public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian Kohlschütter" <christian@kohlschutter.com>
To: broonie@kernel.org
Cc: christian@kohlschutter.com, heiko@sntech.de, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, m.reichl@fivetechno.de,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, vincent.legoll@gmail.com, wens@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 12:46:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220818124646.6005-1-christian@kohlschutter.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvorNPDQQr2SH/NF@sirena.org.uk>

From: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>

Previously, an unresolved regulator supply reference upon calling
regulator_register on an always-on or boot-on regulator caused
set_machine_constraints to be called twice.

This in turn may initialize the regulator twice, leading to voltage
glitches that are timing-dependent. A simple, unrelated configuration
change may be enough to hide this problem, only to be surfaced by
chance.

One such example is the SD-Card voltage regulator in a NanoPI R4S that
would not initialize reliably unless the registration flow was just
complex enough to allow the regulator to properly reset between calls.

Fix this by re-arranging regulator_register, trying resolve the
regulator's supply early enough that set_machine_constraints does not
need to be called twice.

Signed-off-by: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index d8373cb04f9..a5033c6ba01 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -5496,7 +5496,39 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
 	BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&rdev->notifier);
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rdev->disable_work, regulator_disable_work);
 
-	/* preform any regulator specific init */
+	/* set regulator constraints */
+	if (init_data)
+		rdev->constraints = kmemdup(&init_data->constraints,
+					    sizeof(*rdev->constraints),
+					    GFP_KERNEL);
+	else
+		rdev->constraints = kzalloc(sizeof(*rdev->constraints),
+					    GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rdev->constraints) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto clean;
+	}
+
+	if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
+		rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
+	else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
+		rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name;
+
+	if ((rdev->supply_name && !rdev->supply) &&
+			(rdev->constraints->always_on ||
+			 rdev->constraints->boot_on)) {
+		/* Try to resolve the name of the supplying regulator here first
+		 * so we prevent double-initializing the regulator, which may
+		 * cause timing-specific voltage brownouts/glitches that are
+		 * hard to debug.
+		 */
+		ret = regulator_resolve_supply(rdev);
+		if (ret)
+			rdev_dbg(rdev, "unable to resolve supply early: %pe\n",
+					 ERR_PTR(ret));
+	}
+
+	/* perform any regulator specific init */
 	if (init_data && init_data->regulator_init) {
 		ret = init_data->regulator_init(rdev->reg_data);
 		if (ret < 0)
@@ -5522,24 +5554,6 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
 		    (unsigned long) atomic_inc_return(&regulator_no));
 	dev_set_drvdata(&rdev->dev, rdev);
 
-	/* set regulator constraints */
-	if (init_data)
-		rdev->constraints = kmemdup(&init_data->constraints,
-					    sizeof(*rdev->constraints),
-					    GFP_KERNEL);
-	else
-		rdev->constraints = kzalloc(sizeof(*rdev->constraints),
-					    GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!rdev->constraints) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto wash;
-	}
-
-	if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
-		rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
-	else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
-		rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name;
-
 	ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev);
 	if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
 		/* Regulator might be in bypass mode and so needs its supply
-- 
2.36.2


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-18 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAEwRq=qe+Frwpe=Zr4n_8A6vjOJnV3noegdnHSN7NTazkKejBA@mail.gmail.com>
2022-08-04 10:44 ` [PATCH v3] regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-15 11:17   ` Mark Brown
2022-08-18 12:46     ` Christian Kohlschütter [this message]
2022-08-18 15:23       ` [PATCH v4] " Mark Brown
2022-08-25 11:32       ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 12:21         ` Mark Brown
2022-08-25 14:23           ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 15:18             ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:28               ` [PATCH v5] " Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:35                 ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-26  5:55                 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-29 15:43                 ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 17:01                   ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-17 23:22                 ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-17 23:33                   ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-17 23:46                     ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-18  0:01                       ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-18  0:05                         ` Saravana Kannan
2022-08-18 15:22   ` [PATCH v3] " Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220818124646.6005-1-christian@kohlschutter.com \
    --to=christian@kohlschutter.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=m.reichl@fivetechno.de \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.legoll@gmail.com \
    --cc=wens@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox