* [PATCH v1 1/2] kselftest/arm64: Tighten up validation of ZA signal context
2022-08-24 22:40 [PATCH v1 0/2] kselftest/arm64: Small improvements to ZA signal handling coverag Mark Brown
@ 2022-08-24 22:40 ` Mark Brown
2022-08-24 22:40 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] kselftest/arm64: Add a test for signal frames with ZA disabled Mark Brown
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2022-08-24 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Shuah Khan, Shuah Khan
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kselftest, Mark Brown
Currently we accept any size for the ZA signal context that the shared
code will accept which means we don't verify that any data is present.
Since we have enabled ZA we know that there must be data so strengthen
the check to only accept a signal frame with data, and while we're at it
since we enabled ZA but did not set any data we know that ZA must contain
zeros, confirm that.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
.../selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/za_regs.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/za_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/za_regs.c
index b94e4f99fcac..2514cb7de525 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/za_regs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/za_regs.c
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ static void setup_za_regs(void)
asm volatile(".inst 0xd503457f" : : : );
}
+static char zeros[ZA_SIG_REGS_SIZE(SVE_VQ_MAX)];
+
static int do_one_sme_vl(struct tdescr *td, siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc,
unsigned int vl)
{
@@ -87,10 +89,22 @@ static int do_one_sme_vl(struct tdescr *td, siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc,
return 1;
}
- /* The actual size validation is done in get_current_context() */
+ if (head->size != ZA_SIG_CONTEXT_SIZE(sve_vq_from_vl(vl))) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "ZA context size %u, expected %lu\n",
+ head->size, ZA_SIG_CONTEXT_SIZE(sve_vq_from_vl(vl)));
+ return 1;
+ }
+
fprintf(stderr, "Got expected size %u and VL %d\n",
head->size, za->vl);
+ /* We didn't load any data into ZA so it should be all zeros */
+ if (memcmp(zeros, (char *)za + ZA_SIG_REGS_OFFSET,
+ ZA_SIG_REGS_SIZE(sve_vq_from_vl(za->vl))) != 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "ZA data invalid\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
+
return 0;
}
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH v1 2/2] kselftest/arm64: Add a test for signal frames with ZA disabled
2022-08-24 22:40 [PATCH v1 0/2] kselftest/arm64: Small improvements to ZA signal handling coverag Mark Brown
2022-08-24 22:40 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] kselftest/arm64: Tighten up validation of ZA signal context Mark Brown
@ 2022-08-24 22:40 ` Mark Brown
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2022-08-24 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Shuah Khan, Shuah Khan
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kselftest, Mark Brown
When ZA is disabled there should be no register data in the ZA signal
frame, add a test case which confirms that this is the case.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
.../arm64/signal/testcases/za_no_regs.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 119 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/za_no_regs.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/za_no_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/za_no_regs.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4d6f94b6178f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/za_no_regs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited
+ *
+ * Verify that the ZA register context in signal frames is set up as
+ * expected.
+ */
+
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <ucontext.h>
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+
+#include "test_signals_utils.h"
+#include "testcases.h"
+
+static union {
+ ucontext_t uc;
+ char buf[1024 * 128];
+} context;
+static unsigned int vls[SVE_VQ_MAX];
+unsigned int nvls = 0;
+
+static bool sme_get_vls(struct tdescr *td)
+{
+ int vq, vl;
+
+ /*
+ * Enumerate up to SME_VQ_MAX vector lengths
+ */
+ for (vq = SVE_VQ_MAX; vq > 0; --vq) {
+ vl = prctl(PR_SME_SET_VL, vq * 16);
+ if (vl == -1)
+ return false;
+
+ vl &= PR_SME_VL_LEN_MASK;
+
+ /* Skip missing VLs */
+ vq = sve_vq_from_vl(vl);
+
+ vls[nvls++] = vl;
+ }
+
+ /* We need at least one VL */
+ if (nvls < 1) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Only %d VL supported\n", nvls);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static int do_one_sme_vl(struct tdescr *td, siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc,
+ unsigned int vl)
+{
+ size_t offset;
+ struct _aarch64_ctx *head = GET_BUF_RESV_HEAD(context);
+ struct za_context *za;
+
+ fprintf(stderr, "Testing VL %d\n", vl);
+
+ if (prctl(PR_SME_SET_VL, vl) != vl) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Failed to set VL\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Get a signal context which should have a SVE frame and registers
+ * in it.
+ */
+ if (!get_current_context(td, &context.uc, sizeof(context)))
+ return 1;
+
+ head = get_header(head, ZA_MAGIC, GET_BUF_RESV_SIZE(context), &offset);
+ if (!head) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "No ZA context\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ za = (struct za_context *)head;
+ if (za->vl != vl) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Got VL %d, expected %d\n", za->vl, vl);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ if (head->size != ZA_SIG_REGS_OFFSET) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Context size %u, expected %lu\n",
+ head->size, ZA_SIG_REGS_OFFSET);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ /* The actual size validation is done in get_current_context() */
+ fprintf(stderr, "Got expected size %u and VL %d\n",
+ head->size, za->vl);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int sme_regs(struct tdescr *td, siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nvls; i++) {
+ if (do_one_sme_vl(td, si, uc, vls[i]))
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ td->pass = 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+struct tdescr tde = {
+ .name = "ZA registers - ZA disabled",
+ .descr = "Check ZA context with ZA disabled",
+ .feats_required = FEAT_SME,
+ .timeout = 3,
+ .init = sme_get_vls,
+ .run = sme_regs,
+};
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread