From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 307B1C433EF for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 23:25:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=WN1IcLGs3ae4Df0p3whN7t2kCoXKH5th/CqDAQK6zb0=; b=4tzAe682VQ602m 9bP95hKvqENLy3zuWTIdo2NT8ipEKsSJkAVdJaC3ya29tTRVfvmrJyFXYPb0LLr4ZS432zkpoighu /XmChUvm0wcdBQUiNiWzegahW/DUJ4MdqnkK6ysJa5hg/0omO1qTrrVutqHTYAn7nh8cw6RtQf5v1 2PohCmevb0qwD0XKFDW1fCGaNiMmUVxgBPAutoivTHZF6sSZKldqY4QmZt8jck3AnE15eQOcv6HN6 nLMp8jITOhg3t6pyx7Ktyxh7oep3HhdYNOc0lyOLX9vRYlBfCbFrO6mu0oOT9yNifjAfdPokBB7Og sGD1hhkyAt0HuDvZhUCw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oCUfG-00B75I-Q7; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 23:24:08 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oCULq-00Ay32-VV; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 23:04:04 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD46061E16; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 23:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C86AC3411E; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 23:04:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1657926241; bh=d5MdTIonHKWdt36P0nVxTI+b57TowJdCD+NWNZoxFjY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NRGAL6F9qARXkFTmXPKo6vvIUI1rkoJKmL3xGFujpMcLr6eZUq8WPs/tyvHX72U9v FCFUyRqEgosieEN+wSJJj0N/BwjZg2oUVm6WWq0ZqewAGOBN+JRg+xDbWDeclL456q Bxq4Ht84JmYDsDf+01/glb0/6+CnbnvozOA1tGdCVwm558XnCge2GF2bagOxZkZJFy 6zy6cx6ou3oP4NvPOII0LZaXw9fv0N0aya2A7bLNIdWqLkKCiNvzblkdqt17j5+GBk 9OmrkHEWeSAuiMV8yLQU6jqX2j7SxDUhXW02GL3LrIHJoJpxDi+k2KQo9vmKZ3lQSJ sxq0MQRa0dwjA== Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 16:03:59 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: Vladimir Oltean , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Alexandre Belloni , Alvin =?UTF-8?B?xaBpcHJhZ2E=?= , Andy Shevchenko , Claudiu Manoil , Daniel Scally , "David S. Miller" , DENG Qingfang , Eric Dumazet , Florian Fainelli , George McCollister , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Hauke Mehrtens , Heikki Krogerus , Kurt Kanzenbach , Landen Chao , Linus Walleij , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beh=FAn?= , Matthias Brugger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sakari Ailus , Sean Wang , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Vivien Didelot , Woojung Huh Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: dsa: always use phylink Message-ID: <20220715160359.2e9dabfe@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20220715171719.niqcrklpk4ittfvl@skbuf> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220715_160403_115218_CE855CAE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.80 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:59:24 +0100 Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > The only thing that delayed them was your eventual comments about > re-working how it was being done. Yet again, posting the RFC series > created very little in the way of feedback. I'm getting to the point > of thinking its a waste of time posting RFC patches - it's counter > productive. RFC means "request for comments" but it seems that many > interpret it as "I can ignore it". I'm afraid you are correct. Dave used to occasionally apply RFC patches which kept reviewers on their toes a little bit (it kept me for sure). These days patchwork automatically marks patches as RFC based on the subject, tossing them out of "Action required" queue. So they are extremely easy to ignore. Perhaps an alternative way of posting would be to write "RFC only, please don't apply" at the end of the cover letter. Maybe folks will at least get thru reading the cover letter then :S _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel