linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
Cc: "Jim Quinlan" <jim2101024@gmail.com>,
	"open list:PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS"
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Nicolas Saenz Julienne" <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Cyril Brulebois" <kibi@debian.org>,
	"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] PCI: brcmstb: Split brcm_pcie_setup() into two funcs
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 14:04:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220708190420.GA364925@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+-6iNzQZVi8MbyeZNcBzE0hGjGiYSUk3riSXxTALtFyC00aPQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 09:29:27AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 5:56 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 12:27:22PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > > We need to take some code in brcm_pcie_setup() and put it in a new function
> > > brcm_pcie_linkup().  In future commits the brcm_pcie_linkup() function will
> > > be called indirectly by pci_host_probe() as opposed to the host driver
> > > invoking it directly.
> > >
> > > Some code that was executed after the PCIe linkup is now placed so that it
> > > executes prior to linkup, since this code has to run prior to the
> > > invocation of pci_host_probe().
> >
> > This says we need to move some code from brcm_pcie_setup() to
> > brcm_pcie_linkup(), but not *why* we need to do that.
> I will elaborate in the commit message.
> >
> > In brcm_pcie_resume(), they're called together:
> >
> >   brcm_pcie_resume
> >     brcm_pcie_setup
> >     brcm_pcie_linkup
> >
> > In the probe path, they're not called together, but they're in the
> > same order:
> >
> >   brcm_pcie_probe
> >     brcm_pcie_setup
> >     pci_host_probe
> >       ...
> >         brcm_pcie_add_bus               # bus->ops->add_bus
> >           brcm_pcie_linkup
> >
> > Is there something that must happen *between* them in the probe path?
> 
> Yes.  In the probe() case, we must do things in this order:
> 
> 1. brcm_pcie_setup()
> 2. Turn on regulators
> 3. brcm_pcie_linkup()

Ah, I see, both 2) and 3) happen in brcm_pcie_add_bus:

  brcm_pcie_add_bus                    # bus->ops->add_bus
    pci_subdev_regulators_add_bus
      regulator_bulk_enable            # turn on regulators
    brcm_pcie_linkup

> Since the voltage regulators are turned on during enumeration,
> pci_host_probe() must be invoked prior to 3.  Before regulators, we
> did not care.

I guess in the pre-regulator case, i.e., pcie->sr not set, the power
for downstream devices must always be on.

> In the resume case, there is no enumeration of course but our driver
> has a handle to the regulators and can turn them on/off w/o help.

And I guess we don't need brcm_pcie_setup() in the resume path because
suspend turns off power only for downstream devices, not for the root
port itself, so the programming done by brcm_pcie_setup() doesn't need
to be done again.

> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220106160332.2143-5-jim2101024@gmail.com
> > > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++----------
> > >  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > > index e61058e13818..2bf5cc399fd0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
> > > @@ -926,16 +926,9 @@ static inline int brcm_pcie_get_rc_bar2_size_and_offset(struct brcm_pcie *pcie,
> > >
> > >  static int brcm_pcie_setup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> > >  {
> > > -     struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie);
> > >       u64 rc_bar2_offset, rc_bar2_size;
> > >       void __iomem *base = pcie->base;
> > > -     struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
> > > -     struct resource_entry *entry;
> > > -     bool ssc_good = false;
> > > -     struct resource *res;
> > > -     int num_out_wins = 0;
> > > -     u16 nlw, cls, lnksta;
> > > -     int i, ret, memc;
> > > +     int ret, memc;
> > >       u32 tmp, burst, aspm_support;
> > >
> > >       /* Reset the bridge */
> > > @@ -1025,6 +1018,40 @@ static int brcm_pcie_setup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> > >       if (pcie->gen)
> > >               brcm_pcie_set_gen(pcie, pcie->gen);
> > >
> > > +     /* Don't advertise L0s capability if 'aspm-no-l0s' */
> > > +     aspm_support = PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1;
> > > +     if (!of_property_read_bool(pcie->np, "aspm-no-l0s"))
> > > +             aspm_support |= PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S;
> > > +     tmp = readl(base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY);
> > > +     u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, aspm_support,
> > > +             PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY_ASPM_SUPPORT_MASK);
> > > +     writel(tmp, base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY);
> > > +
> > > +     /*
> > > +      * For config space accesses on the RC, show the right class for
> > > +      * a PCIe-PCIe bridge (the default setting is to be EP mode).
> > > +      */
> > > +     tmp = readl(base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3);
> > > +     u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, 0x060400,
> > > +                       PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3_CLASS_CODE_MASK);
> > > +     writel(tmp, base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3);
> > > +
> > > +     return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int brcm_pcie_linkup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie);
> > > +     struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
> > > +     void __iomem *base = pcie->base;
> > > +     struct resource_entry *entry;
> > > +     struct resource *res;
> > > +     int num_out_wins = 0;
> > > +     u16 nlw, cls, lnksta;
> > > +     bool ssc_good = false;
> > > +     u32 tmp;
> > > +     int ret, i;
> > > +
> > >       /* Unassert the fundamental reset */
> > >       pcie->perst_set(pcie, 0);
> > >
> > > @@ -1075,24 +1102,6 @@ static int brcm_pcie_setup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
> > >               num_out_wins++;
> > >       }
> > >
> > > -     /* Don't advertise L0s capability if 'aspm-no-l0s' */
> > > -     aspm_support = PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1;
> > > -     if (!of_property_read_bool(pcie->np, "aspm-no-l0s"))
> > > -             aspm_support |= PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S;
> > > -     tmp = readl(base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY);
> > > -     u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, aspm_support,
> > > -             PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY_ASPM_SUPPORT_MASK);
> > > -     writel(tmp, base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_LINK_CAPABILITY);
> > > -
> > > -     /*
> > > -      * For config space accesses on the RC, show the right class for
> > > -      * a PCIe-PCIe bridge (the default setting is to be EP mode).
> > > -      */
> > > -     tmp = readl(base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3);
> > > -     u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, 0x060400,
> > > -                       PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3_CLASS_CODE_MASK);
> > > -     writel(tmp, base + PCIE_RC_CFG_PRIV1_ID_VAL3);
> > > -
> > >       if (pcie->ssc) {
> > >               ret = brcm_pcie_set_ssc(pcie);
> > >               if (ret == 0)
> > > @@ -1281,6 +1290,10 @@ static int brcm_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
> > >       if (ret)
> > >               goto err_reset;
> > >
> > > +     ret = brcm_pcie_linkup(pcie);
> > > +     if (ret)
> > > +             goto err_reset;
> > > +
> > >       if (pcie->msi)
> > >               brcm_msi_set_regs(pcie->msi);
> > >
> > > @@ -1398,6 +1411,10 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >       if (ret)
> > >               goto fail;
> > >
> > > +     ret = brcm_pcie_linkup(pcie);
> > > +     if (ret)
> > > +             goto fail;
> > > +
> > >       pcie->hw_rev = readl(pcie->base + PCIE_MISC_REVISION);
> > >       if (pcie->type == BCM4908 && pcie->hw_rev >= BRCM_PCIE_HW_REV_3_20) {
> > >               dev_err(pcie->dev, "hardware revision with unsupported PERST# setup\n");
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel



> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-08 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-01 16:27 [PATCH v1 0/4] PCI: brcmstb: Re-submit reverted patchset Jim Quinlan
2022-07-01 16:27 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] PCI: brcmstb: Split brcm_pcie_setup() into two funcs Jim Quinlan
2022-07-06 21:56   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-08 13:29     ` Jim Quinlan
2022-07-08 19:04       ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-07-08 19:40         ` Jim Quinlan
2022-07-08 19:59           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-08 20:38             ` Jim Quinlan
2022-07-08 22:27               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-01 16:27 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] PCI: brcmstb: Add mechanism to turn on subdev regulators Jim Quinlan
2022-07-06 23:12   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-08 14:14     ` Jim Quinlan
2022-07-08 19:07       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-01 16:27 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] PCI: brcmstb: Add control of subdevice voltage regulators Jim Quinlan
2022-07-06 23:13   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-08 15:16     ` Jim Quinlan
2022-07-08 19:09       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-01 16:27 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] PCI: brcmstb: Do not turn off WOL regulators on suspend Jim Quinlan
2022-07-01 20:58 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] PCI: brcmstb: Re-submit reverted patchset Florian Fainelli
2022-07-05 20:55   ` Cyril Brulebois
2022-07-05 21:00     ` Florian Fainelli
2022-07-05 21:28       ` Cyril Brulebois
2022-07-05 22:06         ` Jim Quinlan
2022-07-15 18:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-07-15 18:30   ` Jim Quinlan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220708190420.GA364925@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jim2101024@gmail.com \
    --cc=kibi@debian.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).