From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
kaleshsingh@google.com, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, tabba@google.com,
will@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: stacktrace: simplify unwind_next_common()
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 13:45:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220805124522.706457-2-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220805124522.706457-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Currently unwind_next_common() takes a pointer to a stack_info which is
only ever used within unwind_next_common().
Make it a local variable and simplify callers.
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h | 12 ++++++------
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 3 +--
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c | 4 +---
arch/arm64/kvm/stacktrace.c | 4 +---
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
index f58eb944c46fb..01dc9f44a24a7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
@@ -140,27 +140,27 @@ typedef bool (*on_accessible_stack_fn)(const struct task_struct *tsk,
struct stack_info *info);
static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
- struct stack_info *info,
on_accessible_stack_fn accessible,
stack_trace_translate_fp_fn translate_fp)
{
+ struct stack_info info;
unsigned long fp = state->fp, kern_fp = fp;
struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
if (fp & 0x7)
return -EINVAL;
- if (!accessible(tsk, fp, 16, info))
+ if (!accessible(tsk, fp, 16, &info))
return -EINVAL;
- if (test_bit(info->type, state->stacks_done))
+ if (test_bit(info.type, state->stacks_done))
return -EINVAL;
/*
* If fp is not from the current address space perform the necessary
* translation before dereferencing it to get the next fp.
*/
- if (translate_fp && !translate_fp(&kern_fp, info->type))
+ if (translate_fp && !translate_fp(&kern_fp, info.type))
return -EINVAL;
/*
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
* stack to another, it's never valid to unwind back to that first
* stack.
*/
- if (info->type == state->prev_type) {
+ if (info.type == state->prev_type) {
if (fp <= state->prev_fp)
return -EINVAL;
} else {
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
state->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(kern_fp));
state->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(kern_fp + 8));
state->prev_fp = fp;
- state->prev_type = info->type;
+ state->prev_type = info.type;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index ce190ee18a201..056fb045d0e0c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -103,14 +103,13 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
unsigned long fp = state->fp;
- struct stack_info info;
int err;
/* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
return -ENOENT;
- err = unwind_next_common(state, &info, on_accessible_stack, NULL);
+ err = unwind_next_common(state, on_accessible_stack, NULL);
if (err)
return err;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c
index 58f645ad66bcb..50a1fa6b5c044 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c
@@ -71,9 +71,7 @@ static bool on_accessible_stack(const struct task_struct *tsk,
static int unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
{
- struct stack_info info;
-
- return unwind_next_common(state, &info, on_accessible_stack, NULL);
+ return unwind_next_common(state, on_accessible_stack, NULL);
}
static void notrace unwind(struct unwind_state *state,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/stacktrace.c
index 949d19d603fba..b9cf551d9d31d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/stacktrace.c
@@ -97,9 +97,7 @@ static bool on_accessible_stack(const struct task_struct *tsk,
static int unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
{
- struct stack_info info;
-
- return unwind_next_common(state, &info, on_accessible_stack,
+ return unwind_next_common(state, on_accessible_stack,
kvm_nvhe_stack_kern_va);
}
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-05 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-05 12:45 [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: stacktrace: cleanups and improvements Mark Rutland
2022-08-05 12:45 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-08-05 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] arm64: stacktrace: rename unwind_next_common() -> unwind_next_frame_record() Mark Rutland
2022-08-08 11:38 ` Will Deacon
2022-08-08 11:46 ` Mark Rutland
2022-08-05 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] arm64: stacktrace: move SDEI stack helpers to stacktrace code Mark Rutland
2022-08-05 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] arm64: stacktrace: add stackinfo_on_stack() helper Mark Rutland
2022-08-05 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] arm64: stacktrace: rework stack boundary discovery Mark Rutland
2022-08-05 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] arm64: stacktrace: remove stack type from fp translator Mark Rutland
2022-08-08 11:55 ` Will Deacon
2022-08-08 12:08 ` Mark Rutland
2022-08-08 12:30 ` Mark Rutland
2022-08-08 11:56 ` Mark Brown
2022-08-05 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] arm64: stacktrace: track all stack boundaries explicitly Mark Rutland
2022-08-08 12:04 ` Mark Brown
2022-08-05 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] arm64: stacktrace: track hyp stacks in unwinder's address space Mark Rutland
2022-08-08 12:09 ` Mark Brown
2022-08-06 1:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: stacktrace: cleanups and improvements Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-08-08 11:59 ` Will Deacon
2022-08-08 12:11 ` Mark Rutland
2022-08-08 12:28 ` Will Deacon
2022-08-08 12:33 ` Mark Rutland
2022-08-08 12:38 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220805124522.706457-2-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox