From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CAC5C00140 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 12:29:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=hvteX06gUZNzngmqXvq/d7KHAfMWlt4GWK9msBOf1Rs=; b=1N77gPBvW2hZZO kCZMT+Yo2CGqPp+ydBJTki33G+JCu0srK2O8oaQyf6aHJi+sR3CdRaz36jcJusHbA/nljDBDsHBUM gNTNOzcZJLd3gcWKxQECHVHl8CFwREPY2YHoxKj9+N8heEhUsJXOUq++VKI128c203YWmngeRHo8a EXR7+NwzUQ38USopBWcilKR1wXoJmrMxziQwFoiYVaJCfavxHGKrqXetC81GdchlO6wDDPqPvhpQ5 saf25ydjy+eyJWEhY8Fxa74IAt404bKX5psmzfEYsabDWGbvJ9hEci60OVcbyQxxmZweTa5AE1Qsi n5pLgmIPTz3B8iKMx4ug==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oL1s9-00DgV9-RC; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 12:28:42 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oL1s7-00DgTK-9K for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 12:28:40 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F054611C5; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 12:28:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18E4DC433C1; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 12:28:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1659961717; bh=sLJhlknOFyn4HlSGfdW9XdJ2I/Fty2g9x/rmb/oCtXI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oDsmVgP+aloJu1jRRvXaP1ccA7RmY0TxU3wibRwFX7yLnpqMp/xWPTyvX2XmNh9Tn 96C9JgAd2gCllUfToVA7rFpQTgv67wx8alal491QRzTQhv1b20meRSGK5WYuVE018J NYG07CuNCYdOIbqvPY5UAHKr2PR7PMtzaPx1NdGdU4k/smi2vhv1cIpnObUiKy2/La U19xrbqgK9tYTsa4wstNrGdvceNvln04jh9wakzLKsbm3vJc8mypusYsxYv0L9mZYu 8vIEnuYADUYk6trRC6wMZ+WV7im1KjYMgJWieNeEB7/p4e/z2X/QzFIpYB37TyzmrS RfN5CvOlvBUhA== Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 13:28:32 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Mark Rutland Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier , broonie@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, kaleshsingh@google.com, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, tabba@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] arm64: stacktrace: cleanups and improvements Message-ID: <20220808122831.GA32320@willie-the-truck> References: <20220805124522.706457-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20220808115907.GC32107@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220808_052839_386700_EB249996 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.25 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 01:11:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 12:59:08PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 01:45:14PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > This series is a set of improvements for the recently merged stacktrace > > > rework queued in the kvmarm next branch, along the lines of my prior > > > suggestions. I'm hoping that it would be possible to queue this for > > > -rc1. > > > > What justifies this for inclusion in -rc1? Although the series looks pretty > > good to me, it seems to be cleanup and refactoring which could wait for > > 5.21 (or whatever it ends up being called). What am I missing? > > If you think this should wait, that's fine by me. I plan to build atop this > with further rework and just wanted to get the trivial bits out of the way > early. Although this stuff is largely cosmetic, I wouldn't say it's trivial! So yes, how about we stick this on a branch at -rc3 and you can build on top of that? It also means you can spin a v3 with the various minor open issues addressed. Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel