[PATCH v2] clk: iproc: Do not rely on node name for correct PLL setup

[PATCH v2] clk: iproc: Do not rely on node name for correct PLL setup

[Florian Fainelli]

After commit 31fd9b79dc58 ("ARM: dts: BCM5301X: update CRU block
description") a warning from clk-iproc-pll.c was generated due to a
duplicate PLL name as well as the console stopped working. Upon closer
inspection it became clear that iproc_pll_clk_setup() used the Device
Tree node unit name as an unique identifier as well as a parent name to
parent all clocks under the PLL.

BCM5301X was the first platform on which that got noticed because of the
DT node unit name renaming but the same assumptions hold true for any
user of the iproc_pll_clk_setup() function.

The first 'clock-output-names' property is always guaranteed to be
unique as well as providing the actual desired PLL clock name, so we
utilize that to register the PLL and as a parent name of all children
clock.

Fixes: 5fe225c105fd ("clk: iproc: add initial common clock support")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
Changes in v2:

- added Acked-by
- remove empty newline



 drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
index 1a098db12062..680f9d8d357c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-iproc-pll.c
@@ -726,6 +726,7 @@ void iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
 	const char *parent_name;
 	struct iproc_clk *iclk_array;
 	struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data;
+	const char *clk_name;
 
 	if (WARN_ON(!pll_ctrl) || WARN_ON(!clk_ctrl))
 		return;
@@ -773,7 +774,12 @@ void iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
 	iclk = &iclk_array[0];
 	iclk->pll = pll;
 
-	init.name = node->name;
+	ret = of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names",
+					    0, &clk_name);
+	if (WARN_ON(ret))
+		goto err_pll_register;
+
+	init.name = clk_name;
 	init.ops = &iproc_pll_ops;
 	init.flags = 0;
 	parent_name = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0);
@@ -793,13 +799,11 @@ void iproc_pll_clk_setup(struct device_node *node,
 		goto err_pll_register;
 
 	clk_data->hws[0] = &iclk->hw;
+	parent_name = clk_name;
 
 	/* now initialize and register all leaf clocks */
 	for (i = 1; i < num_clks; i++) {
-		const char *clk_name;
-
 		memset(&init, 0, sizeof(init));
-		parent_name = node->name;
 
 		ret = of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names",
 						    i, &clk_name);
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH v2] clk: iproc: Do not rely on node name for correct PLL setup

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Florian Fainelli (2022-09-05 09:15:03)
> After commit 31fd9b79dc58 ("ARM: dts: BCM5301X: update CRU block
> description") a warning from clk-iproc-pll.c was generated due to a
> duplicate PLL name as well as the console stopped working. Upon closer
> inspection it became clear that iproc_pll_clk_setup() used the Device
> Tree node unit name as an unique identifier as well as a parent name to
> parent all clocks under the PLL.
> 
> BCM5301X was the first platform on which that got noticed because of the
> DT node unit name renaming but the same assumptions hold true for any
> user of the iproc_pll_clk_setup() function.
> 
> The first 'clock-output-names' property is always guaranteed to be
> unique as well as providing the actual desired PLL clock name, so we
> utilize that to register the PLL and as a parent name of all children
> clock.
> 
> Fixes: 5fe225c105fd ("clk: iproc: add initial common clock support")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---

Applied to clk-fixes

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel