From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8956DC433FE for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 17:50:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=463tyXtnXUPr1xASWGaYNNjpk8fthteoa3Gw08w4+Po=; b=yDO6K4bZzbSIrX JtDeIW3kHcRSK82Dhdj/7HEJL1xU/71gKLAWAg02dzAU4JMEShpxy6Zy3csiafucrQiLlK4L09/q3 g+JUfbjTbYBzwm/4gqCH8MMkG74vXNlZHZV3a0VFL1iODkKdcIQeERL1XcRxfwUQmB+0IhjkVEdE/ sQBgbryHG2QlaleBjOf+sW/rIS9i+3gAiM8hwkmCYd2Az6zKSI8Yn94idVneonyl/f3kv2XkE6DbQ 7AOQEKjb3SFu6CLlNLfMpbW9SwYhtFdaELr7yP3kSXghkG+PUedtePYyGCglgrG2TyOL4YVcaKByB VpAp7FR/nxDS1Rtw/bBw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ojOo7-00FWWZ-PH; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 17:49:15 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ojOo3-00FWW7-V4 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 17:49:13 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id s196so3626844pgs.3 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:49:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fgg+Z6tz1c5hzcpV+3M0EHGrTn1Q32r1s7UqtR7H4Z4=; b=rKjysMoEJFnKsWxo+azU9/r8jB6dgiRWKOI8YL8DIkT2T9zE8kVZiWLxz5Pz/jSj8Y VKJB7wkhAtpSK6/p6LY7kLTa7zc5bR07bnpTpS52iijrkxu18j5UCRlg8YAx8IgBFTsx KfIX4cQLEqHu4H6hyyhWY2j15oROMF4D0KsMZMWyJ+lvMwasjrLjsYMQUpGrL30/rLes bErMpL+IUW2vkIkFZUtVCPTvRZYvlGiZDhgwMmo6w+z4ZrOLnhhJ/L9VlqF0uQocZK+/ Q7UXhqPlI+zzPlLCf9GimHw6afKOLJksc9zC2GzC5Ywq0plkyA4Q25RzOCBn3UI241s3 JJxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=fgg+Z6tz1c5hzcpV+3M0EHGrTn1Q32r1s7UqtR7H4Z4=; b=N8h+F+IdA4ETYHmgURFh1M21rILov59gWe6oem4b9vIPLvWnG9IF5JA34SqjPi+ZuE kodCoyrYauites3bXJNWzq4GtZksx8m4zrnlWeiT7MGiH6c84Gjt6tC0A1gzwNydHKc+ C7Y4d635ChQyJ3Mz0/0PeOfT6x842H6OG2dHrQMZEEN2LRRVofqs2NKKxaTgLoUzzbvK u9adwVdx6C0XS5LUTpQGvjiKflIiOQFZnOxvci+p1YLmMKxgGrzc5vaNeGRNpv8gN0S4 qBMrk6xps83hwDZ4FSV2y0t1McjvtTN3iPh1u9MhNDxYoBOcUbe5hmG7H9ws/ih8o++L IVlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2C+tEWqMMgteBlchkKBDo51Ksv5jkpKJitqpo5xN+mD8QCaCQ3 iWg8hVNNO5fS7XjZJlgpRbsZ5Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5k06dMy4xiWzMMmiotkK9Vymdbnd2tx2iRdvjq+IUO+YtCCjKShj3wY2w9FnmFvqz1erWZ/w== X-Received: by 2002:a63:450c:0:b0:443:94a1:3703 with SMTP id s12-20020a63450c000000b0044394a13703mr5406312pga.565.1665769747842; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p14s (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a7-20020a170902ecc700b00180cf894b67sm2001776plh.130.2022.10.14.10.49.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:49:03 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" Cc: andersson@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 6/7] remoteproc: imx_rproc: request mbox channel later Message-ID: <20221014174903.GA4125124@p14s> References: <20221014031037.1070424-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> <20221014031037.1070424-7-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221014031037.1070424-7-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221014_104912_057612_1EB19271 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 31.08 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 11:10:36AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > From: Peng Fan > > It is possible that when remote processor crash, the communication > channel will be broken with garbage value in mailbox, such as > when Linux is issuing a message through mailbox, remote processor > crashes, we need free & rebuild the mailbox channels to make sure > no garbage value in mailbox channels. > > So move the request/free to start/stop for managing remote procesosr in > Linux, move to attach/detach for remote processor is out of control of > Linux. > > Previous, we just request mbox when attach for CM4 boot early before > Linux, but if mbox defer probe, remoteproc core will do resource cleanup > and corrupt resource table for later probe. > > So move request mbox ealier and still keep mbox request when attach > for self recovery case, but keep a check when request/free mbox. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan > --- > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c > index 917e6db39572..1183de84a4c0 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c > @@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem { > #define ATT_CORE_MASK 0xffff > #define ATT_CORE(I) BIT((I)) > > +static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc); > +static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc); > static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc); > > struct imx_rproc { > @@ -357,6 +359,10 @@ static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) > struct arm_smccc_res res; > int ret; > > + ret = imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > switch (dcfg->method) { > case IMX_RPROC_MMIO: > ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg, dcfg->src_mask, > @@ -407,6 +413,8 @@ static int imx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > > if (ret) > dev_err(dev, "Failed to stop remote core\n"); > + else > + imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc); > > return ret; > } > @@ -592,6 +600,22 @@ static void imx_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) > > static int imx_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc) > { > + return imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(rproc); > +} > + > +static int imx_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv; > + const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg; > + > + if (dcfg->method != IMX_RPROC_SCU_API) > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + > + if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id)) > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + > + imx_rproc_free_mbox(rproc); > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -610,6 +634,7 @@ static struct resource_table *imx_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc > static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = { > .prepare = imx_rproc_prepare, > .attach = imx_rproc_attach, > + .detach = imx_rproc_detach, > .start = imx_rproc_start, > .stop = imx_rproc_stop, > .kick = imx_rproc_kick, > @@ -720,6 +745,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc) > struct device *dev = priv->dev; > struct mbox_client *cl; > > + if (priv->tx_ch && priv->rx_ch) > + return 0; > + You did exactly the same things as in V6. I asked you why this is needed and all you did is point me to the code in _probe(), which I can read on my own. Again - why is this needed when we know it will be done in start() and attach()? > if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mbox-names", NULL)) > return 0; > > @@ -749,8 +777,15 @@ static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc) > { > struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv; > > - mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch); > - mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch); > + if (priv->tx_ch) { > + mbox_free_channel(priv->tx_ch); > + priv->tx_ch = NULL; > + } > + > + if (priv->rx_ch) { > + mbox_free_channel(priv->rx_ch); > + priv->rx_ch = NULL; > + } > } > > static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc) > -- > 2.37.1 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel