From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B92BC25B0C for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 12:09:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=OBdEX5cWEU4cjjUWUYCl+7t2MdOtalRR+UY7q3hEogY=; b=eqcbfoiPnPcb6e yyQdjfhI6RopjT4IdRhZ78WJoAACW8QAkIEKbUDcpnGklqKbvApsPVWE6Adkamg7KusNZ3NeABMQQ JT0YbbxXAs6DqkypspJeeWs143FNSuG/3AcmT7EOI7/40OhU7S2dBA+qhW2s9yK10SQzaEv6vgi1X WjWew21BXrh1/l8uor1C7h1Cd2T2dvdQgi0R55v+9hDdF141jMyM+/RYiZ+VRQrQK7FpZlM3SokCj CP9Ql3+IyYySUWxQwNYBpEJZTE3QWPO6ERfz41c9ZRElqLLdv9pXqGNTim8ZLJyDBNNW8nmFdzjJG 9mq25SE+0BLpEYrQcmtw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oL1Yh-00DUmR-I1; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 12:08:35 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oL1Pg-00DQgI-Gt for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 11:59:17 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F27F1B80E7B; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 11:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECBBCC433D6; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 11:59:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1659959953; bh=dAO12c5svoNrkLxW9QstTtQyy58Ql2AKWO+5b5bD02s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oaMjs1JxN3sU0TSCDKLBYg3NtWFLcL24du9GA3l+KUnSDazblJCslOP8fVd/1iWrQ /KibRYf9NsCnyhECwGuzk8oSEDHi9ssWBXSWgQb62ae9N0lErXqctiK/z+H45m9Xec ASIXccTsYaAdzjClveCsIq8rkbi3pN64l8FNNwM0tqJUaC25J9xiTv6rDeSZoWIgTt nphYrr9fwBU+yxR81BWNZb6pNJpa7vQiNYzBGRSgLJAZcK6kKa0JBUWRgdbxSxz2+z /DKcQskOqhyx+V8pX9x93fObUo00UCJ1CCCKw6EQYfPyL7ag1JP9+XBqp2dANdZNxc cGDXVyleEAq+A== Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 12:59:08 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Mark Rutland Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier , broonie@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, kaleshsingh@google.com, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, tabba@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: stacktrace: cleanups and improvements Message-ID: <20220808115907.GC32107@willie-the-truck> References: <20220805124522.706457-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220805124522.706457-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220808_045916_756536_87B120BC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.97 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 01:45:14PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > This series is a set of improvements for the recently merged stacktrace > rework queued in the kvmarm next branch, along the lines of my prior > suggestions. I'm hoping that it would be possible to queue this for > -rc1. What justifies this for inclusion in -rc1? Although the series looks pretty good to me, it seems to be cleanup and refactoring which could wait for 5.21 (or whatever it ends up being called). What am I missing? Cheers, Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel