Tests are always welcome. Since you based this on the s390 code, how much scope is there for moving the tests out of the arch/ directories and unifying them somewhere like kselftest or lkdtm so that other archs can benefit too? Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel