From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FACFC433EF for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:15:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=cazYb9A2iW5r964mc/8pc3u9HpTyotKTxz/ImkGRyVA=; b=n1FSZ0hbN0N5mD wwSzFYUpHA8sA/ozECPy8Wd4E+AHzS4Z/Rqact3CSz0JJYYxOoERc/4PwUYiWd5tuxl+4RsizvtR1 WABHHzp2K/NofYcT2x1+ZPF5ciBXSjYct2tvMg7DypGByMX+x1iYdGeLj2BYyDZzVDAyq+b5pzV85 GFlPCOyYCswWfgyPzn9XUcNCeEbHoibnCkymMVGFgNy55YEvXLlCkisEyQ+3xARGokMRTRZuF7TAO jWf/Ge8hu9kn3iapWiCLnov+F8t3eiDo4NHXA9czipAjhf3/e/AQUHvEcB+J40oEm20/72Iwdaoy6 HD/aVunBBBzAPCjFzW7g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oChcO-00GCYr-Qp; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:14:00 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oChcJ-00GCV9-G0; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:13:59 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id va17so13454051ejb.0; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=vypCuEq/rCX9HvlkITtGSPUFoDxSLRPZn98T+qV3Xf4=; b=WjA5VfCC/rZXpbOeSX9aHYmBGP49eby3ugoPBRHLpX5UQxvaT/LsKYkLfAIFJtNSGd ca1rd41z4niKpWi5tihqGcMdIdgzf+++E86A0mPqYKnHofAEF+Jbo2LcVRyh5Qq4a7HV +POutI91tGrQq1pj6ZraycCRcfSRfXZ+/h9Dg6SjBqtdgD7/09e3VSyN8KdPzF+gTmFQ mwZ8nFqh2whpQExmhq+sIyGjsw8m/1lz3zX1rH89jSw7++GBy7EZBVdVesFaxfqMwf+f sGWjTuslkljUN/35i8ZAkIOev5RTwINOlmLBOpKCG+YG8AVNRVkl2Hu0jGZmW/EyHMvB fMIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=vypCuEq/rCX9HvlkITtGSPUFoDxSLRPZn98T+qV3Xf4=; b=E6/OB+iAHouxnfQMR84ItZXnCyATXEYLgeRiEBFAqzXNEuVYocpgvkKIcXFIngKGNw 4lkWV0qJQkykTGsGAakE2u1qf3FzqKdNo5ICs30dCXs6y2HfCzY2lrmENCq8qHOGdOr6 MU0jSvxtgH9/lf6pzK+G/NCZliwlqkFqjuj+9639isfB8ccWjKJzVpcprpzu+WU0zwzS m1xElXJX00ysNaXkZ0ApociIIJ359+1Pg/1x8jYYRlNzAVimJyCLIZUl0SCqbDA87FKm Zz9U29vmM5xKzAg2OeqgeRWnOjiAFbAuK7F6fNSPB230lrZ3Ay8WGUvLuEqKUBotJs2G +ihg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9qFeYG9pY3DJfXubWqzQfKw7wst/iKpz8STU4WvdPTYeR3Bwwt XDFLEEezGztNP8KpPhJIo98= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1v6lwArwzwqDjUSKayn7lfOf6YdBDjzkR+KmWYHKQQRa+FZwUV3F3Eo1RWzpX/X4H1xYJfwPg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6d01:b0:72f:53f:7a25 with SMTP id sa1-20020a1709076d0100b0072f053f7a25mr6177694ejc.126.1657977229200; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 06:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.25.231.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jl10-20020a17090775ca00b0072ed9efc9dfsm3203279ejc.48.2022.07.16.06.13.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 16 Jul 2022 06:13:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 16:13:45 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Alexandre Belloni , Alvin =?utf-8?Q?=C5=A0ipraga?= , Andy Shevchenko , Claudiu Manoil , Daniel Scally , "David S. Miller" , DENG Qingfang , Eric Dumazet , Florian Fainelli , George McCollister , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Hauke Mehrtens , Heikki Krogerus , Kurt Kanzenbach , Landen Chao , Linus Walleij , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Marek =?utf-8?B?QmVow7pu?= , Matthias Brugger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sakari Ailus , Sean Wang , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Vivien Didelot , Woojung Huh Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: dsa: always use phylink Message-ID: <20220716131345.b2jas3rucsifli7g@skbuf> References: <20220715171719.niqcrklpk4ittfvl@skbuf> <20220715160359.2e9dabfe@kernel.org> <20220716111551.64rjruz4q4g5uzee@skbuf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220716_061355_559121_17E54EBB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.94 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 12:43:00PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > In the first RFC series I sent on the 24 June, I explicitly asked the > following questions: (...) > I even stated: "Please look at the patches and make suggestions on how > we can proceed to clean up this quirk of DSA." and made no mention of > wanting something explicitly from Andrew. > > Yet, none of those questions were answered. > > So no, Jakub's comments are *not* misdirected at all. Go back and read > my June 24th RFC series yourself: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/YrWi5oBFn7vR15BH@shell.armlinux.org.uk/ I don't believe I need to justify myself any further for why I didn't leave a comment on any certain day. I left my comments when I believed it was most appropriate for me to intervene (as someone who isn't really affected in any way by the changes, except for generally maintaining what's in net/dsa/, and wanting to keep a clean framework structure). Also, to repeat myself, blaming me for leaving comments, but doing so late, is not really fair. I could have not responded at all, and I wouldn't be having this unpleasant discussion. It begs the question whether you're willing to be held accountable in the same way for the dates on which you respond on RFC patches. > I've *tried* my best to be kind and collaborative, but I've been > ignored. Now I'm hacked off. This could have been avoided by responding > to my explicit questions sooner, rather than at the -rc6/-rc7 stage of > the show. I think you should continue to try your best to be kind and collaborative, you weren't provoked or intentionally ignored in any way, and it isn't doing these patches any good. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel