From: "Christian Kohlschütter" <christian@kohlschutter.com>
To: broonie@kernel.org
Cc: christian@kohlschutter.com, heiko@sntech.de, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, m.reichl@fivetechno.de,
robin.murphy@arm.com, vincent.legoll@gmail.com, wens@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 12:46:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220818124646.6005-1-christian@kohlschutter.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvorNPDQQr2SH/NF@sirena.org.uk>
From: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
Previously, an unresolved regulator supply reference upon calling
regulator_register on an always-on or boot-on regulator caused
set_machine_constraints to be called twice.
This in turn may initialize the regulator twice, leading to voltage
glitches that are timing-dependent. A simple, unrelated configuration
change may be enough to hide this problem, only to be surfaced by
chance.
One such example is the SD-Card voltage regulator in a NanoPI R4S that
would not initialize reliably unless the registration flow was just
complex enough to allow the regulator to properly reset between calls.
Fix this by re-arranging regulator_register, trying resolve the
regulator's supply early enough that set_machine_constraints does not
need to be called twice.
Signed-off-by: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index d8373cb04f9..a5033c6ba01 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -5496,7 +5496,39 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&rdev->notifier);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rdev->disable_work, regulator_disable_work);
- /* preform any regulator specific init */
+ /* set regulator constraints */
+ if (init_data)
+ rdev->constraints = kmemdup(&init_data->constraints,
+ sizeof(*rdev->constraints),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ else
+ rdev->constraints = kzalloc(sizeof(*rdev->constraints),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rdev->constraints) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto clean;
+ }
+
+ if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
+ rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
+ else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
+ rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name;
+
+ if ((rdev->supply_name && !rdev->supply) &&
+ (rdev->constraints->always_on ||
+ rdev->constraints->boot_on)) {
+ /* Try to resolve the name of the supplying regulator here first
+ * so we prevent double-initializing the regulator, which may
+ * cause timing-specific voltage brownouts/glitches that are
+ * hard to debug.
+ */
+ ret = regulator_resolve_supply(rdev);
+ if (ret)
+ rdev_dbg(rdev, "unable to resolve supply early: %pe\n",
+ ERR_PTR(ret));
+ }
+
+ /* perform any regulator specific init */
if (init_data && init_data->regulator_init) {
ret = init_data->regulator_init(rdev->reg_data);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -5522,24 +5554,6 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
(unsigned long) atomic_inc_return(®ulator_no));
dev_set_drvdata(&rdev->dev, rdev);
- /* set regulator constraints */
- if (init_data)
- rdev->constraints = kmemdup(&init_data->constraints,
- sizeof(*rdev->constraints),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- else
- rdev->constraints = kzalloc(sizeof(*rdev->constraints),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!rdev->constraints) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto wash;
- }
-
- if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
- rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
- else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
- rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name;
-
ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev);
if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
/* Regulator might be in bypass mode and so needs its supply
--
2.36.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-18 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAEwRq=qe+Frwpe=Zr4n_8A6vjOJnV3noegdnHSN7NTazkKejBA@mail.gmail.com>
2022-08-04 10:44 ` [PATCH v3] regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-15 11:17 ` Mark Brown
2022-08-18 12:46 ` Christian Kohlschütter [this message]
2022-08-18 15:23 ` [PATCH v4] " Mark Brown
2022-08-25 11:32 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 12:21 ` Mark Brown
2022-08-25 14:23 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 15:18 ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:28 ` [PATCH v5] " Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:35 ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-26 5:55 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-29 15:43 ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 17:01 ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-17 23:22 ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-17 23:33 ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-17 23:46 ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-18 0:01 ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-18 0:05 ` Saravana Kannan
2022-08-18 15:22 ` [PATCH v3] " Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220818124646.6005-1-christian@kohlschutter.com \
--to=christian@kohlschutter.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=m.reichl@fivetechno.de \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.legoll@gmail.com \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox