From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AB1FC4332F for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 16:53:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=PNlCc9eo4PPbz20AeOgXDZeINmznliPWW8XHKJDY8z4=; b=RNqCApI5LHwiFd 2/4J+pDhQW1HPbVIQmmJeDfTk0h19bxdcyS7+JQ3a2XAxaXZv4DOhwK1wNkQGXeWkVnweMIYc2xNY /rl8uOyAlj0YdA09TjesJjveix/fOCZSBrYAloM4WDCgHrMDzELCnoCFKkaMeXIksYO/hk13+hy5n 6BWrHOc6HwAVmqij2e83qUzjjbjHUfZrAXMOTTYr9saI1Ktt2fGEhh95iL3aoHcvgRlLsIRJ29J3L hVry1yHaBMXGPLTku2BqFjtnmdQTABGJM+BaoU8je22vq+Dj6kproRCQxp1Z06/iEC0oiOVrUXiuk OXw6jQ3dInql/jgEg8NQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oflA6-00AF81-3g; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 16:52:54 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oflA1-00AF7E-6o for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 16:52:50 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5FFF60F1E; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 16:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 909E7C433D6; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 16:52:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1664902367; bh=H/kqk6/7AqbB9wsKQ6qgwDPXIp5+pPlqmcvwBFolxPY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QjLhDul457gNLr7pTKrNOboviSc3RuXbj9WtRFYiwh42u8exuS1MIMCHO99VWozkk 6mQSzioh2pKBRanOFWZhyBoymECNBeaTMzaDDeA8H3Hhrel3+itL6zZzZrHG9BOYXG sGbKlMrSoYmGiQrKxXLwal8ompiamKGoUMKe/DOKvZ788Ttto+1L4GeMDAi4VYRR+l f+67oxTTk00XFt0CXEByIsOiqds1yDHUma+kaPjUBVECIFgaJmBnOB3MGLEmidS2tC tMYmx5aiH/tGBpBvfCFSS+B8wLG8FVNH6EsWJvScgECtFN+2Kzwq7gPD1EjnAtZcNt 6aYSvVxVdrviA== Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 09:52:45 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Sean Anderson Cc: "David S . Miller" , Madalin Bucur , Camelia Alexandra Groza , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , "linuxppc-dev @ lists . ozlabs . org" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ioana Ciornei , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Li Yang , Michael Ellerman , Paul Mackerras , Rob Herring , Shawn Guo , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/9] [RFT] net: dpaa: Convert to phylink Message-ID: <20221004095245.1e9918bf@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <0b47fd86-f775-e6ad-4e5f-e40479f2d301@seco.com> References: <20220930200933.4111249-1-sean.anderson@seco.com> <0b47fd86-f775-e6ad-4e5f-e40479f2d301@seco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221004_095249_338869_0105251D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.52 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:28:19 -0400 Sean Anderson wrote: > I noticed that this series was marked "RFC" in patchwork. Because the cover letter has RTF in the subject, presumably. > I consider this series ready to apply. I am requesting *testing*, in > particular on 10gec/dtsec boards (P-series). Since no one seems to > have tried that over the past 4 months that I've been working on this > series, perhaps the best way for it to get tested is to apply it... You know the situation the best as the author, you should make a clear call on the nature of the posting. It's either RFC/RFT or a ready-to-go-in posting. Maybe in smaller subsystems you can post an RFC/RTF and then it gets applied after some time without a repost but we don't do that. The normal processing time for a patch is 1-3 days while we like to give people a week to test. So the patches would have to rot in the review queue for extra half a week. At our patch rate this is unsustainable. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel