From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45757C433EF for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:17:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=LUU/CkLzN5zhzpi14dEs3yVQjDSaKHbl+N1eAcL9kHQ=; b=jFiD13aTvjWp0i wg4extufzZBXItS+0VKIQ8QcpriAXxntlMKnavj/bnQeMvqL/l7M6hS5yljOiLCBImtHX7LUU6//j hiye5s5LhVuqeO6oPPGJ67F2jlZC1xPxSoj5Qk6HoQqL/fHonmvatf9Bx+DuTzsdGBxU1+0vCrwws 8z4Uc0nHswkMmnY2b70ApKE8RLPl9Jv699/7P3+j5Sdy09XAIitN+s/OZ72xbkywdl5asUMi5X9Ws esMai8LTAy9qzaazNmHcRprSYC52s9ROXDruKm9zWLDo5IvGS64qDP4xBJCz5P0QUBwtqSD8RLXNr gnUB/tl6dI1HHB7wylCA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oCfmD-00FfbD-4u; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:16:01 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oCfmA-00FfZ8-AO; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:15:59 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id z23so13044222eju.8; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 04:15:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=GSuKOTkU3shP0EBSGkZH4bPjOmCNN0weweRSI39rxR4=; b=LmTfJY0C2KyehmNxK1ghGj/zlJEMylOOKJbogqEpNjvqB6ZH0PxovI/7v+v1fOSdBC M6iw1J/y0vD6r7uFeq3sB9GKHprjqIq5Ct6xVM81/IQgLMAMwDzAUlwWt7Wi3lPo3/Y4 tLfI8OhFHzxN6JSMmA//PC68Do/mdkZKDiTpB1cUYgH3fw9dTMlSqhWy+FEh5GxM2PkQ ZS2ctOw7eNQFgnRDTINyhdA4ZroolRfCl8MMF5IQ/oJQUl2nlJV2FHgIGCO/77oLldmp o31Nm7kIK0HoIH24IY9VAOR+r6keNDGQZ9n5NNFvpkPQSkKJoI0HxALT5rPnX9zqcYGN 8jhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=GSuKOTkU3shP0EBSGkZH4bPjOmCNN0weweRSI39rxR4=; b=XMXoQPtvC4SwD1ouF4csuavY9KroAUP5QIaLcqJTAdM0NhZelh5jUf2HfAIbNytttM Ar0n2Y5UgYnXRgnzsTRqKGkb/U+481KpHKcqbeDTAQeq0bs0xAma5sYvawvzTGURp8mV PX2J+LE1HgOHdrs7F/pLwpTKUEGavSfwKpkXS0JEbcusK7D37L+RoPtPJhiDyFEWXSQ1 nIoyD7FKp//SJDjjCFrZ6eDYC4Q+ISNFK8Z0R2FE75p+JujihBxeEC5NmGdbMQxEilvA A3SX02DQDQ9zNHMgy0jCMA9RO6U9r6tYUu4GqMk0u9v9rcscdz9gRRbylrTvWkeVatYb NO5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+4DaUZAkgttEwxHZdELDQOJc7lpSHzmUHztsV/0WDLFa+WotmX Ay+al1mMnvuz03D+Ymqdaow= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sLb4uqrhY6SDkuMORlJ7TVbmlpoUkrp8ICgwzrq8QuVsTAX0TDXJWnC5I3SzDQW8/0IZykNQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8461:b0:72e:e3f5:373b with SMTP id hx1-20020a170906846100b0072ee3f5373bmr10571972ejc.199.1657970155263; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 04:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.25.231.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2-20020a170906218200b006fefd1d5c2bsm3128699eju.148.2022.07.16.04.15.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 16 Jul 2022 04:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:15:51 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Alexandre Belloni , Alvin =?utf-8?Q?=C5=A0ipraga?= , Andy Shevchenko , Claudiu Manoil , Daniel Scally , "David S. Miller" , DENG Qingfang , Eric Dumazet , Florian Fainelli , George McCollister , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Hauke Mehrtens , Heikki Krogerus , Kurt Kanzenbach , Landen Chao , Linus Walleij , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Marek =?utf-8?B?QmVow7pu?= , Matthias Brugger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sakari Ailus , Sean Wang , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Vivien Didelot , Woojung Huh Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: dsa: always use phylink Message-ID: <20220716111551.64rjruz4q4g5uzee@skbuf> References: <20220715171719.niqcrklpk4ittfvl@skbuf> <20220715160359.2e9dabfe@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220715160359.2e9dabfe@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220716_041558_402454_AC31BB19 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.36 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 04:03:59PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:59:24 +0100 Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > The only thing that delayed them was your eventual comments about > > re-working how it was being done. Yet again, posting the RFC series > > created very little in the way of feedback. I'm getting to the point > > of thinking its a waste of time posting RFC patches - it's counter > > productive. RFC means "request for comments" but it seems that many > > interpret it as "I can ignore it". > > I'm afraid you are correct. Dave used to occasionally apply RFC patches > which kept reviewers on their toes a little bit (it kept me for sure). > These days patchwork automatically marks patches as RFC based on > the subject, tossing them out of "Action required" queue. So they are > extremely easy to ignore. > > Perhaps an alternative way of posting would be to write "RFC only, > please don't apply" at the end of the cover letter. Maybe folks will > at least get thru reading the cover letter then :S Again, expressing complaints to me for responding late is misdirected frustration. The fact that I chose to leave my comments only when Russell gave up on waiting for feedback from Andrew doesn't mean I ignored his RFC patches, it just means I didn't want to add noise and ask for minor changes when it wasn't clear that this is the overall final direction that the series would follow. I still have preferences about the way in which this patch set gets accepted, and now seems like the proper moment to express them. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel