From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6CCDC6FA83 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 10:28:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=NOI01QcSt14eg4PSDCHfHDdVwf3IXqb5KmUneSr0xwg=; b=OyTZv8zwNorfBi VzjPfj21uls1DH3t6APmQ4obHOFYwMIFxMqsr0NkAngIRZ0pds2U50kvVqqbmyLGpTIziqrVaaR65 YE9qGHqvBfihRyZmn5EarSZ4tlcvcnwrQ3t4PrF+m1rNQEO48K2FA0MuJHhLJIyikIVH4PQQN1wUP 1AzKl5b5zQqIk4ehR51vLvX/Rw58EcWS0vSmufR5a/EYxKCTii4FYxLf3fyKaA9jJuuofGIOk1J3r 4VhbYsSxDg00qTH85GM1SH0Nc78foRU7f6Tb0PZ9/cf1drmth/jhStI8n5wlUXiNDxM4I0gmXn2i2 K2bE8L9hLMJCscvab53Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oXKAY-000DxC-Nh; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 10:26:30 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oXKAS-000Dt5-LW for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 10:26:28 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5838DB8070D; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 10:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25F77C433C1; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 10:26:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1662891981; bh=CX0IateX3sJ2WEFjcCnlZ/1dbHOryL+D+S1Du/XSe+Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=J2ZGYSj70hjY6RGmsJlpMEpjgHhvlx6MVM1y8tn9GkJFzsuEfjkSmHVGYVwqTRe7C NDzEjHpekCG2hi9BfuN1vhpXn8KLvC502VmJPgDYK66rN4mAzCVe9LW/el0awP48kb 8VZWkGVd2raOEWb3P8iYA/0sWBpQqwDV9ifuilTy3Fv2t7ca2URMRuFK9woMAQFa+3 nDIDTugFlhwnfyi9JbB503upsla2P9vGWxzHilcEIx4jiJoH1YN40fGQ+llSOXp04Z e7EOAxbow9hmmGuubvL5aKa6Eo/P3rg3JGdyVaJII7+rrpxtkDDoARz4gSRnuzAYif LxDiWtxfvcMyg== Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 10:52:15 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , NXP Linux Team Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: adc: mxs-lradc-adc: Get rid of OF specifics Message-ID: <20220911105215.72bd79f3@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: References: <20220530173324.921-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20220603181006.2c5cc6c4@jic23-huawei> <20220620204225.34d40a3f@jic23-huawei> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220911_032624_891203_35F8476C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.76 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 16:36:20 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:42:25PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 18:10:06 +0100 > > Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 May 2022 20:33:24 +0300 > > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > First of all, the additional conversion from vIRQ, and this is exactly > > > > what is returned by platform_get_irq_byname(), to vIRQ is not needed. > > > Confusing sentence form. Perhaps: > > > > > > First, the additional conversion from vIRQ (returned by platform_get_irq_byname()) > > > to vIRQ is not needed. > > > > > > > Hence, drop no-op call to irq_of_parse_and_map(). > > > > > > > > Second, assign the firmware node instead of of_node. > > ... > > > > Seems sensible to me, but I'd like a sanity check from someone more > > > familiar with this driver. > > > > This one has been outstanding for a few weeks. I'd still like > > an Ack or similar form someone who knows this device well. > > > > If no one has looked at it in a week or so I'll just go with > > my judgement and pick it up. > > Any news on this one? Maybe I need to resend with the better commit message? > >From glancing back at the thread, looks like you said you were going to send a v2 with property.h include. I think the rest of the thread is concerned with a different issue entirely. Jonathan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel