linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
	"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>, "Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	"Broadcom internal kernel review list"
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	"Allison Randal" <allison@lohutok.net>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:BROADCOM
	IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v2] clk: iproc: Do not rely on node name for correct PLL setup
Date: Mon,  5 Sep 2022 09:15:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220905161504.1526-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> (raw)

After commit 31fd9b79dc58 ("ARM: dts: BCM5301X: update CRU block
description") a warning from clk-iproc-pll.c was generated due to a
duplicate PLL name as well as the console stopped working. Upon closer
inspection it became clear that iproc_pll_clk_setup() used the Device
Tree node unit name as an unique identifier as well as a parent name to
parent all clocks under the PLL.

BCM5301X was the first platform on which that got noticed because of the
DT node unit name renaming but the same assumptions hold true for any
user of the iproc_pll_clk_setup() function.

The first 'clock-output-names' property is always guaranteed to be
unique as well as providing the actual desired PLL clock name, so we
utilize that to register the PLL and as a parent name of all children
clock.

Fixes: 5fe225c105fd ("clk: iproc: add initial common clock support")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
Changes in v2:

- added Acked-by
- remove empty newline



 drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
index 1a098db12062..680f9d8d357c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
@@ -726,6 +726,7 @@ void iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
 	const char *parent_name;
 	struct iproc_clk *iclk_array;
 	struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data;
+	const char *clk_name;
 
 	if (WARN_ON(!pll_ctrl) || WARN_ON(!clk_ctrl))
 		return;
@@ -773,7 +774,12 @@ void iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
 	iclk = &iclk_array[0];
 	iclk->pll = pll;
 
-	init.name = node->name;
+	ret = of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names",
+					    0, &clk_name);
+	if (WARN_ON(ret))
+		goto err_pll_register;
+
+	init.name = clk_name;
 	init.ops = &iproc_pll_ops;
 	init.flags = 0;
 	parent_name = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0);
@@ -793,13 +799,11 @@ void iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
 		goto err_pll_register;
 
 	clk_data->hws[0] = &iclk->hw;
+	parent_name = clk_name;
 
 	/* now initialize and register all leaf clocks */
 	for (i = 1; i < num_clks; i++) {
-		const char *clk_name;
-
 		memset(&init, 0, sizeof(init));
-		parent_name = node->name;
 
 		ret = of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names",
 						    i, &clk_name);
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2022-09-05 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-05 16:15 Florian Fainelli [this message]
2022-09-29  1:33 ` [PATCH v2] clk: iproc: Do not rely on node name for correct PLL setup Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220905161504.1526-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=allison@lohutok.net \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).