From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B3CECAAD3 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 09:03:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=SOk0XJkEAybmHWmSPbfQo9vP/JBmc+7yw3nRwVArYE0=; b=g8pG0N+BbvUfPY Tqvw82bM5sATLQSQhaem1ZGqhPEQ1da87lsYHZMIMEoE31y/huog+EtBoDJPcH3BGKbXFtSRpYTkZ KvaGsRaF+C1Ww90yFDfTR/0F2rvp4e+cvCUqK2VKVmdryusAiu5DlP15ygp19VIfqXO3z2WOHfI8z jG9IUGxMma9/HgHpNgGqZB0q0Cq02XGeR0tPwwQ386EMS71Z2W5RoQ4oYwSANivuzlpwncLSO4JIe Wy7LyPxj67KqvfH4rF/4gboBn88MK/pwFRormKg4G/MuRTpvsbJs8+mYWq5Pc+Elo/N8YU/+Lrv4h YcwPJOFLkk4W/Om/7/Zw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oZTiI-004kx6-G8; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 09:02:14 +0000 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oZTiE-004kug-Sj for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 09:02:12 +0000 Received: (Authenticated sender: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 069F0E000C; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 09:02:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1663405326; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J3n+5d6gN7wXx4G9cQ9iXiYL0yv1UNBqbWeZnd/o/68=; b=RXzA6qIFzDsgsg5h2XBhvb1k+H7xEflBwJVZ45xk8mKLVkl4d0MnquXtROW6Ek34DjR87e UovNg3uk1IHuVysoPnNV+mpIYm0oMskblt34T8WvqEVpa3mGd4gHAPP7zBvPdKn3AqSN/v mlg5WbKcJVyv7JNz5GT3UnKElGa0lNHFKN6h19KOXLvhXVN/I+vUy5q5EcTfUjoKlZVg2c Lr8fn6u2WKWcOr+SOF2ao+kD59noR7JjXmboeZ53626tXvXJBxLo41pLM6M5aew6B/bkEG nLj44Kdx/HUESXy3u0NpFV3Ufuvt9wlWqIDwXskVnxww0e3zUcQiYdWLnBtWqA== Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 11:02:02 +0200 From: Maxime Chevallier To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com" , Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Luka Perkov , Robert Marko Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] net: ipqess: introduce Qualcomm IPQESS driver Message-ID: <20220917110202.1b8562bf@fedora> In-Reply-To: <20220917002031.f7jddzi7ppciusie@skbuf> References: <20220909152454.7462-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> <20220917002031.f7jddzi7ppciusie@skbuf> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220917_020211_103233_CBCA5F8B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.85 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 17 Sep 2022 00:20:31 +0000 Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 05:24:49PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote: > > The DSA out-of-band tagging is still using the skb->headroom part, > > but there doesn't seem to be any better way for now without adding > > fields to struct sk_buff. > > Are we on the same page about what is meant by "skb extensions"? See > what is provided by CONFIG_SKB_EXTENSIONS, I did not mean it as in > "extend struct sk_buff with new fields". Yep, that was one of the other approaches I had in mind, and I've submitted a series adding fields to sk_buff in the past which was rejected (for good reasons). But indeed that comment on the cover-letter was misleading... Thanks, Maxime _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel